Busy Litigation Docket, Big Deals Drive Gains at O'Melveny & Myers
In a year that saw long-running merger talks with Allen & Overy finally end up nowhere, the firm grew revenue by 4.3% and boosted profits per equity partner by 2.4%.
February 25, 2020 at 02:42 PM
5 minute read
O'Melveny & Myers posted its fifth straight year of revenue increases in 2019, growing its top line by 4.3% to $835.3 million.
The firm's net income rose 4.9% to $396.1 million, a 47% hike over the last five years. Profits per equity partner climbed 2.4% to $2.32 million, while revenue per lawyer expanded by 5.2% to $1.25 million.
"There was just a broad amount of above-the-fold work," said New York-based chairman Bradley Butwin. He noted that O'Melveny's share value, a crucial internal metric that determines how individual partners are compensated, also increased for the fifth straight year, growing by 48% over that interval.
Butwin added that rising demand was the biggest driver for the firm's growth, while rate increases were "relatively modest" compared to the rest of the market.
"With the upticks in net income and gross revenue, a good chunk of that is simply based on the fact that people are busier," he said.
The firm's litigation work was buoyed by two significant trial efforts. In February, a federal appeals court affirmed its victory on behalf of AT&T and Time Warner, which sought to preserve their $100 billion merger against opposition from the U.S. Department of Justice. Then, in May, serving as J&J's national litigation counsel, the firm took the country's first opioid case to trial, where it limited Oklahoma to 2.6% of the $17.7 billion it had sought.
The firm's litigators have another 38 cases slated to go to trial in 2020, including a bellwether opioids trial in New York in March and a California trial in June. "Those are massive cases," said Butwin, "and they're among the most important and highly publicized litigation in the nation."
On the corporate side, Butwin emphasized that the firm's dealmakers had closed a total of over 300 deals in 2019 with a combined value of over $150 billion, with over 20 exceeding $1 billion. Standouts included advising ViacomCBS in its acquisition of a 49% stake in Miramax and guiding longtime technology client Finisar Corp. in its $3.2 billion sale to II-VI Inc.
Bankruptcy lawyers are guiding the government of Puerto Rico through its restructuring of more than $70 billion in public-sector debt and $50 billion of pension obligations and they've been retained by the governor of California in utility Pacific Gas and Electric's Chapter 11 proceedings.
Butwin said that O'Melveny's strengths in both restructuring work and litigation place it in a safe position in the event of a potential recession in the coming years. The firm also enters 2020 with a higher level of inventory than its start of 2019, which in turn exceeded the previous year, along with a number of new matters.
"I'm pleased that we have the wind at our sails kicking off the new year," he said.
The firm's head count in 2019 was largely stable, as the number of total partners stayed fixed at 178, while the total number of lawyers dropped about 1% to 667. Key lateral hires included former U.S. Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben, who joined the firm with 106 Supreme Court oral arguments under his belt; Lisa Monaco, a former Homeland Security and counterterrorism adviser to President Barack Obama; Jeff Norton, a senior corporate finance partner who returned to the firm after serving as U.S. co-managing partner and head of banking at Linklaters; and Anna Pletcher, former assistant chief of the U.S. Department of Justice's Antitrust Division in San Francisco.
|Moving Forward Alone
Any reckoning of O'Melveny & Myers' 2019 must take into account a deal that wasn't completed: the firm's proposed merger with Magic Circle firm Allen & Overy. The firms said they would be halting discussions in September, 18 months after talks became public.
Nearly six months later, Butwin repeated that ending the conversations was a "mutual" decision. But he said the process was not without benefits.
"We're working together on the service of our shared clients," he said, noting that by learning more about each other's capabilities, the firms have more to offer these entities.
One benefit of the merger to O'Melveny would have been a substantially enhanced presence in London. Several partners and lawyers left that office since merger talks began, and the firm's website now lists just four partners, four counsel and one associate there.
Butwin said O'Melveny is looking to add London attorneys in areas that complement the rest of the firm's platform: restructuring, disputes, investigations and M&A. Members of the firm's senior management team are heading across the Atlantic next week to talk to prospects in the lateral market.
Growth in New York is also a priority; Butwin said he expects to be able to announce several corporate partners joining there in the coming weeks. And the firm could also stand to be bigger in Northern California.
And even without a blockbuster merger, Butwin is heartened by another year of record financial performance.
"The focus continues to be executing on our strategic plan," he said.
The 2019 financial figures reported in this story are preliminary. ALM will report finalized data for the Am Law 200 in The American Lawyer's May and June issues.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 2Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 3Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 4Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 5Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250