Chasing High-End Work, Vinson & Elkins Sees Profits Soar in 2019
Chair Mark Kelly said the firm improved its financials by going after more sophisticated matters, resulting in 6.1% revenue growth.
February 27, 2020 at 06:53 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Revenue was up 6.1% at Vinson & Elkins in 2019 as the Am Law 100 firm posted its fourth consecutive year of revenue growth, while profits per equity partner improved by 11.2%, as the firm looked to take on more sophisticated matters and shifted certain practices toward growth sectors.
Revenue for the Houston-founded firm came in at $792.6 million, compared with $747.2 million in 2018. Revenue per lawyer was nearly flat for the year at $1.21 million, compared with $1.20 million the year before, a metric affected by 5.5% growth in the firm's total head count.
Profitability was strong in 2019, with PEP hitting $2.80 million, compared with $2.52 million in 2018. Net income was $349.5 million, up 10.9% from $315.2 million in 2018.
Chair Mark Kelly said the partners are "very pleased" with the financials, particularly because revenue continues to improve. Also, PEP is on a "good trajectory," because it is up 107% over the last 10 years.
"What was really good for us was strong levels of business activity across a wide range of practice areas. It wasn't hot in one area, and down in others," Kelly said.
Like other large Texas firms, Vinson & Elkins is buffeted by out-of-state firms launching Texas offices and trying to grab market share—and its lawyers. But in evaluating the firm's improved financials, Kelly said Vinson & Elkins went after high-end work, looked for openings in the market in areas such as REITs and renewable energy, and made investments in offices outside of the Lone Star State. Expanding on his definition of high-end work, he mentioned bet-the-company litigation, high-risk transactions and large complex transactions that require a team of lawyers.
"You've got to get out there. You can't just expect the phone to ring," he said.
Kelly said the firm did institute some "single-digit" rate increases in 2019, but also managed expenses, he said.
"We have really focused on making sure we are prudent on how we spend our money," he said.
Total head count at the Houston-founded firm grew to 656 lawyers in 2019, up from 622 the year before, but the number of equity partners, 125, did not change, and the firm is down only one nonequity partner at 72.
New York was a focus of the firm's growth in 2019, Kelly said, noting that it moved this month into new space in the Grace Building.
Perhaps most significantly, the firm picked up a 15-lawyer group of real estate lawyers from Kasowitz Benson Torres, in New York. Other hires include international arbitration partner Camilo Cardozo; white-collar defense litigator Palmina Fava; and project finance partner Eamon Nolan.
Washington, D.C., was another key location for growth, with the firm adding lawyers including CFIUS partner Damara Chambers, environmental partner Patrick Traylor and government investigations and white-collar defense lawyer Ephraim "Fry" Wernick.
The growth through lateral hiring is part of a push to expand several practices including private equity, infrastructure, real estate, restructuring and shareholder activism, Kelly said.
Across the ocean, he said, the London office "did well" in 2019, building on a significant amount of hiring in 2018.
The firm's Texas offices are in Houston, Dallas and Austin, but other U.S. locations are New York, Washington, D.C., San Francisco and Richmond, Virginia. Overseas, it has offices in Beijing, Dubai, Hong Kong, London, Riyadh, Saudia Arabia, and Tokyo. The firm closed its Moscow office in 2019.
Kelly attributed the firm's revenue growth to a number of practices, including technology, particularly in Austin; real estate and REITs; restructuring; private equity; and renewable energy. The environmental, social and governance task force also saw more activity in 2019, he said, with lawyers advising clients on issues such as climate change, cybersecurity and human rights.
Kelly said the firm worked on 28 transactions in 2019 for large investors in the renewable energy space. Lawyers also handled infrastructure matters and projects for companies including Gulf Coast Ammonia, CPChem and New Fortress Energy. Tech company work included M&A for clients such as MoneyGram and ForeFlight.
In part because of lateral hiring, growth in the real estate and REIT practices was significant, Kelly said, noting that REIT offerings comprised nearly 40% of all securities offerings completed by the firm. Additionally, he said, the restructuring practice had one of its best years ever, representing clients including franchiser Taco Bueno in its pre-petition debt sale and prepackaged Chapter 11.
Among significant litigation wins, the firm secured a $100 million jury verdict in Colorado for client Antero Resources Corp., and a favorable Texas Supreme Court ruling for client Anadarko Petroleum in an insurance dispute related to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
Some practices were slower than usual in 2019, Kelly said, including traditional oil and gas and energy IPOs.
"Traditional energy is challenging now. You look at oil prices. With the renewable side of the house, are were able to gain market share," he said.
As for 2020, Kelly said he is hopeful because the firm is in a good position after four years of record revenue, and should reap the benefits of lateral hiring. But, he added, in an election year and with the long-term effects of the coronavirus remaining unknown, the industry is plagued by some uncertainty.
The firm will focus on hiring again in 2020, Kelly said. Vinson & Elkins is eyeing litigators and funds lawyers in New York, technology lawyers in Austin, and tax lawyers in London.
Despite the competition, Kelly said, "A good strategy for us is to really try to go for people at the top, people who fit culturally."
|Read More
Vinson & Elkins Hires Former EPA Lawyer With Clean Air Act Expertise
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Funnel Millions to Congressional Races, Though Skew Toward Dems
4 minute readPartner Pay Transparency Is Eroding, Even if 'Black Box' Systems Haven't Caught On
6 minute readDLA Piper Exhibited 'Far From Exemplary Conduct' in Patent Infringement Case, Judge Finds
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250