Shearman Sees Revenue Inch Up Amid Strategy to 'Reshape' Business
"You're seeing a drop in hours but an increase in revenue and profitability, which is exactly what we're trying to achieve," said senior partner David Beveridge.
February 28, 2020 at 12:43 PM
6 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Shearman & Sterling's revenue and profits per equity partner each rose just over 1% last year, as the firm balanced new hires, exits and new office openings amid a renewed focus on U.S. business.
Gross revenue grew 1.3% to $968.16 million, and average profits per equity partner rose 1.2% to $2.46 million. As total lawyer head count declined by nearly 4%, a net loss of about 33 lawyers, the firm's revenue per lawyer grew 5.2% to $1.14 million.
It was a year of "steady, consistent growth," said senior partner David Beveridge. "What we've been doing is reshaping our business to focus on our most profitable practices," growing revenue from corporate and private capital clients, such as hedge funds, private equity and sovereign wealth funds, he said.
Part of that strategy, he said, is increasing the firm's focus on the U.S and having "very measured investment" in offices such as Brazil—where Paul Hastings absorbed nearly all of Shearman's team in São Paulo in the last year—and in Hong Kong, where Shearman saw the exit of at least 10 capital markets-focused lawyers, including a team leader. Still, Beveridge said the firm maintains "market-leading" practices in Latin America and Asia.
Meanwhile, the firm has opened three new offices in Texas in the past two years, including in Houston, Austin and just this year, Dallas, as part of its focus on oil and gas and energy industries.
"The U.S. we think is the largest, most profitable legal market, and I think you're seeing most firms focus on that. We're no different," he said, adding the firm is still growing in London, the Middle East and elsewhere.
Shearman lawyers billed fewer hours in 2019 from 2018—about an 8% drop, according to American Lawyer figures—but Beveridge also credited that to a deliberate business pivot. The Hong Kong capital markets practice, for instance, had high hours, "so we lost a number of hours there" but the firm moved toward more profitable areas, he said.
Despite the drop in hours, Shearman achieved a revenue gain through higher realization, he said. "You're seeing a drop in hours but an increase in revenue and profitability, which is exactly what we're trying to achieve," he said.
Speaking on the slower revenue growth in 2019 compared with 2018, Beveridge noted the firm's slew of lateral hires. Last year, Shearman added 15 lateral partners and saw eight internal partner promotions. "We're getting people in with more work. You haven't seen the full benefit of the laterals we've hired yet," he said.
Beveridge declined to detail London office revenue, noting the firm doesn't break it out of firmwide totals. Overall, he said, London "improved year over year" in the amount of practice work and transactions. "It's just had some very strong practices."
|Equity Partner Decline
Amid the 1.3% increase in profits per equity partner, the firm saw a net loss of three equity partners, down to 135, and a net gain of nine non-equity partners, up to 74 in the non-equity tier.
Beveridge said the firm didn't de-equitize any partners, dismissing any notion that the firm decreased the number of equity partners to increase profits per partner.
He noted that newly elected partners enter the partnership as non-equity partners in the first year, while retiring partners also step into the tier. "But the shift isn't big enough to indicate anything significant," he said, noting the changes are "how we grow, who retires and who leaves."
Beveridge said the firm introduced non-equity partners years ago to increase flexibility in growing the firm's offices because pricing and profitability across Shearman's offices "are widely different." Still, the firm doesn't limit the size of the equity partnership, noting "it depends on performance."
It's been a busy time for Shearman. The firm re-signed a lease to stay at its longtime Manhattan address at 599 Lexington Ave. for the next two decades
The firm earlier this year opened a Dallas office with several Jones Day lawyers and three Shearman lawyers who transferred from the firm's Houston office, after adding launching in Austin and Houston. Meanwhile, Allen & Overy's U.S. leveraged finance group co-heads, partners Alan Rockwell and Michael Chernick, jumped to Shearman in October, and Renad Younes, from Ashurst, arrived in Shearman's Abu Dhabi office as a partner in early 2019.
The firm has also seen some high profile departures, including Laura Friedrich, who led the firm's investment funds team and moved to Willkie Farr & Gallagher earlier this month; corporate lawyer Brien Wassner, a co-leader of its private capital industry group who moved to Sidley Austin; and Robert Katz, an mergers and acquisitions lawyer who moved to Latham & Watkins.
Beveridge said he's sorry to see partners move on, but he doesn't see the exits affecting the firm's bottom line. The departures, he said, are "a natural rhythm in law firms."
|Practice Performance
The firm's practices in corporate, disputes and finance all performed well, Beveridge said.
For instance, in disputes, Shearman secured a victory for SS&C Technologies, a new corporate client, in a lawsuit against Clearwater Analytics alleging the misappropriation of trade secrets and obtained a total dismissal for Bank of Montreal and Bank of Nova Scotia regarding the financial benchmark antitrust litigation.
In corporate matters, Shearman advised on Raytheon's landmark combination with United Technologies; Viacom's merger with CBS, helping create one of the largest multiplatform content companies; and Dow's spinoff from DowDuPont.
In a large cross-border project finance matter, Sherman advised Malaysian national oil company PETRONAS on its $15 billion project financing relating to its joint venture with Saudi Aramco.
In pro bono matters, the firm's lawyers helped in the reunification of detained families and advised Impact Investment Exchange on a new bond fund to create sustainable livelihoods for over 2 million women across Asia.
The 2019 financial figures reported in this story are preliminary. ALM will report finalized data for the Am Law 200 in The American Lawyer's May and June issues.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDechert 'Spark Tank' Competition Encourages Firmwide Innovation Focus
Akerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 2When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 3Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
- 5Morgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250