Revenue and Income Dip at Nixon Peabody After Record 2018
After a rare contingency case added $22 million to the firm's bottom line in 2018, CEO and managing partner Andrew Glincher says the firm's financial performance in 2019 actually exceeded expectations.
March 09, 2020 at 01:23 PM
4 minute read
After multiple years of financial growth and a record-setting 2018, Nixon Peabody's financial performance declined in 2019, although firm management attributed the dip to a multimillion-dollar contingency fee in 2018 that added to its bottom line.
The firm's gross revenue of $505.5 million in 2019 was a 4.7% decline from its high-water mark of $530.6 million in 2018. Net income fell 11.1% to $175.1 million.
Revenue per lawyer, at $856,000, was down 2.1%, and profits per equity partner dropped by 3.7% to $1.447 million. Average compensation for all partners declined as well, to $756,000 in 2019.
Despite the decline, Andrew Glincher, Nixon Peabody's CEO and managing partner, said the firm exceeded financial expectations in 2019, citing a $22 million contingency fee in 2018 that rocketed the firm to its best financial year ever but couldn't be counted on for future years of financial success.
"We went into 2019 budgeting less money—our budget was $500 million [in gross revenue], and we exceeded that at $505.5 million," he said. Glincher added that excluding the contingency fee, the firm's 2018 profits per equity partner was $1,339 million, meaning 2019′s total increased 8% when comparing "apples to apples."
"If you take the contingency out of play, [2019] was essentially a repeat of last year," he said. "Across all cylinders, we are seeing great strength."
Glincher highlighted the firm's government investigations, white-collar, real estate and corporate mergers and acquisitions practices as the main drivers of success in 2019. The firm represented several parties involved in the Varsity Blues college admissions scandal, including former Stanford University sailing coach John Vandemoer. It is also representing the University of California in a direct patent enforcement campaign to protect the university's rights in the reinvention of the light bulb. The firm also advised TEGNA on $1.5 billion of M&A transactions.
Nixon Peabody added eight new partners in 2019, and Glincher highlighted the government work of three high-profile hires: former Department of Justice attorney Adam Tarosky; John Sandweg, former acting director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Department of Homeland Security general counsel; and the former chief of the Narcotics and Money Laundering Section at the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois, Chris Hotaling.
Overall, the hires were offset by firm departures, including an M&A trio that left for Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton in August and an aviation attorney's move to Locke Lord. Nixon Peabody ended 2019 with 591 attorneys, a 2.6% decrease from 607 in 2018. It had 121 equity partners in 2019, 10 fewer than in 2018, and had 181 nonequity partners in both years.
Glincher said much of the firm's investments have gone to its C-suite and business development opportunities. The firm hired a new chief marketing and growth officer, Danielle Paige, in October and is reworking its recruiting to be more aggressive and internally focused. The firm is also in the market for a new pro bono director.
"We wanted someone outside the legal industry this time around, an we hired [Paige] because she had never worked in a law firm," he said. "She looks at things differently and is building a different team, and I really like that."
Looking ahead to 2020, Glincher said Nixon Peabody will continue to search for great talent and look to expand strategically in areas with increasing client needs, such as M&A. He said he would "definitely consider" merger opportunities and regularly has conversations about potential combinations, but would only be interested if it involved the right group to add value for Nixon Peabody's clients.
"We've come off a series of years, over the last five years, where our profitability has been unheard of," he said. "That strong activity has come into 2020—our hours are already up."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDechert 'Spark Tank' Competition Encourages Firmwide Innovation Focus
Akerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Dog Gone It, Target: Provider of Retailer's Mascot Dog Sues Over Contract Cancellation
- 2Lululemon Faces Legal Fire Over Its DEI Program After Bias Complaints Surface
- 3Plaintiff Gets $500K Policy Limit Without Surgery
- 4Philadelphia Bar Association Executive Director Announces Retirement
- 5SEC Chair Gary Gensler to Resign on Trump's Inauguration Day
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250