Alston & Bird Stays Mum Over Reported $1M Donation to Project Veritas
The firm would not comment further on a New York Times report that called attention to its work serving as a conduit between an unidentified client and the conservative group.
March 10, 2020 at 10:18 AM
4 minute read
Atlanta-based firm Alston & Bird is playing a supporting role in a blockbuster drama over domestic spying on organizations considered hostile to President Donald Trump's agenda. But exactly what that role is remains unclear, and the firm won't shed light on it.
A New York Times report that went online Saturday found that Erik Prince, the security contractor who is a sibling of Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos, has been helping right-wing activist group Project Veritas by recruiting former spies to help infiltrate teachers unions and Democratic congressional campaigns.
A note that Alston & Bird served as the conduit for a $1 million donation to the controversial organization appeared halfway through the article.
The firm told the Times that Alston & Bird "has never contributed to Project Veritas on its own behalf, nor is it a client of ours," declining to comment on the source of the contribution. A spokesman did not respond to an inquiry from the American Lawyer on Monday.
Project Veritas was founded in 2010 by conservative provocateur James O'Keefe, the same year he was convicted for entering a federal building under false pretenses. Three Harvard University professors referred to the group as a "right-wing disinformation outlet" in their 2018 book on manipulation in American politics.
The Times report focused on the organization's efforts to infiltrate the Michigan office of the American Federation of Teachers and the congressional campaign of Abigail Spanberger, a former CIA officer elected to Congress as a Democrat in 2018. Prince, the former head of Blackwater Worldwide and an occasional informal adviser to Trump administration officials, allegedly recruited intelligence veterans to help guide Project Veritas staff.
Other previous targets of the group include Planned Parenthood, NPR and the Washington Post.
A search through federal records validates Alston & Bird's assertion that it has not represented Project Veritas in any litigation. But other Big Law firms have not shied away from working on behalf of the controversial group: attorneys from Am Law 100 firm Womble Bond Dickinson and Am Law 200 firms GrayRobinson and McCarter & English have all represented the firm in various pieces of federal litigation.
Alston & Bird, meanwhile, has previously appeared in another Trump-era controversy, one with origins well before the 2016 election. The firm registered under the Foreign Agents Registration Act to advise a public relations firm working on behalf of the Russian Federation in 2014, and a 2019 CNN report said that it has worked on behalf of Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, a business contact of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort, since 2003.
That 2019 report focused on another Alston & Bird mystery client: a foreign government-owned company that was challenging a mysterious grand jury subpoena related to the Robert Mueller investigation. While details of the matter remained cloudy even as the case rose to the U.S. Supreme Court, one of the few things reporters were able to ascertain was that Alston & Bird represented the business.
The firm opened up its 12th office last year, adding London to earlier international outposts Brussels and Beijing. In addition to its capabilities in litigation, deals and regulatory work, Alston & Bird hosts an influential D.C. lobbying team led by former Senate Majority Leader Bob Dole, R-Kansas, and former Rep. Earl Pomeroy, D-North Dakota. In 2019, it brought in nearly $8.5 million in lobbying revenue from 64 clients, according to data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
|Read More
DC Circuit Questions Broad Secrecy for Alston & Bird's Mystery Client
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250