What Defines Success in the Legal Profession? Finding an Answer Isn't Easy
In a time-consuming and competitive industry, success means something different to everyone, and reaching it feels harder than ever.
March 10, 2020 at 02:00 AM
4 minute read
A junior lawyer recently explained to me her dilemma. She wanted to have a successful career, to be well-thought of and become a partner at her large international firm, but she did not want to do all that at the expense of her other interests and her mental health.
The offer on the table at her stage of career feels like a binary one: Devote your life to your work, with long hours in the office and little time for anything else, or choose another path. The other path could be working as an in-house lawyer or moving to a smaller firm—neither of which guarantee less stress or fewer hours—or something else entirely.
She is typical of many millennials, who are increasingly disillusioned with the prospect of working brutal hours in order to make a lot of money further down the line. Can they have a successful career without becoming a partner? If they do make the partner rank but their private life falls apart, can that be called a success?
Some define success as becoming the best possible version of yourself. The problem is that being the best lawyer you can be might clash with your ability to be the best parent, which might also conflict with an aim to be the best artist or to have the best social life and so on. There are only so many hours you can devote to each one.
I decided to ask a range of the industry's top lawyers for their views on this tension.
"Success is achieving what makes you and those you love happy. Success is therefore different for different people," explains Nigel Boardman, the Slaughter and May stalwart who is probably Europe's most successful mergers and acquisitions lawyer in a generation. "For some, success, and therefore happiness, is dependent on winning the 100 meters at the Olympics; for others, it is participating in the three-legged race at your child's sports day."
Boardman believes it is possible to successfully navigate a career, hobbies and family life. But others believe there are always sacrifices.
"It's not necessarily impossible to have everything, but it's certainly highly unusual," says one U.K. partner.
One practice head admits that he works too hard and doesn't have many outside interests, while the head of a U.S. firm in London describes how he eventually had to give up one of his favorite hobbies because his work commitments were too time-consuming. Should those be regarded as failures or successes, given that they both reached top ranks in their profession?
Neither, according to James Roome, London senior partner at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld.
"It is, of course, a wonderful thing to have a passion outside of one's career, but I don't think the absence of other interests should be seen as a measure of success," he says. "The alternative would reflect the false dichotomy of the work/life balance, as if work were not a legitimate part of one's life. In my opinion, one is exceptionally lucky if work—which takes up a huge proportion of everyone's waking hours—is an important and fulfilling part of one's life."
Where this leaves an aspiring young lawyer is unclear. There is no way around the long and intense working conditions. For most successful lawyers, work occupies such a large portion of their time that they can't fit much else into their lives—and, crucially, they are happy with that.
But there is also an important caveat, according to one U.K. partner: "Clients are not only interested in the legal advice they receive but also the lawyers who deliver that advice. It's not easy to be engaging if you've got nothing to talk about beyond the law."
And perhaps that is the most encouraging answer the conflicted junior lawyer could have hoped for.
Email: [email protected]
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readLosses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250