How Coronavirus and a Bear Market Could Upend Law Firm Hiring
There's no sign yet of panicked hiring freezes, and offers are already out for the newest crop of associates. But the situation is evolving quickly, and even if it's very unlike the Great Recession, the pandemic is bound to affect the legal job market.
March 12, 2020 at 05:00 AM
5 minute read
When the U.S. stock market went into a tailspin in the fall of 2008, the response among law firms was swift and nearly uniform.
Hiring ground to a halt almost immediately after the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy prompted a 4.5% one-day drop in the Dow Jones Industrial Average on Sept. 15. Law students who were lucky enough to have interviews that August received offers, but after the crash, even those from top schools with the shiniest of resumes got nothing.
Fast-forward to this week, when the Dow sank by 7.8% on Monday, with the sudden start of a price war on oil compounding growing fears about the spread of the coronavirus, and it dropped another 5.8% Wednesday. Since peaking on Feb. 12, the index is down 20.5%.
And yet, firms have yet to panic, at least openly. Instead, the response has been dispersed and diverse.
According to Lateral Link managing director David Lat, some firms are carrying on as normal, while some are tweaking hiring procedures by turning to video conferencing or moving interviews outside of offices. Still others report they are putting certain searches on hold, or slowing their response times when they previously passed along decisions quickly.
"Firms are keeping their powder dry because of the unpredictability," said Lat, who as the founding editor of Above the Law, had a front-row seat for the last crisis. "It's hard to read things, because firms are taking different approaches."
One area where the impact should be minimal is on the newest entry-level associates. Both large firms and small firms have largely assembled their incoming classes.
"We did our hiring for the summer [and] fall months and months ago," said David Greenwald, managing partner at Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson. "That's locked and loaded."
Same for Washington, D.C.-based tax boutique Caplin & Drysdale, although the timing was closer.
"[On campus interviews] just finished, and the summer offers are out," said firm administrator John Riggleman. "Three weeks back, it probably would have had a greater impact."
And while some firms elected to defer the start dates of incoming associates and even rescind offers during the Great Recession, that talk has not yet entered the conversation. Nor have firms said they are categorically halting lateral hiring in the face of economic uncertainty.
"I don't think this is anything like what we saw in 2008, when people had offers withdrawn," said Jeffrey Lowe, the global practice leader of Major, Lindsey & Africa's Law Firm Practice Group. "I think everyone's responses have been really measured and thoughtful and I think we're going to get through this just fine."
Michael Ellenhorn, founder and CEO at competitive intelligence outfit Decipher, said that demand for the tools his company provides to help law firms evaluate laterals has stayed steady.
"We are not seeing a slowdown in volume," he said.
Nonetheless, the mechanics of the hiring process are bound to be affected, and a slowdown in lateral hiring is a distinct possibility, if only for short-term practical considerations. Turning to Skype interviews is useful at the start of the process. "But at some point, [candidates] are going to have to come into the office and meet people," Riggleman said.
But in Lat's experience, that's not always the case. He was recently working with an attorney based in Asia who was eager to land a job back in the U.S. After a videoconference, the candidate landed an offer on the spot.
"For the firms that are willing to proceed with hiring in this environment, they can get talent that they would otherwise have trouble getting," he said. "I think there's an opportunity for firms that stay the course and don't panic."
And, if stocks continue their slide into a bear market, some transactional practices will undoubtedly suffer. But other work, notably restructuring and energy deals, could see increased demand, and bold firms might already be looking for the right candidates to help them scale up their capabilities.
Lat said that, for now, market watchers can take comfort in the fact that not a single firm has explicitly said it is retrenching or freezing all its hiring.
"You're not seeing a plethora of withdrawn searches," he added.
But much rests on the coming weeks. Will firms simply continue to make short-term adjustments to how they bring new lawyers on board? Or will the continued spread of the virus be the weight that drags the economy into recession, forcing a long-term evaluation of strategic needs?
Buckle up. Or maybe the guidance should be, "Wash your hands."
Additional reporting by Jack Newsham.
|Read More
Law Schools Shift Classes Online Amid COVID-19, But Can They Do It Successfully?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250