At Least You Can Quit Shaving Your Legs
Working from home means your appearance no longer matters, so you can let your work speak for itself and dispense with the superficialities.
March 18, 2020 at 02:59 PM
3 minute read
This morning, I looked at myself in the bathroom mirror and was immediately horrified at the state of my hair: Messy, matted and dirty. I looked like an unkempt shih tzu.
Shampoo day!
But then I thought, what's the point? I'm not seeing colleagues. I'm not meeting any Big Law muckety-mucks. Do I really need to get dolled-up to make my daily run to CVS for toilet paper, which always ends in vain? Hell no.
Then it hit me: There's a silver lining to this coronavirus ordeal. You can look like a Neanderthal and it won't matter one iota.
So I racked my brain for other positive aspects of this crisis. And miraculously, I found a few bright spots. Oh, I know they're small comforts, but permit me to share:
This is the death knell for workplace face-time. (No, I don't mean the kind on your phone.) Remember all those discussions about flexible working arrangements and how some firms acted like they're doing lawyers a big favor for permitting remote work? (Just over a year ago, Weil, Gotshal & Manges patted itself on the back for allowing associates with at least three years of seniority to work from home.) Well, that is ancient history. After this crisis, you can work from a treehouse—and there's not a damn thing anyone can do about it.
You no longer have to hide your kids or personal life. Now that everyone is trapped at home, lawyers—particularly women—can be more open about their parental duties and not fear being judged as unprofessional. Before you know it, the sounds of domestic life (babies crying, children throwing temper tantrums, dogs barking) will be considered normal work noise—like the clickety clack of typewriters in the old days.
You are saving a lot of money. Consider what you've saved just in the last week or two: Canceled vacations to Europe, theater tickets and reservations at Jean Georges. And that's not counting all the ongoing vanity expenses you have, like makeup (news alert: Sephora is closed for the sake of public health), haircuts, highlights, Botox, facials, mani-pedis and personal trainers. Now, there's nothing to spend money on except toilet paper and Purell.
Yes, you can be a super parent. All that self-grooming you've abandoned entailed not just expenditure of money but also time. (Hey, it's not easy to look the part of a spiffy Big Law mover and shaker.) These days, you have a simplified, purer lifestyle, so the whole work-life balance should be a much more achievable goal. You can finally have it all—be that high-power lawyer and a hands-on parent.
You can be totally authentic. This gets back to my original point: Your appearance no longer matters, so you can let your work speak for itself and dispense with the superficialities. You don't have to worry about whether you look the part, have sufficient executive presence or other such nonsense. Except for some fleeting cameos on Zoom, you're basically invisible to the world. So why not work away and set loose your inner slob?
No one will care how awful you look or smell. True, maybe your spouse will complain, but do you care?
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStars and Gripes: Firms Need a 'Superstar Culture' to Crack the U.S. Market
6 minute readHSF's American Dream: What Will a U.S. Merger Mean For its Asia Practice?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Does My Company Really Need a Generative AI Policy?
- 2'This Is a Watershed Moment': Daniel's Law Overcomes Major Hurdle
- 3Navigating the Storm: Effective Crisis Management (Part 1)
- 4The Testamentary Exception Does Not Permit a Decedent to Impliedly Waive a Survivor’s Attorney-Client Privilege
- 5Trump 2.0 and Your Career
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250