Homebound by Coronavirus, Lawyer-Parents Bear Extra Burden
For mothers in particular, the demands of remote working can be intense, and the coming weeks will hold lessons for law firms that go beyond the current crisis.
March 18, 2020 at 11:01 AM
5 minute read
As the new coronavirus shuts down travel and triggers pleas—and maybe orders—for citizens to stay home, many law firms have shifted to remote work to accommodate both the government's self-isolation recommendations and clients' needs.
But for some attorneys, working from home presents a particular challenge: As schools across the nation close to prevent the spread of the highly contagious virus, lawyers who are also parents suddenly have to juggle the demands of practicing law with full-time child care. And, as studies show that child-rearing and household duties fall mostly to women, female attorneys with kids are disproportionately affected when law firms expect the same schedule when working from home, notes Summer Eberhard, managing director of Major, Lindsey & Africa's Associate Practice Group.
Eberhard, a lawyer-turned-Bay Area and Pacific Northwest recruiter with two young children of her own, spoke with ALM about the unique needs of attorneys with kids during the coronavirus outbreak, and how their law firms can support them.
The shift to remote work has been difficult for everyone, but especially for lawyers with kids. You work with associates, some of whom are parents. How do their needs differ during this time?
I work almost exclusively with Am Law 100 firms and high-end boutiques and their associates, so anywhere from junior associates—2019 grads—all the way through attorneys who may be eight years out of law school. People who have young, elementary school-aged children are about the age of the attorneys I'm working with every day, and with that age, it's even harder. When kids are a little older, you can give them a plan and assignments and they can operate somewhat on their own. It's a much different situation when you're an associate with a 10-month-old or a 3-year-old, which is much more hands-on and you have to be really attentive all day long.
On one hand, you have a generation that's been pushing toward working from home at least on occasion, that's now getting used to doing that on a full-time basis, which can be very isolating and challenging in its own way. Adding in the complexity of having children at home, and it's this extra tension that younger attorneys will be dealing with now.
I'm especially interested in lawyers who are mothers navigating this change.
Mothers will be specifically impacted by this. In their own households, moms tend to be the ones responsible for the children day-to-day. Even if a household has two working parents, the work typically doesn't end up being equitable. That's why it's really important for everyone in the household to have a plan and be able to function both as caretakers and as professionals. Otherwise, this will really impact women professionally—not just now while they're home with their kids, but also responsibilities in the future.
You're an attorney-turned-legal recruiter who is currently working from home with a 10-month old and a 3-year-old. Any strategies you can recommend?
My partner and I have been trading off every three to four hours to watch our kids, and then we have our laptops open in the evening after bedtime. But even relying on your partner, neighbors and family members, managing this situation might mean getting four solid work hours in during the day instead of nine or 10. Many attorneys with small children are not in a position to get a full workday in, which really requires law firms to be more patient and understanding during this transition. That's why flexible time is important. We need to realize that being able to be online for eight to 10 hours straight is really not possible when you have small kids at home. A lot of different stakeholders are going to have to work together to figure this out. Deadlines still have to happen, so communication is key and some responsibilities may have to shift to meet them.
What should firms be doing to support their attorneys with kids when everyone is home?
Being a parent as well as lawyer is not really something people talk about, especially at the associate level. And law firm partners who are in an older generation are a lot more resistant to the idea of telecommuting because they lived in a legal world where face time was incredibly important, both within the firm and with clients. But in today's technological age, that's no longer necessary.
This is a situation that could demonstrate what it looks like to work successfully even when you're not in the office. I think that goes back to communication. Firms and attorneys need to have an open dialogue about what everyone's personal situation is. When everyone is doing that, people are not going to feel alone. At Major, Lindsey & Africa, we have parent groups where we talk about these issues; that needs to happen in law firms, too, and folks in leadership can't assume that when kids are home, their remote-working parents will be able to operate in the same way as when they're in the office, and they need to be OK with it. It really comes from the top down.
You have a lot of firms right now that have taken steps to move toward this environment, as well as firms that haven't. It will be really interesting to see what happens, and I really hope this makes law firms realize they need to start making adjustments and transitions to be more work-from-home friendly and parent friendly, even outside the current crisis.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
3 minute readKirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
5 minute readGoodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250