Legal Services Are Still 'Essential Business' in Illinois Stay-at-Home Order
Gov. J.B. Pritzker ordered all non-essential businesses operating in the state to close their doors as restrictions tightened nationwide on Friday.
March 20, 2020 at 08:11 PM
4 minute read
The vast majority of law firms in Illinois can breathe easy—in relative terms—as the governor's stay-at-home order specifically designates "legal services" as an essential business that is "encouraged to remain open."
Gov. J.B. Pritzker on Friday ordered all nonessential business operating in Illinois to close, joining the ranks of states such as California, New York and Pennsylvania that have announced mandatory closures in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Flanked by state officials as well as Chicago Mayor (and former Mayer Brown partner) Lori Lightfoot, Pritzker during a press conference said the order doesn't affect grocery stores, gas stations and medical providers.
"We are doing all that we can to maintain as much normalcy as possible while taking the steps that we must to protect you. That brings me to what will change all non essential businesses must stop operating," Pritzker said. "If you can work from home and aren't already doing so, now is the time when you must."
But the executive order released by his office lists 23 different kinds of businesses that are considered "essential businesses and operations," including "professional services, such as legal services, accounting services, insurance services, real estate services (including appraisal and title services)."
All of the essential businesses listed in Pritzker's executive order are required to engage in social distancing, including designating six-foot spaces and having sanitizing products available. The governor's order goes into effect Saturday evening and expires April 7.
Pritzker's order appears to be less strict than the shelter-in-place the village of Oak Park—a neighboring suburb of Chicago—implemented on Friday. That order says professional services such as legal services can stay open "when necessary to assist in compliance with legally mandated activities." That means attorneys like Shanita Straw, who operates the small general-practice firm Golden Law, are prohibited from opening their offices to receive mail.
"Working remotely is not ideal as we are a general practice law firm and we handle estate planning, real estate and general business matters and those clients are affected because we cannot meet with them to receive or deliver documents for signature," Straw said.
Big Law has transitioned to having thousands of lawyers and professional staff work remotely in an effort to stop the virus from spreading, infecting others and further destabilizing the country. That includes a number of Chicago-area law firms and offices.
"We are now working almost entirely remotely in Chicago," said David Pope, Chicago administrative partner and co-chair of the class action practice group at Benesch, in a statement. "We have a couple of non-legal personnel who have been keeping the physical office running, but otherwise all of our attorneys and staff are working remotely using their laptops."
But even as Big Law goes remote, there are still some things that have to be done by hand. Marc Benjamin, the partner in charge of Eversheds Sutherland's Chicago office, said that, even though he and his colleagues have been working remotely this past week, they've still had to send at least one person into the office to process physical mail, accept packages, and check to see if everything's running.
"If you're open for business, you need to have somebody there," said Benjamin said, adding that the firm is paying for employees' parking so they don't have to take public transportation.
Personal injury law firms such as Levin & Perconi rely on physical mail—that's how the office sends and receives paper checks.
"That's a critical function that we'll have one person at a time tasked to maintain because our clients are counting on that," said Steven Levin, the founder and senior partner of Levin & Perconti, in a statement.
K&L Gates has one answer to the mail problem: They've sent all-in-one printer/scanners/copiers to a few key administrative staff members, said Celeste Herrera, the director of the firm's administration in Chicago, in a statement.
"The postal mail will go to one person, who will scan and distribute it. FedEx, UPS and DHL document deliveries will go to another person who will do the same," Herrera said.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Bankruptcy Judge to Step Down in 2025
- 2Justices Seek Solicitor General's Views on Music Industry's Copyright Case Against ISP
- 3Judge to hear arguments on whether Google's advertising tech constitutes a monopoly
- 4'Big Law Had Become Too Woke': Why Bill Barr Moved On
- 5Manhattan U.S. Attorney Damian Williams Announces Resignation from Office
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250