Michigan Closes Law Firm Offices, Indiana Keeps Them Open
The stay-at-home orders come on the heels of similar decrees in California, Illinois, New York and Pennsylvania.
March 23, 2020 at 04:19 PM
3 minute read
Law firms will close in Michigan but stay open in Indiana, continuing the growing patchwork of state-mandated shutdowns that are being implemented to combat the COVID-19 outbreak.
Both Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Indiana Gov. Eric Holcomb ordered residents in their respective states to stay at home in an effort to halt the spread of the coronavirus. Both orders require nonessential businesses to close their doors.
But the two states differ on whether legal services are considered essential. Whitmer's executive order does not list lawyers or most law firm personnel as "critical infrastructure workers." Instead, the only law firm employees that can be at the office are the ones who "conduct minimum basic operations," like processing transactions or helping other employees work remotely.
"I know this is hard. I know this is going to be disruptive," Whitmer said during a press conference, according to MLive Media Group. "It's certainly going to be hard on our economy as well. But our action will save lives. Doing this now shortens the time our academy suffers. When we look back at this we've got to be able to say we did everything we could."
Holcomb's executive order, in contrast, lists "professional services, such as legal services, accounting services, insurance services, real estate services (including appraisal and title services)" as an essential business.
Indiana's legal services exemptions matches the carveout Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker gave to law firms in his own executive order Friday. California, New York and Pennsylvania have also made similar announcements.
Big Law has transitioned to having thousands of lawyers and professional staff work remotely in an effort to stop the virus from spreading, infecting others and further destabilizing the country. That includes a number of Big Law firms that are based or operate in Michigan.
Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone CEO Michael McGee said the firm was "already in substantial compliance" with Whitmer's executive order, as most of the firm's lawyers and staff were already working remotely as of last week.
"We made the transition quickly and in an orderly manner, so this morning our operations needed no significant change to comply with the governor's order," McGee said in a statement. "The very small number of people who must remain on-site to perform mission-critical functions will be here, but our offices are not open to non-employee visitors."
All of Dickinson Wright's 18 offices "went fully remote" March 17, said firm CEO Michael Hammer. A spokesperson for Clark Hill said they've also gone remote and are "following all state and local guidelines for stay-at-home and other health directives."
"Law firms generally are extremely well-positioned to take advantage to continue to function in the midst of this. They have been creating the capacity for lawyers to work anywhere at any time, as swiftly as the technology presents itself," said Dan Scott, a legal recruiter based in Michigan.
Read More
Legal Services Are Still 'Essential Business' in Illinois Stay-at-Home Order
Mandated Closures Have Law Firms Confused and Scrambling
Facing Uncertainty, Law Firms Seek Credit, Brace for Less M&A
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhite & Case Crosses $4M in PEP, $3B in Revenue in 'Breakthrough Year'
6 minute readHaynes and Boone Expands in New York With 7-Lawyer Seward & Kissel Fund Finance, Securitization Team
3 minute read'None of Us Like It': How Expedited Summer Associate Recruiting Affects Law Students and the Firms Hiring Them
Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1January Petitions Press High Court on Guns, Birth Certificate Sex Classifications
- 2'A Waste of Your Time': Practice Tips From Judges in the Oakland Federal Courthouse
- 3Judge Extends Tom Girardi's Time in Prison Medical Facility to Feb. 20
- 4Supreme Court Denies Trump's Request to Pause Pending Environmental Cases
- 5‘Blitzkrieg of Lawlessness’: Environmental Lawyers Decry EPA Spending Freeze
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250