Michigan Closes Law Firm Offices, Indiana Keeps Them Open
The stay-at-home orders come on the heels of similar decrees in California, Illinois, New York and Pennsylvania.
March 23, 2020 at 04:19 PM
3 minute read
Detroit, Michigan. Photo: Shutterstock
Law firms will close in Michigan but stay open in Indiana, continuing the growing patchwork of state-mandated shutdowns that are being implemented to combat the COVID-19 outbreak.
Both Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Indiana Gov. Eric Holcomb ordered residents in their respective states to stay at home in an effort to halt the spread of the coronavirus. Both orders require nonessential businesses to close their doors.
But the two states differ on whether legal services are considered essential. Whitmer's executive order does not list lawyers or most law firm personnel as "critical infrastructure workers." Instead, the only law firm employees that can be at the office are the ones who "conduct minimum basic operations," like processing transactions or helping other employees work remotely.
"I know this is hard. I know this is going to be disruptive," Whitmer said during a press conference, according to MLive Media Group. "It's certainly going to be hard on our economy as well. But our action will save lives. Doing this now shortens the time our academy suffers. When we look back at this we've got to be able to say we did everything we could."
Holcomb's executive order, in contrast, lists "professional services, such as legal services, accounting services, insurance services, real estate services (including appraisal and title services)" as an essential business.
Indiana's legal services exemptions matches the carveout Illinois Gov. J.B. Pritzker gave to law firms in his own executive order Friday. California, New York and Pennsylvania have also made similar announcements.
Big Law has transitioned to having thousands of lawyers and professional staff work remotely in an effort to stop the virus from spreading, infecting others and further destabilizing the country. That includes a number of Big Law firms that are based or operate in Michigan.
Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone CEO Michael McGee said the firm was "already in substantial compliance" with Whitmer's executive order, as most of the firm's lawyers and staff were already working remotely as of last week.
"We made the transition quickly and in an orderly manner, so this morning our operations needed no significant change to comply with the governor's order," McGee said in a statement. "The very small number of people who must remain on-site to perform mission-critical functions will be here, but our offices are not open to non-employee visitors."
All of Dickinson Wright's 18 offices "went fully remote" March 17, said firm CEO Michael Hammer. A spokesperson for Clark Hill said they've also gone remote and are "following all state and local guidelines for stay-at-home and other health directives."
"Law firms generally are extremely well-positioned to take advantage to continue to function in the midst of this. They have been creating the capacity for lawyers to work anywhere at any time, as swiftly as the technology presents itself," said Dan Scott, a legal recruiter based in Michigan.
Read More
Legal Services Are Still 'Essential Business' in Illinois Stay-at-Home Order
Mandated Closures Have Law Firms Confused and Scrambling
Facing Uncertainty, Law Firms Seek Credit, Brace for Less M&A
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Former McCarter & English Associate Fired Over 'Gangsta Rap' LinkedIn Post Sues Over Discrimination, Retaliation
6 minute read
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
