For Some Law Firm Support Staff, Pandemic Brings New Uncertainty
With the coronavirus pandemic resulting in most law firms working from home, some law firm staff are having an easier time adapting than others.
March 27, 2020 at 04:56 PM
4 minute read
The coronavirus' impact on law firms isn't limited to lawyers.
Law firm paralegals and staff working on business development, marketing, IT, accounting and more have also been forced through a drastic shift. For some, the transition to working from home has been simple; others have been instructed to come into the office even while lawyers are working remotely, they've said in interviews.
Jake Eletto, the chief of staff at Noor, a recruiting firm that helps find professional staff for Big Law firms, said he's seen "a range of reactions and emotions" from the support staff he works with amid the pandemic.
"Some folks are really concerned about being furloughed or laid off," he wrote in an email March 19, after some firms had switched to working from home but before New York required all nonessential businesses to go remote. "Others are maintaining a positive outlook and expecting it to blow over in a couple weeks."
Since then, some firms—mostly outside Big Law—have already laid off staff. Goldberg Segalla, Belkin Burden Goldman, and Robinson Brog Leinwand Greene Genovese & Gluck have done so, as Law.com reported earlier this week. A new one joined the list Friday, with the small Manhattan real estate firm Heiberger & Associates filing an emergency action in Manhattan seeking to prevent its landlord from drawing down a letter of credit.
The filing included an affidavit from firm leader Jamie Heiberger-Harrison in which she said some staff have been laid off, but the firm can't possibly pay its rent, make payroll and pay other bills with no business coming in as a result of the court closures and economic disruption due to the virus.
There have also been some reports of firms freezing new hires, for both staff and attorneys, according to industry consultants and recruiters.
Jonathan Friedman of Friedman Williams, who places professional staff at law firms in several major markets, said he has seen a mix—some firms are halting searches while others have asked him to continue looking for candidates. And some have pushed forward with high-priority searches while tapping the brakes on other positions, he said.
"Maybe 60% of my clients say, 'we've got to take a couple weeks break. We're freezing all staff hiring,'" he said. "Forty percent of my clients … are saying, 'do not hold anything. We want to still move forward. We're going to do all of our interviewing remotely, either video or phone calls," and either start employees remotely or finish the hiring process later.
IT staff have been a key part of firms' rapid pivot to working from home. Frank Gillman, a former Big Law chief information officer who now works at consulting firm Vertex Advisors, said firms can deploy cloud-based software to manage their teams, documents and workflows within the space of about a week. Staff can be trained for new roles even if the firm is in dire straits, he said. But firms also need to think about coming back from the crisis stronger than before.
"'How we survive' is built into 'how we come back,' anyway," he said.
Not all tech upgrades are emergencies, however, and some firms are pressing ahead with strategic projects they planned before the crisis: Joel Carpenter, the Boston-based managing partner at Sullivan & Worcester, said in a recent interview that he hoped one challenge of remote work—reviews of bills by staff and billing partners—would be improved by upgrading the firm's legal practice management software to Elite 3E, which was already planned for the end of March.
"I wish I had accelerated my Elite conversion," he said. "This entire situation has been an exercise in figuring out a little later than you would like about how difficult this is all going to be."
Correction: A previous version of this story misspelled Gillman's last name. The error has been corrected
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250