From the Editor: In This Crisis, Law Firms Can Shine as Clients' Most Trusted Advisers
One thing that has become clear in recent weeks is the value of a law firm, Gina Passarella writes. And, at the same time, some of its shortcomings.
March 27, 2020 at 10:08 AM
3 minute read
Editor's note: This piece is adapted from editor-in-chief Gina Passarella's introduction to the April edition of The American Lawyer.
During the months we were preparing our annual Dealmakers issue, the world looked a lot different.
The issue addresses very real challenges and opportunities surrounding how deals are getting done. But even as I write this, we can't quite know how deals will be impacted by the coronavirus pandemic.
Many law firms are now requiring their lawyers and staff to work remotely. I'm hunkering down for at least five weeks with the kids home from school, as are workers in several pockets of the country. Grocery store shelves are often empty. Events are being canceled. The National Guard is being called into towns to help. Clients are scrambling to figure out how to move and maintain their supply chains or best protect their workforces, and the health care system is scrambling to prepare for a stress test of possibly unprecedented proportions.
I write this not because it's anything you don't know, but because I wonder how different those facts will be in just a few weeks, let alone a few months. The situation is changing by the hour, and law firms are working overtime to figure out how to both run their own institutions in these challenging times and how to advise their clients to do the same.
In this time of crisis and uncertainty, one thing that has become clear is the value of a law firm. And, at the same time, some of its shortcomings.
There is much talk about how clients are increasingly turning to new providers in an expression of dissatisfaction with the law firm business model. But during a crisis, particularly this one, it is clear that the law firm is where clients are turning.
Clients aren't out searching for new providers right now. They don't have time. They need answers now. And they need answers to really complicated, novel questions. So there is no better place to turn than to their traditional providers. Law firms are the ones able to best navigate the thorny legal issues that surround their clients' business challenges. And they have the infrastructure and manpower to address them. They also have the infrastructure to mobilize pro bono support in the midst of a crisis. As is often the case in times of uncertainty, it is a lawyer and law firm's time to shine—to be that trusted adviser clients are always seeking.
The pandemic exposed some of the flaws in law firms' infrastructure. The main one is around their ability to work remotely en masse. It isn't all about technology. Most firms quickly stress-tested their systems and found them able to support wide-scale remote work. It's more about mindset. Many firms struggled with the idea of closing their offices. Remote depositions didn't exist outside of a crisis. Face time is still valued more than perhaps it should be.
Law firms' expertise will be in high demand for several months, but a recession's impact will again put their business model to the test, particularly for those that focus on corporate work. Firms that can balance the trusted adviser role with a forward-thinking business model will be ahead of the curve. After all, as this crisis shows, it's the law firm's relationship to lose.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250