Rethinking Law Firm Real Estate When the Office Is Empty
Will the sudden shift to remote working accelerate the trends that are transforming modern law offices?
March 27, 2020 at 04:08 PM
5 minute read
A law firm's offices have always been more than a workplace, with firms using prestigious addresses, tony art collections and sweeping views to send an unmistakable message to clients and recruits: Trust your problems, or your career, to us.
Those days will return, hopefully, sooner rather than later. For now, the trappings of physical office space—aside from technological infrastructure—don't mean a whole lot. No one is there. No one is coming to visit. But the firms are still paying for it.
April Vasquez Leibman, a commercial real estate partner at Texas law firm Jackson Walker who works with law firms on their real estate investments, said that a preexisting trend toward reduced square footage per lawyer and more collaborative spaces could be accelerated by mandated work-from-home policies.
"Working from home used to be just for the lawyers," she said. "Now maybe we do it for staff as well. If this forced experiment works, it could expand that to paralegals and staff as well."
Commercial real estate firm CBRE released a report in November 2019 detailing changes in law firm real estate usage across U.S. markets, noting trends from smaller offices to shifting destinations in various markets.
In Manhattan, for example, 25% (about 8.5 million) of the 35 million square feet of commercial space occupied by law firms will be up for renewal between 2021 and 2024, according to CBRE. Law firms renewed, expanded, contracted and relocated office space totaling 1.3 million square feet in Manhattan from the third quarter of 2018 through the second quarter of 2019.
In Philadelphia, Post & Schell, Holland & Knight and DLA Piper all had leases renewing (with Holland & Knight expanding its footprint) between Q3 of 2019 and the end of Q2 2020.
In Chicago, Perkins Coie and Jones Day are both relocating in the West Loop in that same time frame, both with over 100,000 square feet of space. Both leases were signed in late 2019, with Jones Day slated to move into 110 Wacker Dr. in late 2020, while Perkins Coie will move in to the new space in late 2021.
CBRE noted that some firms have been exploring shorter leases and shared spaces, but that isn't the norm, at least not yet.
But Vasquez Leibman thinks that will change, and quickly.
"Smart firms will start to look for options in their leases," she said. "Expansions, reductions in space, rights of first refusal. They will need to keep their options open."
While law firms are fortunate in that much of the work they do can be done remotely, the overhead of unused real estate looms large.
The November study showed that firms as a whole have been decreasing their real estate footprint nationally before the COVID-19 outbreak, and the epidemic doesn't seem likely to change that trend.
CBRE, in a statement this week, said it expects that office leasing overall will decrease in the short term, vacancies will rise and more and more entities will be looking for shared or "agile" workplace offerings.
The real estate firm also said that in general, commercial real estate transactions have slowed, bidding pools are smaller and the number of entities bringing property to market has slowed. There have also been increases in repricing asks.
Vasquez said that while she expects some landlords to strictly enforce lease contracts in the short term, she also expects the majority will be flexible about working with their tenants, if only out of fear the tenant might make a move when the dust clears or even go bankrupt if they are forced to continue paying full rent.
While the latter scenario is not likely for very large law firms, the former has very real potential.
Rick Barkham, global chief economist and chief of Americas research at CBRE, said in an email that he expects the commercial real estate market to take a hit from the current crisis, but that it would begin to see a recovery by the end of the year.
Will law firms be comfortably back to their old office ways by then, or will their approaches be transformed?
"It's only been a couple of weeks," Vasquez Leibman said. "Once we know how long this may last, there may be firmer points or opinions. But right now, it is full speculation."
|Read More:
Rents Rise—and Lease Expirations Loom—for New York Law Firms
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllMeet the Finalists: The American Lawyer's Young Lawyers of The Year
Latham Departures Continue as Capital Markets Partner Joins Greenberg Traurig
2 minute readHSF's American Dream: What Will a U.S. Merger Mean For its Asia Practice?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Ed Sheeran Meets Led Zeppelin in the Second Circuit
- 2You Too Can Be a Programmer: How Generative AI Can Upskill Any E-Discovery Professional to Write Code
- 3Is Arbitration Working?
- 4New Battleground: Wall Street Law Firms Eye London Growth
- 5Standstill: Court Defers to Legislature on Texas Healthcare
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250