With Pros and Olympics Delayed, Sports Lawyers Plot Out the Long Game for Their Practices
While some sports-related work will slow, lawyers will be called in to broker cooperation in rescheduling major athletic competitions.
March 31, 2020 at 12:34 PM
6 minute read
The first domino to fall was the suspension of the NBA season. Shortly after, the NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament was nixed. MLB's spring training was shortened, then the season delayed. And now, the 2020 Summer Olympics in Tokyo have been pushed to 2021.
While every industry is dealing with massive upheaval, few are as visible as sports and entertainment. While many who practice in this area anticipate a slowdown in overall legal work, certain pockets of work are being pushed to the forefront, creating demand for the services these attorneys provide.
Steve Smith, managing partner of Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner's Colorado Springs, Colorado, office and partner in the firm's sports law practice, said he is anticipating a slowdown in work, but not a huge one.
"I'm sort of expecting a bit of a downturn, but the nice thing of being in the legal profession is that if things are good, people are doing more deals," Smith said in an interview. "If things are down, they need help to make things work. That's the benefit we have."
Michael Kuh, a New York-based partner at Hogan Lovells who has worked with Olympic committees and major sports franchises, said there has been a slight decrease in work at his practice. But more so, he's just been focusing on different issues.
"I've been spending time advising clients as they think through health and safety issues for their employees and remote deployment," Kuh said, "and more recently about what federal and state benefits may be available to them."
Kuh said he expects legal work surrounding sponsorship expansions and new ventures to come to a standstill, but contract review work to increase. Thus far, Kuh said, everyone has been playing the long game when it comes to handling matters, noting that relationships are king in the sporting world.
"They are working cooperatively with one another to make it through to the next day," Kuh said. "We have not seen—not yet anyway—any real uptick in clients taking adversarial positions."
While three of the four major American sports leagues are dealing with some degree of delay in their seasons (the NFL, as of yet, has not postponed the start of its 2020 season), the biggest news of late was the announcement that the 2020 Olympics have been postponed until 2021.
Bryan Cave's Smith, who represents international federations and national governing bodies in the Olympic movement, said he was not surprised the games were moved to next year.
"It's easy to be critical, and maybe they waited a bit too long to make the decision," Smith said. But "I don't have complaints about how they handled it. It isn't a U2 concert that you can just move to a later date."
Jon Israel, New York-based partner at Foley & Lardner and co-chair of the firm's sports industry practice, said the number of issues that will need to be sorted out regarding the Olympic postponement should create a lot of work for sports attorneys.
"What do you do with the athletes who have trained so hard?" he said. "How do you do qualifying events? Sponsors are all lined up. What happens with them?"
Smith said that the force majeure clause in contracts, normally an afterthought during the negotiation process, is now in full view.
Force majeure is "historically one of the least paid-attention-to clauses," Smith said. "Not now."
While there are sure to be numerous negotiations around how sponsors, athletes, governing bodies and the host city and country are to be made whole, Smith, like Kuh, said if his dealings with other entities around contract renegotiations are any indication, he expects that everyone will play nice and be understanding.
"People are being pretty reasonable about it," he said. "They know the Olympics can't be done this year, so let's make this work for 2021. Fortunately people are being realistic about it. They realize they will have to do business with these people again."
The games, now slated to begin July 23, 2021, will cost an additional $3 billion to $6 billion dollars, according to a report from ESPN.
Sifting through the various sponsorship contracts, totaling over $3.3 billion and more than twice that of previous Olympics, will require lawyers. Broadcasting rights and renegotiation over such things as use of the Olympic Village, built to house over 11,000 athletes in apartments that were to be sold after the games, will create more legal work.
Smith estimated that the Olympic governing bodies in the U.S., of which there are 45, will lose an estimated $120 million, leading him to wonder whether those organizations will be able to recoup the loss or simply write it off.
Israel, of Foley & Lardner, mentioned that the fallout from cancellations hits not only the sports leagues and teams, but the ecosystem of venues, retailers, restaurants and bars and people that work in the arenas.
Some changes to the sporting world already in progress, such as the rising popularity of esports, might have their flames fanned by the current ban on large gatherings, a key component of sporting events.
But Israel believes that, in time, a return to sport will see fans back in the stands.
"Habits will change from these circumstances," Israel said. "We will probably see more of an online consumer of sports. But nothing can replicate the stadium experience. That stuff will never go away."
|Read More
US Soccer Taps Latham After Arguing Women Players Are Less Skilled Than Men
Foley Bets On Sports Practice, Lands Ex-Jets GC
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllWhat Does the Opening of Brazil's Gambling Market Mean For Global Firms?
The Law Firm Disrupted: Some Super Bowl Fun and Games in Big Law
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1$83M Verdict After $100K Demand Rejected in Henry County
- 2Samsung Flooded With Galaxy Product Patent Lawsuits in Texas Federal Court
- 3How Marsh McLennan's Small But Mighty Legal Innovation Team Builds Solutions That Bring Joy
- 4On the Move and After Hours: Brach Eichler; Cooper Levenson; Marshall Dennehey; Archer; Sills Cummis
- 5Review of Ex-parte orders by the Appellate Division
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250