Law Firm Merger Numbers Drop as Pandemic Takes Hold
Second-quarter numbers are likely to plummet further, according to Altman Weil and Fairfax Associates.
April 01, 2020 at 06:05 PM
3 minute read
The COVID-19 pandemic is putting law firm merger activity on ice, according to two consultancies that track such deals.
The effects of the international outbreak of the coronavirus can be seen in the first-quarter data collected by Altman Weil. The consultancy tracked only 17 U.S. law firm merger announcements during the first quarter, a 37% drop from Q1 2019.
Eleven of those merger announcements came in January; at that point, reported virus cases were mostly confined to China. Merger announcement activity had slowed by the end of February, and in March, the only law firm combination announced was the tie-up of two small New York firms.
"These are lawyers. Lawyers are not inclined to make risky moves in an uncertain environment," said Altman Weil principal Eric Seeger.
Fairfax Associates—which measures finalized mergers rather than newly announced deals—tracked 21 completed mergers last quarter. That's lower than the 25 deals that were inked in Q1 2019, but it's higher than Fairfax's 10-year average for the first quarter.
Many of the mergers were likely reached long before the coronavirus gripped the country's attention. "Q1 is not going to be a strong indicator of what's going to happen in the next couple of quarters," said Fairfax Associates principal Lisa Smith.
Both Seeger and Smith separately said they expect lower second-quarter merger numbers. The pandemic has already affected at least one previously announced merger—Troutman Sanders and Pepper Hamilton announced in March that they were postponing their merger by three months, from April 1 to July 1.
Altman Weil and Fairfax Associates said law firms are still interested in merging and combining with others, but the coronavirus has put a dampener on that activity. For one, law firm mergers require an element of face-to-face contact and in-person meetings; like other industries, Big Law has transitioned to remote work in an effort to stop the virus from spreading and infecting others.
But the pandemic's economic fallout means that law firm leaders are preoccupied with how their own business is doing. Some firms have already begun to lay off staff, pause partner draws and cut staff salaries in response to the pandemic.
That atmosphere means law firms are unlikely to acquire smaller firms and groups or bring on lateral partners, both Smith and Seeger said. However, they noted that, at this point, law firms are adding lateral partners who were well into the hiring process before the pandemic's effects began bearing down on law firms in late March.
"It doesn't look good when you're laying people off over here and you're adding people over there," Seeger said. "Acquisitions require management attention that just isn't available right now."
Despite the cuts law firms are making in response to the pandemic, it also creates buying and acquisition opportunities as well, Smith said. It also might expose how precarious a firm's financial health might be in an economic downturn, she added.
"In a few months, we might see some firms that are in need of saving," Smith said.
Read More
'Survival Mode' Is Now for Some Law Firms, While Others Plan and Wait
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid to Practice Law in U.S. on Indefinite Hold, as Arizona Justices Exercise Caution
Orrick Hires Longtime Weil Partner as New Head of Antitrust Litigation
Sidley Adds Ex-DOJ Criminal Division Deputy Leader, Paul Hastings Adds REIT Partner, in Latest DC Hiring
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Justice Department Sues to Block $14 Billion Juniper Buyout by Hewlett Packard Enterprise
- 2A Texas Lawyer Just Rose to the Trump Administration
- 3Hogan Lovells Hires White & Case Corporate and Finance Team in Italy
- 4New York District Attorneys Endorse Governor's Proposed Rollback of Discovery Reforms
- 5Greenberg Traurig Launches Munich Office with Eight Hires, Including McDermott Group
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250