'Strong, Big-Name Firms' Are Looking at Imminent Cuts to Partner Draws, Consultant Says
To deal with economic uncertainty, industry adviser Kent Zimmermann said Am Law 100 firms are seriously considering numerous meaningful cost-cutting options.
April 01, 2020 at 01:43 PM
5 minute read
Cutting partner draws by as much as 50% in the near future is one option Am Law 100 firm leaders are considering to ensure the financial viability of their firms as the new coronavirus, and the stay-home orders intended to help slow its spread, continue to affect the economy.
Kent Zimmermann, a consultant at Zeughauser Group, said he spoke with the chairs of multiple Am Law 100 firms on Tuesday who said they are "close" to cutting partner draws within the next 30 days by as much as 50%, depending on their firm's revenue forecast for the next few months. He said some firms are predicting a modest revenue decline over the next few months, while others are looking at a drop-off in the 50% range, he said.
"These are strong, name-brand firms," he said.
Temporarily reducing the money going to equity partners is just one action law firm chairs and managing partners are considering right now while economic conditions are uncertain, Zimmermann said. Other options are deferring 2019 distributions that haven't been paid yet; reducing lawyer and staff head count; instituting mandatory reduced workweeks paired with a proportional compensation decrease; mandatory or temporary leaves of absence; and delaying or shortening summer associate programs.
Zimmermann said something that doesn't get a lot of attention during the good times is that the profit margins of Am Law 200 firms vary widely, from more than 50% among the most profitable firms down to 20% or less. "That causes a big difference in how much money you have to work with, or how much room you have to maneuver, when revenue may be down materially," he said.
While a number of large and midsize firms have already made decisions to lay off employees, cut pay or reduce partner draws, Zimmermann said firms really don't want to lead the industry in these unpopular actions for fear it's a sign of weakness.
But firm leaders are eager to talk to others about options and what they all face in these uncertain times, he said, noting that 45 or 50 Am Law 100 chairs and managing partners participated in a virtual meeting on Friday organized by Zeughauser Group.
Discussions during that chat were off-the-record, Zimmermann said, but based on individual conversations he's had with firm leaders, a lot of options are on the table.
Many firms are still collecting on pre-COVID-19 work, lawyers remain busy with work in progress, and some firms are "closing out March and like what they see," he noted. But, Zimmermann said, "There is concern at many well-run firms that they shouldn't get lulled into a false sense of security, because April, May, June may be worse."
He said the timeline for action varies, and some firms are simply having more open discussions with employees about what may be in the works.
"Some firms have been extremely transparent in telling both the attorneys and the staff that the options are on the table," he said, noting that those firms typically have a history of transparency. But other firms are wary of making statements to lawyers and employees before decisions are made because they want to keep their options open, he said.
The list of Am Law 200 firms whose cost-cutting actions have become public grew on Wednesday with Baker Donelson, which has cut partner draws and plans to temporarily reduce salaries and furlough some employees. Others taking action include Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft, Reed Smith, Womble Bond Dickinson, and Goldberg Segalla, and some midsize firms.
As for hiring in the near term, Zimmermann said firms are realizing it's not "business as usual" but they face a decision in what to do about summer associate programs.
"The prevailing [question] is whether we delay the start of our summer program, or we just have a two-week boot camp at summer's end … or we just cancel," Zimmermann said.
Zimmermann said his advice to firms is to let associates know that even if the summer program is changed, they will still be hiring for the next fall. During the 2008-09 recession, some firms did not do that, and it may have affected their reputation at some law schools, he said.
Read More
Cadwalader Halts Partner Pay, Cuts Associate and Staff Compensation
Reed Smith Will 'Slow' Partner Pay in Response to COVID-19 Pressures
Womble Lays Off Some Employees, Cuts Lawyer and Staff Pay Amid Pandemic
'Survival Mode' Is Now for Some Law Firms, While Others Plan and Wait
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDechert 'Spark Tank' Competition Encourages Firmwide Innovation Focus
Akerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Growing PFAS Morass: Why Insurance Should Cover These Products Liability Claims
- 2Dallas Jury Awards $98.65M in Botham Jean Killing by Dallas Officer
- 3In Talc Bankruptcy, Andy Birchfield Skipped His Deposition. Could He Face Sanctions?
- 4Pharmaceutical Patents: Benefits and Challenges
- 5Where Do Web-Tracking Class Actions Belong? 8th Circuit Weighs the Issue
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250