New Study Finds Associates Like Their Partners, but Not Vice Versa
A survey of nearly 1,400 partners and more than 1,000 associates at regional, national and elite law firms reveals that most partners don't think that their associates work as hard as they did at that stage of their careers, and many partners think today's associates are not as good at their jobs and are less committed to their work.
April 02, 2020 at 01:00 AM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Law.com
|
Today's law firm associates have generally positive things to say about the partners they work for. Unfortunately, that admiration isn't reciprocal.
A new, large-scale survey reveals that most partners don't think that their associates work as hard as they did at that stage of their careers, and many partners think today's associates are not as good at their jobs and are less committed to their work.
The report, titled "Multiple Generations In Law Firms: Working Together," is a collaboration between the National Association for Law Placement (NALP) and law firm consulting firm PP&C. Researchers gathered survey responses from nearly 1,400 partners and more than 1,000 associates at regional, national and elite law firms in 2019 in a bid to better understand the generational dynamics at play in those workplaces.
Among the major findings is that law firm partners have remarkably similar views about their work, whether they are baby boomers soon to retire or millennials who have only recently joined the partnership ranks. Millennial partners are more likely to work from home, and they tend to have somewhat higher opinions of associates than their older colleagues. But partners across generations are remarkably similar when it comes to being committed to and satisfied with their work.
"The oldest members of the millennial generation have become partners at major U.S. law firms," the report reads. "It turns out that these new partners share most of the attitudes and habits of the partners they are replacing or joining."
The report also offers an in-depth look at how associates feel about their jobs and their career aspirations. In general, they like the partners at their firm. Only 9% of the associate respondents listed partners when asked what they dislike about their firms, and 45% listed partners among the top four responses when asked what they most like.
Yet a large percentage of associates don't aspire to join the partner ranks. Fully 59% of the respondents said they don't want to become partners at their current firm, while 41% said they do. First-year associates were the least likely to report wanting to be partner, and that percentage steadily increased through the ranks of senior associates.
"I suspected that it was a minority of associates who were in for the long run and were prepared to make the sacrifices, work hard, and love it enough to compete for partnership," said Aric Press, a partner at PP&C and co-author of the report. "But I was surprised that is was 59% saying, 'No, I don't aspire to that.' And the numbers were particularly low in New York and at the economic elite firms. Which, when I thought about it, was probably not that surprising given that those are the most intense places." (Press is former editor-in-chief of Law.com affiliate The American Lawyer.)
The report suggests that law firms find opportunities to retain those associates who don't want to pursue the partnership track.
"This may be an opportune moment to seriously consider structures that allow firms to focus more development effort on those interested in partnership, while providing alternative career paths within the firm for talented, valuable lawyers who don't wish for the partnership life," the report reads.
A smaller percentage of women than men said they want to be partner—they comprised 46% of that group. Latinx associates also reported a higher percentage of partner aspirations than any other group, followed by black associates, at 60% and 46%, respectively, compared to 42% among white associates.
"The most surprising finding to me, and certainly among the most important findings, is the finding that black and Latinx associates are more likely than white associates to aspire to become partners at their current firms," said NALP executive director James Leipold.
The report also looked at how happy—or not—lawyers of different generations and at different stages in their career report to be. Baby boomers reported the highest levels of happiness among partners, while Generation X partners reported the lowest. That result may well come from the fact that baby boomers are nearing retirement, while many of the nuts and bolts of running a firm now fall on Gen Xers, the report notes. Overall, associates were the least happy group, with women associates reporting the lowest happiness rates.
The report also highlights some interesting findings on how partners view associates. Just 56% of the surveyed partners said today's associates are as good as they are, and that figure was just 29% among Gen X partners. Among all partners, 40% said associates expect too much of their law firms, and 37% said associates put their own needs and interests ahead of their firm and clients.
"To review, a substantial percentage of partners appear to be disappointed in their associates," the report reads. "A majority don't think today's young lawyers work as hard as they did. A substantial minority think young lawyers are not as skilled as they were. And about a third find their associates selfish."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCleary Creates Nonequity Partner Tier, Calling For 'Innovation and Adaptation'
5 minute readAs Law Firms Set Partner Comp and Budgets for 2025, Leadership Manages Expectations
6 minute readAssistant Solicitor General Heads to Paul Hastings to Co-Chair Appellate Practice
3 minute readEpstein Becker Green Expands in Portland With Lane Powell Trio
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft and Pryor Cashman have entered appearances for Diageo Americas Supply d/b/a Ciroc Distilling Co. and Sony Songs, a division of Sony Music Publishing, respectively, in a pending lawsuit. The case was filed Sept. 10 in New York Southern District Court by the Bloom Firm and IP Legal Studio on behalf of Dawn Angelique Richard. The plaintiff, who performed as a member of producer Sean 'Diddy' Combs girl group Danity Kane and later his band, Diddy - Dirty Money, claims that she was financially exploited by Combs and subjected to inhumane working conditions. Among other violations, Richard claims that Combs required group members to remain at his residences and studios, deprived them of adequate food and sleep and forced them to rehearse for 36 to 48 hours without breaks. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Katherine Polk Failla, is 1:24-cv-06848, Richard v. Combs et al.
Who Got The Work
Mathilda McGee-Tubb and Kevin M. McGinty of Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, as well as Jesse W. Belcher-Timme of Doherty, Wallace, Pillsbury & Murphy, have stepped in to defend Peter Pan Bus Lines in a pending consumer class action. The suit, filed Sept. 4 in Massachusetts District Court by Hackett Feinberg PC and KalielGold PLLC, accuses the defendant of charging undisclosed 'junk fees' on top of ticket prices during checkout. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Mark G. Mastroianni, is 3:24-cv-12277, Mulani et al v. Peter Pan Bus Lines, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250