The Case for Saving Summer Programs
In response for calls to do away with law firm summer associate programs this year, consultant Grover Cleveland explains why firms should keep them.
April 06, 2020 at 01:13 PM
4 minute read
"When written in Chinese, the word 'crisis' is composed of two characters. One represents danger and the other represents opportunity." – John F. Kennedy
The issue is mettle. The world's largest law firms rightfully cultivate reputations for overcoming adversity. Big Law is tenacious in crafting solutions to clients' impossible problems. And Big Law prides itself on innovation.
In the throes of uncertainty, canceling summer associate programs may seem logical. Indeed, writing in The American Lawyer, Hugh Simons encourages that path.
Not so fast. The cost would be real. In this environment, actions to help maintain normalcy generate copious goodwill. And firms have already proved that remote work can work.
Promising offers in lieu of a summer program is not a panacea. No one can predict what the legal market will look like in 12 months. And in the last recession, firms learned that rescinding offers only makes matters worse.
Years after the 2009 recession, I met with the career office at one of the nation's top law schools. With robotic precision, the law school career advisers ticked off how various firms had treated "their" law students in the wake of that downturn. They had kept score. And they insisted that women and minorities had fared worse.
Incoming summer associate classes are more diverse than ever. Many firms have started or expanded diversity fellowships and summer programs for first-generation lawyers. These are the same students who are now so concerned and confused.
As a former law firm partner, I recognize the imperative to conserve cash. But the current crisis also reminds me of sage advice from a recruiting manager at an Am Law 50 firm: "If there is a fire, partners want associates who will walk toward the fire."
A billboard on a normally busy Seattle thoroughfare proclaims: "Now is the Time to Stand Out." And many of the country's most prestigious law firms are striving to make virtual summer programs succeed. The logistical issues are the same ones that firms have already solved for their full-time professionals, such as providing secure network access. And firms already have years of experience distributing assignments by email.
With travel and entertainment off the table, virtual programs will cost far less than traditional programs. Some firms are also shortening their programs, reducing costs even more.
There are creative ways to pull off a summer program and save money. Programming can be webcast and meetings can be virtual. Even the social aspects are not insurmountable.
Under the circumstances, no solution is perfect. Every choice is challenging. But firms now have a unique opportunity to demonstrate ingenuity. That trait is on display from institutions around the globe. The Rotterdam Philharmonic Orchestra played Beethoven—from home. Virtual happy hours happen every day. And virtual team-building exercises are not new.
Firms can use mobile apps to create virtual scavenger hunts. Summer associates can work on teams to complete challenges, gathering information about firm lawyers and firm history. Photos document the completion of each successful challenge, and the apps automatically tally the results. This is just one example.
Pressing on with summer programs will show the best of Big Law. And the programs will give brilliant law students the real-world experience they were promised. This is paramount for first-generation and diverse candidates.
Just as there is a business case for pro bono, there is a business case for not canceling summer. There are no easy answers. But if firms drop summer programs entirely, some will say that COVID-19 has won.
Grover Cleveland is the founder and principal of Lessons for Sharks LLC and the author of Swimming Lessons for Baby Sharks: The Essential Guide to Thriving as a New Lawyer. He provides interactive programs on law career success for Am Law 200 firms. Grover is a former partner at Foster Garvey in Seattle, where his clients included the Seattle Seahawks. He is not related to the 22nd and 24th President of the United States.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Trending Stories
- 1Arnold & Porter Matches Market Year-End Bonus, Requires Billable Threshold for Special Bonuses
- 2Advising 'Capital-Intensive Spaces' Fuels Corporate Practice Growth For Haynes and Boone
- 3Big Law’s Year—as Told in Commentaries
- 4Pa. Hospital Agrees to $16M Settlement Following High Schooler's Improper Discharge
- 5Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250