The Case for Saving Summer Programs
In response for calls to do away with law firm summer associate programs this year, consultant Grover Cleveland explains why firms should keep them.
April 06, 2020 at 01:13 PM
4 minute read
"When written in Chinese, the word 'crisis' is composed of two characters. One represents danger and the other represents opportunity." – John F. Kennedy
The issue is mettle. The world's largest law firms rightfully cultivate reputations for overcoming adversity. Big Law is tenacious in crafting solutions to clients' impossible problems. And Big Law prides itself on innovation.
In the throes of uncertainty, canceling summer associate programs may seem logical. Indeed, writing in The American Lawyer, Hugh Simons encourages that path.
Not so fast. The cost would be real. In this environment, actions to help maintain normalcy generate copious goodwill. And firms have already proved that remote work can work.
Promising offers in lieu of a summer program is not a panacea. No one can predict what the legal market will look like in 12 months. And in the last recession, firms learned that rescinding offers only makes matters worse.
Years after the 2009 recession, I met with the career office at one of the nation's top law schools. With robotic precision, the law school career advisers ticked off how various firms had treated "their" law students in the wake of that downturn. They had kept score. And they insisted that women and minorities had fared worse.
Incoming summer associate classes are more diverse than ever. Many firms have started or expanded diversity fellowships and summer programs for first-generation lawyers. These are the same students who are now so concerned and confused.
As a former law firm partner, I recognize the imperative to conserve cash. But the current crisis also reminds me of sage advice from a recruiting manager at an Am Law 50 firm: "If there is a fire, partners want associates who will walk toward the fire."
A billboard on a normally busy Seattle thoroughfare proclaims: "Now is the Time to Stand Out." And many of the country's most prestigious law firms are striving to make virtual summer programs succeed. The logistical issues are the same ones that firms have already solved for their full-time professionals, such as providing secure network access. And firms already have years of experience distributing assignments by email.
With travel and entertainment off the table, virtual programs will cost far less than traditional programs. Some firms are also shortening their programs, reducing costs even more.
There are creative ways to pull off a summer program and save money. Programming can be webcast and meetings can be virtual. Even the social aspects are not insurmountable.
Under the circumstances, no solution is perfect. Every choice is challenging. But firms now have a unique opportunity to demonstrate ingenuity. That trait is on display from institutions around the globe. The Rotterdam Philharmonic Orchestra played Beethoven—from home. Virtual happy hours happen every day. And virtual team-building exercises are not new.
Firms can use mobile apps to create virtual scavenger hunts. Summer associates can work on teams to complete challenges, gathering information about firm lawyers and firm history. Photos document the completion of each successful challenge, and the apps automatically tally the results. This is just one example.
Pressing on with summer programs will show the best of Big Law. And the programs will give brilliant law students the real-world experience they were promised. This is paramount for first-generation and diverse candidates.
Just as there is a business case for pro bono, there is a business case for not canceling summer. There are no easy answers. But if firms drop summer programs entirely, some will say that COVID-19 has won.
Grover Cleveland is the founder and principal of Lessons for Sharks LLC and the author of Swimming Lessons for Baby Sharks: The Essential Guide to Thriving as a New Lawyer. He provides interactive programs on law career success for Am Law 200 firms. Grover is a former partner at Foster Garvey in Seattle, where his clients included the Seattle Seahawks. He is not related to the 22nd and 24th President of the United States.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGovernment Attorneys Face Reassignment, Rescinded Job Offers in First Days of Trump Administration
4 minute readEnergy Lawyers Field Client Questions as Trump Issues Executive Orders on Industry Funding, Oversight
6 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250