A Spike in Revenue, Followed by Pay Cuts: Arent Fox Reflects the Industry's Turn
The firm's strong performance in 2019 had leaders eying new markets, including a presence in Chicago. Now it is cutting pay across the board.
April 07, 2020 at 01:06 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Washington, D.C.-based Arent Fox grew its revenue by double digits while seeing a healthy boost in profits in 2019—the first full year of its combination with a smaller Boston firm.
Then the 2020 pandemic hit, shuttering about a quarter of the U.S. economy. Arent Fox, like many other firms, has made cost-cutting moves, such as 25% pay cuts for associates and staff and 60% reduction in equity partner distributions, according to Above the Law.
A firm spokesman said in a statement that in response to the economic slowdown, the firm made a "temporary pay cut for all attorneys, professionals, and staff."
The firm's leadership "recognizes that the biggest financial risk to a law firm is underreacting," the statement said. "Our goal is to put Arent Fox in a strong position so that we can continue to provide critical, first-rate service to our clients as we help them navigate" challenges from the crisis.
The firm's experience underlines how quickly the economic fallout of the pandemic has stricken the industry—even Am Law 200 firms with healthy profit margins. Arent Fox's profit margins dipped slightly in 2019 but were above 30%.
The firm's gross revenue shot up by 15.4% to $326 million in 2019, when its combination with 55-lawyer firm Posternak Blankstein & Lund became effective. The Posternak firm's legacy revenue was about $29 million, the firm said last month, while the combination generated an additional $3 million in work in the first year.
Revenue per lawyer, at $847,000, was flat amid a 15% increase in head count to 385 attorneys. Even with the head count bump, the firm's equity tier stayed flat at 96 partners, making profits per equity partner grow 7.5% to $1.042 million.
In an interview on March 11—before quarantine orders and court shutdowns across the country—the firm's leaders sounded optimistic based on last year's performance. Chair Mark Katz said all the firm's departments outperformed the firm's budget in 2019. Managing partner Cristina Carvalho said the firm's Boston office immediately started working with firm as a whole, "and even though it was year one, there was a lot of collaboration."
The Posternak firm's bench of real estate translational and corporate lawyers, including venture capital and early company formation, was a "perfect match" for Arent Fox's regulatory expertise, Carvalho said.
One example of the client work the combined firm generated was working for a biotech company in Massachusetts, Tevard Biosciences. With Arent Fox's existing Food and Drug Administration expertise, the combined firm could also offer corporate advice from Boston, Carvalho said.
Among other matters last year, the firm's corporate department represented District Photo in Apollo's acquisition of Snapfish and its merger into Shutterfly, and its government contracts lawyers guided longtime client Unisys through a $1.2 billion sale of its Federal business to SAIC.
The Posternak merger exceeded the firms' projections in terms of hours billed and other measures, such as successful lateral recruitment, Katz said. The merger had gone so well that Arent Fox leaders were considering other locations. Last month, Katz expressed an interest in the Chicago market, noting it "it would be a logical step" to have a presence there.
But even last month, Katz acknowledged, "all the forward guidance we have is on hold at the moment." He added, "We put out a budget at the beginning of the year that we expect revenue to be X, and this year it's anyone's guess."
"The impact of the virus is going to hit everyone, so we just have to what 2020 is in store for us," Katz said.
|Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDechert 'Spark Tank' Competition Encourages Firmwide Innovation Focus
Akerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome', DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250