'There Isn't Going To Be a Magic Formula': How One Am Law 200 Firm Is Calibrating Cuts
Sullivan & Worcester managing partner Joel Carpenter said the firm's actions—including temporary pay cuts and some furloughs—is based on a 40% drop in revenue that he hopes won't come to pass.
April 07, 2020 at 05:52 PM
4 minute read
Joining a parade of law firms that have adopted cost-cutting measures to mitigate the financial fallout from COVID-19, Sullivan & Worcester managing partner Joel Carpenter told the firm this week that it would adopt several austerity measures in the months ahead.
In addition to general discretionary expense cutting, Carpenter said the Boston-based firm has furloughed a number of employees for 90 days with full benefits, and it has instituted temporary pay cuts across much of the firm. Employees making less than $66,000 per year will not be affected, while staff members making above that amount will see a 5% reduction in salary. Non-equity partners will see a 10% reduction, while equity partners will see a 20% decrease from their monthly draws.
All of the cuts are temporary, Carpenter said, with the firm anticipating it will lift the measures in 90 days, if not sooner.
"There isn't going to be a magic formula here," Carpenter said in an interview. "We don't have a crystal ball. The exercise we went through took a look at our budget, and we need to assume significant decreases in revenue over the next several months at least."
Carpenter said the firm examined its March performance and found that it came in at about 97% of budget, while billings exceeded expectations. But, it also showed only 84% of expected revenue, which was a concern so early in the year, Carpenter said.
The firm has taken a data-driven, somewhat conservative approach to modeling the pandemic's impact on its finances.
"We took a stress test for a 40% revenue decline, which we hope is worse than we experience," Carpenter said.
The firm performed a month-by-month cash flow analysis, and after cutting discretionary spending, it also looked for nondiscretionary spending that could be postponed, such as a pending technology upgrade that—while necessary—wasn't urgent.
"That is where you start, as it is the most painless," Carpenter said.
The furloughs were limited to those who could "not effectively work from home," he said, declining to say how many were affected.
"They are people we value a lot, and we are committed to rehiring them," Carpenter said.
The rest of the budget adjustment would need to come from individual earnings, he said.
Carpenter said the pay cuts announced Monday are enough for the firm to continue operating comfortably through the summer, at which point it will reevaluate its options.
"It wasn't designed to save a specific dollar amount," Carpenter said of the package of measures. "We needed to know what we needed to feel comfortable for the next six months, so we went that far. We will examine it every month."
Carpenter said the varying depths of the pay cuts—from 20% for equity partners down to zero for some employees—were meant to minimize the disruption in people's lives as they work to get through unprecedented times.
"The more you make the more you can afford to be reduced," Carpenter said of the cuts. "It was a balance between what is prudent as an organization and recognizing that people have their own bills to pay."
Carpenter said he's sure the benefit of hindsight will reveal that the firm either under- or overreacted to some extent. He said basing Sullivan & Worcester's response on other law firms' moves wouldn't be prudent given their differing mix of practices, financial health, overhead and cash flow.
"I can't truly be a smart observer of what other firms are doing," Carpenter said. "I assume they are doing more or less what they can."
Sullivan & Worcester has also been evaluating its summer associate program, which would normally kick off next month. Its preference is to keep the program in place, Carpenter said, and the firm has been in touch with candidates. A remote program, temporary postponement or outright cancellation may be necessary, he acknowledged.
Sullivan & Worcester was first included in the Am Law 200 a dozen years ago, and is currently ranked at No. 193 based on its 2018 revenue. It saw growth last year, with overall revenue up 6.6% to $111 million and profits per equity partner up 3.5% to $894,000.
|Read More:
Pay Cuts, Layoffs, and More: How Law Firms Are Managing the Pandemic
Thoughts on Alternatives to Canceling Summer Programs
As US Unemployment Soars, Legal Industry Hopes to Avoid Widespread Layoffs
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250