Orrick Cuts Salaries, Delays First-Year Associate Start Dates to 2021
Like many other firms that have recently announced cost-cutting measures, Orrick chair Mitch Zuklie said in a statement that the economic impact on Orrick is unclear and that the cuts were implemented now in order to save jobs in the future.
April 08, 2020 at 05:51 PM
4 minute read
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe appears to be the first firm to announce it will delay its incoming first-year associate class until 2021 as a result of the economic impact of the coronavirus.
The firm confirmed the move along with several other cost-cutting measures aimed at combating the coronavirus' impact on the firm's 2020 financial performance. Those other measures include reducing pay for U.S. attorneys and staff firmwide and reducing some staff hours.
The salary cuts will begin Wednesday through the end of the year. Orrick will also reduce hours for many staff members and alter its 2020 summer associate program. The firm said it is not planning to furlough or lay off employees. The cuts were first reported by Above the Law on Wednesday.
In a statement, chairman Mitch Zuklie said, "We will postpone the start of our 2020 associate class to January 2021, or after postponed bar exams, and we intend to offer some pro bono fellowships."
In the more immediate term, associates and staff will see pay cuts on a graduated scale: 5% for careers associates, 10% for associates and 15% for senior associates and many of counsel. Staff will see a scale of cuts ranging from 1% for the most junior members to 15% for senior staff members.
A "small percentage of staff" will also see reductions in hours starting May 1 until September. Secretaries will work on an 80%, four-day-a-week schedule, which translates to salary cuts between 7% and 17%—although the firm says the vast majority will see cuts of 15% or less.
Partners, of counsel and executive staff will see "deeper cuts." The firm would not elaborate on what those reductions are.
The firm also said it will conduct its 2020 summer associate program virtually and shorten the program's length to five weeks. It is giving permanent offers now to 2L law students to return to the firm as associates after graduation and is giving current 1Ls offers to return to the firm next summer.
Like many other firms that have recently announced cost-cutting measures, Orrick's Zuklie said in a statement that the economic impact on Orrick is unclear and that the cuts were implemented now in order to save jobs in the future and ensure that employees still have access to company-sponsored health insurance. He also added that the new policy is flexible and can be changed at any time.
"As a demonstration that we are in this together as one team, our most senior team members will make the greatest sacrifices," Zuklie said in a statement. "Of course, we sincerely hope that this global health crisis ends soon and the economy rebounds, and we will continue to monitor and adjust the program as necessary."
Last year, as the financial markets continued to rally to new highs, Orrick reported stellar financial growth. Firm revenues grew by nearly 11% in the fiscal year 2019, from $1.05 billion to $1.16 billion and profits per equity partner (PEP) jumped 14%, from $1.99 million to $2.27 million, breaking the $2 million mark for the first time in firm history.
Zuklie attributed the stellar financial year to the firm's large institutional clients, including Microsoft, Oracle, Johnson & Johnson and Ocwen, which entrusted the firm with more matters.
He also praised the firm's technology and finance teams, which helped clients raise a collective $19 billion in venture capital financing in 2019, up 24% year over year, and guided several companies in their initial public offerings, including Beyond Meat's $240.6 million offering last year.
Read More
Pay Cuts, Layoffs, and More: How Law Firms Are Managing the Pandemic
Bryan Cave Cuts Pay for Partners and Employees, Taking 'Prudent Measures'
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDechert 'Spark Tank' Competition Encourages Firmwide Innovation Focus
Akerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Read the Document: 'Google Must Divest Chrome,' DOJ Says, Proposing Remedies in Search Monopoly Case
- 2Voir Dire Voyeur: I Find Out What Kind of Juror I’d Be
- 3When It Comes to Local Law 97 Compliance, You’ve Gotta Have (Good) Faith
- 4Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 5Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250