Firms Love LGBT Lawyers—Restrictions Apply
LGBT lawyers have made relatively big gains at large law firms, but their progress isn't reflected in the partnership ranks.
April 09, 2020 at 01:21 PM
4 minute read
|
Editor's note: This column appears in The American Lawyer's April print issue. Since it was written, the coronavirus pandemic has prompted Big Law layoffs and pay cuts. Those kinds of measures in the past have disproportionately affected women and minorities, including LGBT lawyers and staff.
Of all the groups that have faced discrimination in the legal profession, which one would you bet has gained the most traction? Well, I wouldn't put my money on women. Or lawyers of color. Here's the winner: LGBT lawyers.
"There's no social issue that's changed as fast as gay rights, especially for those in major cities who have graduate degrees—which pretty much describes lawyers in big firms," says Keith Wetmore, the former chairman of Morrison & Foerster who came out in 1982, one of the first lawyers to do so. Wetmore, now a recruiter for Major, Lindsey & Africa, says, "It's such a nonissue when partners move laterally. Firms just care about their book of business."
The pace of change stuns members of the LGBT community. "It was night and day," recalls Winston & Strawn partner Jennifer Golinveaux. "When I started practicing at a big Silicon Valley firm in 1999, I was advised not to come out for career reasons." That changed by the time she moved to Winston in 2004. Rather than a liability, being an LGBT lawyer can be a career-enhancer. "It's actually helpful with clients; it's included in the diversity metric," Golinveaux says.
Indeed, LGBT lawyers are on a roll. According to the National Association for Law Placement's 2019 diversity report, the number of LGBT lawyers in big firms continues to rise, representing 7% of all summer associates—a remarkable increase, considering that the overall figure for LGBT lawyers in 2002 was only 1%.
What's more, firms are vying for LGBT talent. In the Human Rights Campaign's latest Corporate Equality Index, an impressive 130 out of 164 firms got perfect scores for being gay-friendly. (In 2015, it was only 87 firms.)
Law firms love them. Clients love them. So why shouldn't we assume that the story of LGBT lawyers is one of unabashed success?
Here's the flip side: That progress isn't reflected in the partnership ranks. A new study by Diversity Lab and ChIPs, a women in technology and law organization, found that LGBT attorneys fared worst than women or racial minorities, with just 8% of firms hitting the 5% threshold for LGBT partner representation. (The study looked at 59 Am Law 200 firms and 14 other firms.)
"While there are increasing numbers of LGBTQ members in the associate ranks, they're not making it into the senior ranks," says D'Arcy Kemnitz, executive director at the National LGBT Bar Association.
So is the success of the LGBT community a mirage? Do LGBT members face bias as insidious or even worse than that faced by women and other minorities?
Not exactly. "Underrepresentation is not the same as discrimination," says Wetmore, adding that there might be LGBT partners who are not self-identifying as such. "There's still homophobia," he says, but, he adds, "I'm not sure it's more rampant than other types of discrimination."
"Sometimes numbers are misleading," says David Flugman, a partner at New York's Selendy & Gay, echoing Wetmore's point. A former partner at Kirkland & Ellis, Flugman says he's been open about his sexuality since college: "There's a generational divide. I'm 38, I grew up with DOMA, and I saw my LGBT identity as a value proposition."
The LGBT community has arguably gained acceptance in Big Law in ways that women and minorities have not. Unlike women, LGBT lawyers' ambition and commitment aren't called into question. And unlike racial minorities, they're not saddled with crippling stereotypes about their abilities or leadership qualities.
Which brings up what's often ignored: The LGBT community is a diverse ecosystem, and some members still face daunting challenges.
"People shouldn't judge the progress of the LGBT community based on the success of LGBT white men," Flugman cautions. "There are vastly different experiences among the LGBT community."
There's another part of the LGBT equation that's seldom discussed: the transgender community. Many gays and lesbians struggle to understand transgender individuals, Wetmore says, "which is ironic, given that we should know what it's like to be marginalized."
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Big Law Walks a Tightrope, Herbert Smith Freehills Refuses to Lose Its Footing
8 minute readHoly Grail: Can Changing Big Law Recruiting, Hiring and Training Lead to Greater Retention?
10 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250