Without Leverage, Private Equity Firms Missing Out on Stimulus Funds
Portfolio companies have thus far been excluded from the CARES Act and the Paycheck Protection Program, leaving private equity firms to lobby for a life raft.
April 13, 2020 at 06:21 PM
7 minute read
Concerted and aggressive lobbying efforts by those supporting the buyout industry have been met with opposition as private equity firms look for ways to prop up their portfolio companies during the COVID-19 pandemic.
While the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Stimulus (CARES) Act passed by Congress last month allocates more than $1 trillion in funding for small businesses, local and state governments and some large businesses, a provision within it is preventing some private equity firms from accessing the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) for small businesses that they have turned to in search of support.
The PPP fund, administered by the Small Business Administration (SBA) and with $350 billion in its coffers, is available to businesses with under 500 employees. But private equity portfolio companies are being grouped together as the sum of the portfolio's parts. While many have less than 500 employees, when lumped together they typically reach past that mark and are unable to petition for funds.
The industry has been lobbying to fix that, and had hoped that additional funding, being negotiated now by Republican and Democratic senators, would include its members. While the additional $250 billion likely to be added to the existing $350 billion PPP fund could be a savior for many small businesses, those owned by private equity firms are likely to be left out again, as neither the GOP nor Democratic legislation suggests any changes that would loop in the portfolio companies.
As of April 10, private equity firms are hoping that the newly enacted Main Street Lending program, which is designed to help midsize businesses under 10,000 employees, will provide some support.
Brian Richards, the Chicago-based partner and chairman of the global private equity practice at Paul Hastings, said he understands why portfolio companies didn't get funding this time around, but that doesn't change the fact that some of these businesses, without assistance, will go under because of coronavirus-related economic factors.
"It may just be a capacity issue," Richards said. "They need another $250 billion for those that do qualify already. If they expand the eligibility pool at all, there would be a further crush of demand that would exceed supply."
There have been some examples, however, of private equity-backed companies receiving some aid.
For example, the hospitality and travel industry, which has been decimated by COVID-19-related events, was granted an exception in the existing legislation that allows for larger entities to petition for funds normally reserved for small businesses. Travel and hospitality companies owned by private equity firms are allowed to request funding under that specific provision.
But many leading the lobbying effort for more inclusion believe that access will not be coming, in part because of the way they feel the private equity industry has been portrayed recently by Democrats.
According to Private Equity Insights, a networking platform founded in 2011, Democrats have ramped up rhetoric against the industry, citing examples of businesses run into the ground, as well as some industry leaders' support of President Donald Trump, whose administration has helped the industry via deregulation and tax cuts. Democrats have argued that this assistance widens income inequality and gives handouts to many of Trump's businesses, making them unlikely to support legislation that would extend a hand to the industry.
Richards said the GOP tends to favor traditional leveraged buyout firms, while venture or early stage companies enjoy support from both sides of the aisle. Either way, he said, there isn't a whole lot of logic in leaving out portfolio companies when it comes to assistance.
"It is a fundamental misunderstanding of how portfolio companies work," Richards said. "They have their own payroll, their own capital and management. I'm not sure that is understood in Washington, or that they care. It isn't politically popular to support them."
He said an example would be a small, family-run business of 400 employees that was purchased by a private equity firm in February. That same company would have been eligible for funds if this crisis would have occurred in January, but not now.
"The government has made a choice to allow those people to be furloughed," Richards said. "They could have protected those jobs just like they did for the nonprivate equity businesses. They think they are thinning out private equity, but they are just causing more unemployment."
The Washington Post reported that while lobbyists for the buyout industry have been requesting funds, officials at the SBA have told them they should use their own stockpiles to rescue their investments. The lobbying groups have hit back at the SBA, with several penning a letter to SBA Administrator Jovita Carranza saying the current path puts a "direct regulatory barrier to job retention and creation at some of the most innovative and exciting companies in our economy." They accused the SBA of punishing investors for "political purposes."
The industry is hoping to take another stab at securing PPP and CARES funds after April 20, when Congress will reevaluate the current bailout funding, the Post reported.
Slowed, Not Stopped
Unlike M&A results for Q1 of 2020, private equity work was up slightly in comparison to 2019. PE saw 1,384 deals closed in Q1 for a combined $186.4 billion, an increase of 7.3% in deal count and 6% in value year-over-year, according to PitchBook.
But virtually all of that was before the COVID-19 outbreak. Numbers for March were down significantly and PitchBook predicts that deal activity in the coming fiscal quarters will likely reach levels not seen since the Great Recession.
Even if funds are not secured from the bailout packages, there is still room for private equity work during COVID-19. For the first time in several years, company valuations have dipped significantly and those entities are looking for a cash influx. Both circumstances play well with PE firms' desire to find business opportunities below market rate.
Private equity firms Silver Lake Fund and Sixth Street Partners, for example, agreed to finance a $1 billion loan to Airbnb last Monday, although the funds demanded a 10% interest rate on the funding, to which Airbnb agreed. The company also agreed to significant changes in its leadership structure and fixed cost expenses, according to The Wall Street Journal.
While straight buyouts may be down due to the difficulty in securing loans, opportunities still exist for firms looking to invest in strong companies that have been hit harder than most by COVID-19 measures.
"There are some companies that won't make it," Richards said. "For others, this will affect the returns and the calculus as to whether private equity firms are willing to support their companies with more equity that would give them a chance to fight another day."
Read More:
As US Unemployment Soars, Legal Industry Hopes to Avoid Widespread Layoffs
As Remote Work Brings Isolation, How Can Firms Keep Lawyers in the Fold?
How Big Law Shaped Private Equity and Rode the Wave to Record Revenue
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
3 minute readKirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
5 minute readGoodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trump Signs Executive Order Creating Strategic Bitcoin Reserve
- 2St. Jude Labs Sued for $14.3M for Allegedly Falling Short of Purchase Expectations
- 3'Ridiculously Busy': Several Law Firms Position Themselves as Go-To Experts on Trump’s Executive Orders
- 4States Reach New $7.4B Opioid Deal With Purdue After SCOTUS Ruling
- 5$975,000 Settlement Reached After Fall on Sidewalk
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250