Without Leverage, Private Equity Firms Missing Out on Stimulus Funds
Portfolio companies have thus far been excluded from the CARES Act and the Paycheck Protection Program, leaving private equity firms to lobby for a life raft.
April 13, 2020 at 06:21 PM
7 minute read
Concerted and aggressive lobbying efforts by those supporting the buyout industry have been met with opposition as private equity firms look for ways to prop up their portfolio companies during the COVID-19 pandemic.
While the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Stimulus (CARES) Act passed by Congress last month allocates more than $1 trillion in funding for small businesses, local and state governments and some large businesses, a provision within it is preventing some private equity firms from accessing the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) for small businesses that they have turned to in search of support.
The PPP fund, administered by the Small Business Administration (SBA) and with $350 billion in its coffers, is available to businesses with under 500 employees. But private equity portfolio companies are being grouped together as the sum of the portfolio's parts. While many have less than 500 employees, when lumped together they typically reach past that mark and are unable to petition for funds.
The industry has been lobbying to fix that, and had hoped that additional funding, being negotiated now by Republican and Democratic senators, would include its members. While the additional $250 billion likely to be added to the existing $350 billion PPP fund could be a savior for many small businesses, those owned by private equity firms are likely to be left out again, as neither the GOP nor Democratic legislation suggests any changes that would loop in the portfolio companies.
As of April 10, private equity firms are hoping that the newly enacted Main Street Lending program, which is designed to help midsize businesses under 10,000 employees, will provide some support.
Brian Richards, the Chicago-based partner and chairman of the global private equity practice at Paul Hastings, said he understands why portfolio companies didn't get funding this time around, but that doesn't change the fact that some of these businesses, without assistance, will go under because of coronavirus-related economic factors.
"It may just be a capacity issue," Richards said. "They need another $250 billion for those that do qualify already. If they expand the eligibility pool at all, there would be a further crush of demand that would exceed supply."
There have been some examples, however, of private equity-backed companies receiving some aid.
For example, the hospitality and travel industry, which has been decimated by COVID-19-related events, was granted an exception in the existing legislation that allows for larger entities to petition for funds normally reserved for small businesses. Travel and hospitality companies owned by private equity firms are allowed to request funding under that specific provision.
But many leading the lobbying effort for more inclusion believe that access will not be coming, in part because of the way they feel the private equity industry has been portrayed recently by Democrats.
According to Private Equity Insights, a networking platform founded in 2011, Democrats have ramped up rhetoric against the industry, citing examples of businesses run into the ground, as well as some industry leaders' support of President Donald Trump, whose administration has helped the industry via deregulation and tax cuts. Democrats have argued that this assistance widens income inequality and gives handouts to many of Trump's businesses, making them unlikely to support legislation that would extend a hand to the industry.
Richards said the GOP tends to favor traditional leveraged buyout firms, while venture or early stage companies enjoy support from both sides of the aisle. Either way, he said, there isn't a whole lot of logic in leaving out portfolio companies when it comes to assistance.
"It is a fundamental misunderstanding of how portfolio companies work," Richards said. "They have their own payroll, their own capital and management. I'm not sure that is understood in Washington, or that they care. It isn't politically popular to support them."
He said an example would be a small, family-run business of 400 employees that was purchased by a private equity firm in February. That same company would have been eligible for funds if this crisis would have occurred in January, but not now.
"The government has made a choice to allow those people to be furloughed," Richards said. "They could have protected those jobs just like they did for the nonprivate equity businesses. They think they are thinning out private equity, but they are just causing more unemployment."
The Washington Post reported that while lobbyists for the buyout industry have been requesting funds, officials at the SBA have told them they should use their own stockpiles to rescue their investments. The lobbying groups have hit back at the SBA, with several penning a letter to SBA Administrator Jovita Carranza saying the current path puts a "direct regulatory barrier to job retention and creation at some of the most innovative and exciting companies in our economy." They accused the SBA of punishing investors for "political purposes."
The industry is hoping to take another stab at securing PPP and CARES funds after April 20, when Congress will reevaluate the current bailout funding, the Post reported.
|Slowed, Not Stopped
Unlike M&A results for Q1 of 2020, private equity work was up slightly in comparison to 2019. PE saw 1,384 deals closed in Q1 for a combined $186.4 billion, an increase of 7.3% in deal count and 6% in value year-over-year, according to PitchBook.
But virtually all of that was before the COVID-19 outbreak. Numbers for March were down significantly and PitchBook predicts that deal activity in the coming fiscal quarters will likely reach levels not seen since the Great Recession.
Even if funds are not secured from the bailout packages, there is still room for private equity work during COVID-19. For the first time in several years, company valuations have dipped significantly and those entities are looking for a cash influx. Both circumstances play well with PE firms' desire to find business opportunities below market rate.
Private equity firms Silver Lake Fund and Sixth Street Partners, for example, agreed to finance a $1 billion loan to Airbnb last Monday, although the funds demanded a 10% interest rate on the funding, to which Airbnb agreed. The company also agreed to significant changes in its leadership structure and fixed cost expenses, according to The Wall Street Journal.
While straight buyouts may be down due to the difficulty in securing loans, opportunities still exist for firms looking to invest in strong companies that have been hit harder than most by COVID-19 measures.
"There are some companies that won't make it," Richards said. "For others, this will affect the returns and the calculus as to whether private equity firms are willing to support their companies with more equity that would give them a chance to fight another day."
|Read More:
As US Unemployment Soars, Legal Industry Hopes to Avoid Widespread Layoffs
As Remote Work Brings Isolation, How Can Firms Keep Lawyers in the Fold?
How Big Law Shaped Private Equity and Rode the Wave to Record Revenue
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250