'The Idea Is Not to Do This Twice': Mintz Leader on the Fight to Avoid Furloughs, Layoffs
Managing partner Bob Bodian said lawyers and staff are enduring pay cuts to avoid even worse alternatives.
April 14, 2020 at 06:23 PM
4 minute read
Boston-founded Am Law 100 firm Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, like most other major law firms, has been forced to make difficult decisions about how to manage the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic.
With solid finances, a fiscal year that ends later than most and an ethos of solidarity, Mintz managing partner Robert Bodian said the firm has been able to make necessary cuts without resorting to job losses. And the idea is to keep it that way.
"Just keeping all our people here was important to us, and from a socially conscious perspective it seemed like the right thing to do," he said.
Bodian, in an email to the firm on April 10, announced reductions in staff and paraprofessional salaries by 5% across the board, except for those making under $75,000. He said the firm would also be reducing associate salaries by 10%.
Discretionary bonus payouts have been reduced by 50% for staff and taken off the table for associates. Equity partner holdbacks (profits that will be kept by the firm and not dispersed to shareholders) will now be 40%, increased from the firm's traditional 30% hold, and monthly payouts to equity partners will be reduced by 10%, with nonequity partners payouts reduced by 5%.
Bodian said even though the firm was able to prepay $10 million in expenses for 2020 and slashed department budgets to preserve jobs, it was clear that some compensation sacrifice was going to have to be made.
The timing of the firm's fiscal year-end turned out to be a blessing. Mintz has a fiscal year that ends in late March, so while many firms prepared their 2020 fiscal budgets before COVID-19 wreaked havoc on the global economy, Mintz had a chance to see what was coming and plan accordingly.
Bodian said Mintz, which according to ALM data has seen firm revenues increase by 46% over the previous five years, found both partners and associates willing to absorb short-term cuts to protect the firm.
"No one likes having their compensation cut, but the partners were very team- and firm-oriented and wanted to do something that works out all the way around," Bodian said. "There was no pressure on me to maximize partner equity. There was more pressure to make sure people are treated fairly than to maximize compensation."
"The feedback from the partners was basically that they are proud to be at a firm like this," he added.
As for the associates, he said, "it was the widely held belief that the associates would rather take a relatively digestible pay cut as opposed to having colleagues terminated."
Bodian said he hoped the budget moves would be enough to carry the firm through the crisis.
"The idea is not to do this twice. We really did try to be as reasonable and gentle as we can be with this thing," Bodian said. "Hopefully, there will come a time when the world gets back to normal," he added, "and we can restore budgets to precut conditions."
Even then, there could be some lasting changes to the industry, he suggested.
With virtually all major law firms working remotely, for example, the costs associated with office space are being scrutinized more than ever.
"That is something that I think is going to change," Bodian said of how firm's view their physical footprint. "The legal industry in this country has been behind the trend in flexible office space arrangements. Things like hoteling are common in Europe and with the accounting firms and other industries that are not common in law firms. We are looking at that more closely."
But the biggest change, Bodian said, could be to the amount of work done outside the office.
"I believe more remote working will end up being a permanent thing to some extent," he said.
|Read More
After a Record Year, Venable Cuts Pay, Furloughs Some Staff to 'Prudently Prepare'
Sheppard Mullin Furloughs 33 Staff Members
Boston Firms Make Cuts, Program Changes as COVID-19 Continues to Rattle Industry
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250