Crowell Cuts Pay, Citing COVID-19 Projections, Aiming to Avoid Layoffs
Philip Inglima, the firm's chair, said equity partners will take a temporary 25% compensation cut, nonequity partners will take a 20% cut, and associates and counsel will take a 15% cut and staff making more than $100,000 will also have their pay reduced.
April 15, 2020 at 01:35 PM
3 minute read
Crowell & Moring, an Am Law 100 firm known for its major government contracts practice, said Wednesday it will cut pay for lawyers and some professional staff by 5% to 25% in response to the coronavirus pandemic and its impact on the economy.
Philip Inglima, the firm's chair, said equity partners will take a 25% compensation cut, income partners will take a 20% cut, and associates and counsel will take a 15% cut. Staff making more than $100,000—about a third of the firm's staff—also will have their pay reduced 5% to 20%, he said. He said the reductions were temporary and the firm expects to lift them by the end of the year, depending on the impact of the pandemic.
Inglima added that because partners benefit most when times are good, they are "shouldering the main burdens of our response." He said the firm was fortunate that clients had turned to it for help in the crisis, with some proving to be "fairly resistant" to its effects.
"We have avoided any approach that would include layoffs," he said, noting that the firm has also cut back on expenses and planned capital outlays. "Instead, we are focused on trying to ensure that we have reductions in the real-time cost of our talent over the next several months."
Inglima said the firm has been supporting clients working on the coronavirus response, including major industrial clients that are working on ventilators and other medical supplies hospitals need. Many coronavirus patients who are hospitalized have been put on ventilators, raising fears of a shortage of the devices and of the drugs required to keep the critically ill patients using them safe and sedated.
In terms of law firm business, Inglima said, Crowell anticipates that its recovery cases, many of which are done on contingency, will still do well this year. But, he cautioned, it is impossible for any firm to say it was "insulated" from the pandemic's impact, noting, for example, that "our clients' timeliness of payment and ability to continue sending us work through the balance of the year are going to be affected by it."
"We did see some of the impact of the coronavirus pandemic on our clients and on our revenue in March, but fairly modest," he said. "It's much more an expectation of what it will do for the balance of the year."
News of the compensation cuts comes shortly after the firm announced it was expanding in San Francisco with the hire of several partners and other lawyers from Atrium, the legal startup that closed its doors earlier this year. Inglima said the firm already had some visibility into the impact of the pandemic when the hires were made, and said it would continue to make hires "on a very selective basis."
Read More
Pay Cuts, Layoffs, and More: How Law Firms Are Managing the Pandemic
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGreenberg Traurig Litigation Co-Chair Returning After Three Years as US Attorney
3 minute readBlank Rome Snags Two Labor and Employment Partners From Stevens & Lee
4 minute read12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readAfter Breakaway From FisherBroyles, Pierson Ferdinand Bills $75M in First Year
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 2CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 3Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 4Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250