Schiff Hardin Attorneys, Staff Hit With Salary Cuts Up to 50%
Most lawyers and staffers who make more than $100,000 will see their salaries temporarily reduced by 15%, but pay for a small portion of lawyers could be slashed in half.
April 16, 2020 at 12:35 PM
3 minute read
Schiff Hardin on Thursday announced it is cutting salaries for both attorneys and staff, including reductions of up to 50% in compensation that will affect about 6% of the Chicago-based firm's attorneys.
Most of Schiff Hardin's lawyers and staffers who make more than $100,000 will see their salaries temporarily cut by 15%. The firm is also laying off a small number of staff—in 2019, Schiff employed 227 staffers across seven offices, according to ALM data.
In a statement, the firm said that the potential 50% pay cuts for some lawyers would be based on "anticipated demand."
"These are challenging times for our attorneys and staff and we are asking everyone in the firm to make sacrifices and share the burden," Schiff Hardin said in a statement. "We believe this is the right approach for our firm and will allow us to continue to provide quality service to our clients and ensure the strength of the law firm going forward as we weather this health and economic crisis."
The firm said it also canceled its summer program but has extended job offers to its five summer associates. Its also pushing back the start date of its first-year class to January 2021 at least.
The economic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic are hitting Schiff Hardin after the firm saw its overall revenue and head count drop again in 2019 for the fourth year in a row, according to preliminary reporting for The American Lawyer's Am Law 100 rankings.
Schiff Hardin saw its revenue drop by 3.3% in 2019 to $186 million and a 3.2% decline in overall head count, to 233 lawyers. In an interview conducted March 13, managing partner Marci Eisenstein said the firm "feels very good about last year." She pointed to the firm's revenue per lawyer and profits per partner, both of which stayed relatively flat at $800,000 and $1.01 million, respectively, as positive news.
"We feel we're punching above our weight relative to our peer firms," Eisenstein said at the time.
Schiff Hardin's revenue and head count declines occurred when the economy was considered strong. Asked about how the firm might perform in an economic downturn or a recession triggered by the pandemic, Eisenstein indicated she hoped for the best while noting that clients need help.
"I am very hopeful that the social distancing decisions that are being made by our government and business is going to help nip this thing in the bud," Eisenstein said at the time. "I think our clients have profound needs right now. They're looking to firms and lawyers to support them. They're in their kitchens, too, feeling disconnected. … There are real opportunities to distinguish ourselves in supporting our clients through this."
In sending out its statement Thursday, the firm declined to elaborate further.
Read More
Pay Cuts, Layoffs, and More: How Law Firms Are Managing the Pandemic
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGreenberg Traurig Litigation Co-Chair Returning After Three Years as US Attorney
3 minute readBlank Rome Snags Two Labor and Employment Partners From Stevens & Lee
4 minute read12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readAfter Breakaway From FisherBroyles, Pierson Ferdinand Bills $75M in First Year
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 2CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 3Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 4Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250