From the Editor: What the 2019 Numbers Tell Us About Managing Through 2020
For firms with cash on hand, the coming months will be much more manageable, Gina Passarella writes in the editor's note from the 2020 Am Law 100 report.
April 21, 2020 at 09:47 AM
4 minute read
The close of the 2019 fiscal year probably feels like decades ago, but the efforts made in the last quarter of last year and the first quarter of 2020 will play a big part in how firms weather this downturn.
The growth across the Am Law 100 was strong, but slower than the prior two years, showing the economy was starting to feel some signs of a slowdown. Rate increases of more than 3% drove much of the growth and more than 80% of firms said they planned to increase rates by more than 3% in 2020—a plan tossed out the window now as firms hope to realize even half of their normal collections over the next few months.
But if firms have cash on hand or readily accessible, the coming months will be more manageable.
In most cases, firm leaders reported a very strong March, both in terms of demand and collections, saying they came in ahead of March 2019. There was some evidence of softness in the last two weeks of the month, mainly on the collections side, but not enough to miss budget by any material amount, if at all. While the early days of April were also good from a demand perspective, firms are preparing for a rough rest of the second quarter, modeling as much as 50% down on collections. That is driving many of the cash-preserving measures firms are taking.
All predictions for just how far the industry will see revenue drop in 2020 are just that—predictions. No one knows. But the ranges we consistently hear are between flat and 30% down for the year, with somewhere in the middle being most consistent.
Banks and firm leaders say firms are much better capitalized coming into this downturn than they were in the Great Recession. They are also better run, with more seasoned business executives in the C-suite. Last year ended on a very strong Q4 and inventory was heavy coming into 2020. Given the timing of when the crisis hit, many firms were able to delay 2019 distributions normally paid out in Q1 and are using that as a cushion for when collections slow. Some firms paid out April partner draws (but warned it could be the last for a while), while others held them back.
Law firms say they are busier than ever in many respects, with clients seeking counseling across a number of novel areas. But turning that into paid work, or longer-term engagements that would rack up hours, is proving difficult. Even if it is billable work, most firms seem resigned to the fact that lawyers will not be at the top of the list for clients to pay in the months ahead. This is the time to invest in your client relationships, and firms have to have the access to cash that will allow for that investment of unpaid time.
The numbers we write about in these pages a year from now will be determined by a variety of factors, including the length of the downturn, culture, practice mix and a firm's philosophy on debt and cash conservation leading into this crisis. These won't be easy months, and leadership and communication are needed now more than ever. But it's also a time to look for opportunity. Opportunity to do things differently. Opportunity to differentiate. Opportunity to move your position, not just in these rankings, but in the eyes of clients and talent. Be well.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllJudge Approves Orrick's $8M Data Breach Settlement While Gunster Agrees to $8.5M
'Sharp and Profound' Policy Shifts Prompt DC Law Firms to Evaluate Opportunities, Challenges
5 minute readBaker McKenzie, Greenberg Traurig, Clyde & Co. Expand In Middle East
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 2Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 3Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 4Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.