From the Editor: What the 2019 Numbers Tell Us About Managing Through 2020
For firms with cash on hand, the coming months will be much more manageable, Gina Passarella writes in the editor's note from the 2020 Am Law 100 report.
April 21, 2020 at 09:47 AM
4 minute read
The close of the 2019 fiscal year probably feels like decades ago, but the efforts made in the last quarter of last year and the first quarter of 2020 will play a big part in how firms weather this downturn.
The growth across the Am Law 100 was strong, but slower than the prior two years, showing the economy was starting to feel some signs of a slowdown. Rate increases of more than 3% drove much of the growth and more than 80% of firms said they planned to increase rates by more than 3% in 2020—a plan tossed out the window now as firms hope to realize even half of their normal collections over the next few months.
But if firms have cash on hand or readily accessible, the coming months will be more manageable.
In most cases, firm leaders reported a very strong March, both in terms of demand and collections, saying they came in ahead of March 2019. There was some evidence of softness in the last two weeks of the month, mainly on the collections side, but not enough to miss budget by any material amount, if at all. While the early days of April were also good from a demand perspective, firms are preparing for a rough rest of the second quarter, modeling as much as 50% down on collections. That is driving many of the cash-preserving measures firms are taking.
All predictions for just how far the industry will see revenue drop in 2020 are just that—predictions. No one knows. But the ranges we consistently hear are between flat and 30% down for the year, with somewhere in the middle being most consistent.
Banks and firm leaders say firms are much better capitalized coming into this downturn than they were in the Great Recession. They are also better run, with more seasoned business executives in the C-suite. Last year ended on a very strong Q4 and inventory was heavy coming into 2020. Given the timing of when the crisis hit, many firms were able to delay 2019 distributions normally paid out in Q1 and are using that as a cushion for when collections slow. Some firms paid out April partner draws (but warned it could be the last for a while), while others held them back.
Law firms say they are busier than ever in many respects, with clients seeking counseling across a number of novel areas. But turning that into paid work, or longer-term engagements that would rack up hours, is proving difficult. Even if it is billable work, most firms seem resigned to the fact that lawyers will not be at the top of the list for clients to pay in the months ahead. This is the time to invest in your client relationships, and firms have to have the access to cash that will allow for that investment of unpaid time.
The numbers we write about in these pages a year from now will be determined by a variety of factors, including the length of the downturn, culture, practice mix and a firm's philosophy on debt and cash conservation leading into this crisis. These won't be easy months, and leadership and communication are needed now more than ever. But it's also a time to look for opportunity. Opportunity to do things differently. Opportunity to differentiate. Opportunity to move your position, not just in these rankings, but in the eyes of clients and talent. Be well.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Ridiculously Busy': Several Law Firms Position Themselves as Go-To Experts on Trump’s Executive Orders
5 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readAm Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
3 minute readPaul Hastings Hires Music Industry Practice Chair From Willkie in Los Angeles
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250