After Declines, Burford CEO Points to Busy 2020, Cites COVID-19 Claims Ahead
Investors in the litigation funding giant also appeared hopeful for future gains despite a big dip in 2019.
April 28, 2020 at 02:48 PM
4 minute read
Burford Capital CEO Christopher Bogart on Tuesday sought to minimize the significance of the litigation funder's newly disclosed double-digit dip in revenue and profits for 2019. Instead, he highlighted a third straight year in which the company deployed over $1 billion to back new claims, as well as a busy start to 2020 for cases in the pipeline and investment opportunities from the coronavirus crisis.
The litigation finance giant's fiscal report for 2019 showed operating profits tumbled by 21% and total income dropped by 15%. But Bogart stressed that waiting on the courts—an inherent part of the litigation funding model—necessarily led to unpredictable timing on results.
"I used to run a cable TV business. We knew by the beginning of the year how much money we were going to make at the end of the year," he said. "The way we look at this business is on a cash basis as opposed to an accounting statement business."
That means a focus on continuing to commit and deploy significant amounts of capital to promising matters.
Bogart flagged over $1.6 billion in new commitments by the funder, along with $1 billion deployed over the year, increasing the size of Burford's portfolio to $4.2 billion.
"You sit and then you wait," he said of the business model. "But the ratio of wins and losses is pretty consistent."
Bogart added that the outcomes thus far in 2020 have been particularly satisfying, with court results and arbitration decisions that would yield $800 million in cash, if paid in full.
"Given that we did $1 billion in 2019, we're well ahead of last year's rate," he said.
While acknowledging the company had also deployed at least $1 billion in the last three years, Bogart wouldn't commit to matching that figure again in 2020.
"It all depends on the pace of individual cases, but it's looking like a busy year," he said.
Well before the coronavirus crisis torpedoed economic growth in the U.S. and globally, leaders at Burford and throughout the litigation finance industry had contended that there would be a surge in demand for outside capital in the next recession. Now that it has arrived, the company is fielding more inquiries.
"The world's not seeing huge volume of COVID-19 litigation yet," Bogart said. "What's happening instead is that people who have existing litigation that has nothing to do with COVID-19 but are concerned about liquidity are reaching out."
While some businesses are simply looking to offload the cost of legal fees, others are eager to monetize claims and receive capital based on the expected value of the outcome. Burford says it recently worked with a Fortune 100 company in one such monetization for $75 million.
The expected flood of COVID-19 related claims won't likely arrive until after businesses can quantify their damages, although some insurance coverage lawsuits and fights over force majeure provisions in contracts where the window for performance has passed are already moving forward.
Bogart also said that the August 2019 short-selling attack on the company's stock by investment firm Muddy Waters Research has had little impact on the firm's operations, adding the consequences were primarily on Burford's investors.
"That damage is slowly being rehabilitated," he said.
Burford's stock, which is traded on London's AIM exchange for smaller growth companies, lost roughly half of its value after Muddy Waters released its report calling the company "arguably already insolvent."
The stock price slid throughout February after Burford warned in the beginning of the month that 2019 profits were likely to be lower than the previous year. But value increased by 16.5% from Monday's close on the basis of the company's report, closing trading Tuesday at £474.2.
|Read More
Burford Slapped With Class Action Securities Suit After Muddy Waters Dustup
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFreshfields, Paul Hastings, McDermott, Alston Hire in Core Practices, Amid Flurry of Q4 Lateral Moves
5 minute readLatham, Kirkland Alums Land the Top GC Posts—Here's What It Means for Business Generation
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250