After Declines, Burford CEO Points to Busy 2020, Cites COVID-19 Claims Ahead
Investors in the litigation funding giant also appeared hopeful for future gains despite a big dip in 2019.
April 28, 2020 at 02:48 PM
4 minute read
Burford Capital CEO Christopher Bogart on Tuesday sought to minimize the significance of the litigation funder's newly disclosed double-digit dip in revenue and profits for 2019. Instead, he highlighted a third straight year in which the company deployed over $1 billion to back new claims, as well as a busy start to 2020 for cases in the pipeline and investment opportunities from the coronavirus crisis.
The litigation finance giant's fiscal report for 2019 showed operating profits tumbled by 21% and total income dropped by 15%. But Bogart stressed that waiting on the courts—an inherent part of the litigation funding model—necessarily led to unpredictable timing on results.
"I used to run a cable TV business. We knew by the beginning of the year how much money we were going to make at the end of the year," he said. "The way we look at this business is on a cash basis as opposed to an accounting statement business."
That means a focus on continuing to commit and deploy significant amounts of capital to promising matters.
Bogart flagged over $1.6 billion in new commitments by the funder, along with $1 billion deployed over the year, increasing the size of Burford's portfolio to $4.2 billion.
"You sit and then you wait," he said of the business model. "But the ratio of wins and losses is pretty consistent."
Bogart added that the outcomes thus far in 2020 have been particularly satisfying, with court results and arbitration decisions that would yield $800 million in cash, if paid in full.
"Given that we did $1 billion in 2019, we're well ahead of last year's rate," he said.
While acknowledging the company had also deployed at least $1 billion in the last three years, Bogart wouldn't commit to matching that figure again in 2020.
"It all depends on the pace of individual cases, but it's looking like a busy year," he said.
Well before the coronavirus crisis torpedoed economic growth in the U.S. and globally, leaders at Burford and throughout the litigation finance industry had contended that there would be a surge in demand for outside capital in the next recession. Now that it has arrived, the company is fielding more inquiries.
"The world's not seeing huge volume of COVID-19 litigation yet," Bogart said. "What's happening instead is that people who have existing litigation that has nothing to do with COVID-19 but are concerned about liquidity are reaching out."
While some businesses are simply looking to offload the cost of legal fees, others are eager to monetize claims and receive capital based on the expected value of the outcome. Burford says it recently worked with a Fortune 100 company in one such monetization for $75 million.
The expected flood of COVID-19 related claims won't likely arrive until after businesses can quantify their damages, although some insurance coverage lawsuits and fights over force majeure provisions in contracts where the window for performance has passed are already moving forward.
Bogart also said that the August 2019 short-selling attack on the company's stock by investment firm Muddy Waters Research has had little impact on the firm's operations, adding the consequences were primarily on Burford's investors.
"That damage is slowly being rehabilitated," he said.
Burford's stock, which is traded on London's AIM exchange for smaller growth companies, lost roughly half of its value after Muddy Waters released its report calling the company "arguably already insolvent."
The stock price slid throughout February after Burford warned in the beginning of the month that 2019 profits were likely to be lower than the previous year. But value increased by 16.5% from Monday's close on the basis of the company's report, closing trading Tuesday at £474.2.
Read More
Burford Slapped With Class Action Securities Suit After Muddy Waters Dustup
'Revenge Porn' Probe, New Investment Report Keep Burford in the Spotlight
Burford Touts Management Moves, Potential NY Listing and End to Investor Class Action
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPaul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
3 minute readKirkland Is Entering a New Market. Will Its Rates Get a Warm Welcome?
5 minute readGoodwin Procter Relocates to Renewable-Powered Office in San Francisco’s Financial District
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250