Katten Pairs Pay Cuts, Furloughs With Assistance Fund for Idled Employees
While implementing familiar cost-cutting measures, Katten Muchin Rosenman is also joining a smaller group of firms working to augment governmental assistance for affected workers.
April 29, 2020 at 06:00 PM
4 minute read
Katten Muchin Rosenman announced its first major austerity measures Wednesday, implementing furloughs and pay cuts but steering clear of layoffs.
The Chicago-founded Am Law 100 firm also said it had launched a new internal fund to supplement the governmental assistance available for its affected workers.
"Given the continuing public health and economic crises, we, like many, had to take a careful look at everything and make tough but necessary decisions in order to maintain the strength of our firm," Katten chairman Roger Furey said in a statement. "We are mindful of the enormous challenges that individuals and families are facing. Doing our best to take care of our people through these trying times is a priority."
The firm said it is cutting salaries by up to 20% for attorneys and business professionals who make over $100,000 a year, though no one affected will see their pay reduced to below $100,000.
Those making less than $100,000 in annual salary will see no reductions, the firm said.
The firm also said it would furlough some employees, including business professionals and a small number of staff attorneys, although it did not specify the total number of people affected. Those furloughed will still maintain medical, dental and vision benefits if they were enrolled in the firm's program, Katten said.
The furloughs go into effect May 1. Katten said it will reevaluate the steps it is taking on a monthly basis.
The firm also said that it is suspending monthly partner dividends, with no payouts coming to the equity partners for April and May, at which point the firm will reassess where it stands.
Katten's summer associate program, meanwhile, is still up in the air. The firm has been in touch with its summer associates, it said, but no final decisions have been made. For now, the firm said it is most likely looking at pushing the start date back to July, but didn't provide specifics.
Similar cost-cutting moves have been adopted by a wide range of Big Law firms, but Katten is also joining a smaller group of firms that are working to augment the financial assistance available to employees whose livelihoods are being undercut.
Katten said Wednesday that it has created a Supplemental Unemployment Benefits (SUB) Fund, designed to boost existing state and federal assistance programs and get employees back to, or at least closer to, their pre-furlough pay.
The firm said it expects the SUB fund to help lawyers and staff reach between 80% and 100% of their former pay levels.
Other firms have taken similar steps. Davis Wright Tremaine, for example, created an Employee Disaster Relief Program for its employees. The fund, paid for by the partners, is designed to help with household expenses for employees and offset "financial hardships caused by the pandemic," the firm said in an email.
The firm is also using a vacation time sharing scheme, allowing employees to "donate" their vacation time to someone else who may need it to deal with COVID-19-related difficulties such as the lack of child care options.
Paul Hastings created an "emergency fund" for staff and nonpartner attorneys affected by COVID-19 that will allow firm lawyers and staff to contribute, either for themselves or others, and the firm said it would match those contributions. Paul Hastings did something similar in 2017 for those affected by Hurricane Harvey, but without the matching funds.
Katten said it has been holding weekly roundtables for attorneys and staff to keep them up to date on any measures the firm is taking, inviting feedback on how it might navigate the cost cuts. The firm said it will meet monthly to discuss updates to Wednesday's announcement.
Katten, which saw a 5.5% growth in revenue year-over-year, also saw its profits per equity partner jump by over 10% year-over-year to more than $1.8 million.
This story has been updated to reflect that a small number of staff attorneys are among the Katten employees being furloughed under the firm's new measures.
|Read More
Katten Sees Revenue Climb Despite 'Sluggish' Start and Partner Exits
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250