State Bankruptcies May Still Be a Long Shot, but Big Law Is Ready
Law firm bankruptcy and restructuring practices are taking Mitch McConnell's controversial proposal seriously enough to plan ahead.
May 04, 2020 at 01:57 PM
6 minute read
It's no secret that major law firm bankruptcy practices are ramping up for a historic rise in Chapter 11 filings, workouts and other restructuring work as industries are battered by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Controversial comments by the Senate majority leader last month raised the possibility that restructuring lawyers could also gain a new clientele: state governments.
States can't file for bankruptcy under the current bankruptcy code. But after Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell said that some struggling states may have to consider a Chapter 9 filing instead of counting on a federal bailout—remarks that were rebuked as overtly partisan by lawmakers on both sides of the aisle—restructuring attorneys have nevertheless been gaming potential scenarios.
"[McConnell] made that statement tongue in cheek, basically to tell blue states to take a hike," said John Rapisardi, chair of O'Melveny & Myers' global restructuring practice. "But it is certainly possible, via the 10th Amendment, for a state to access bankruptcy if Congress was able to amend the bankruptcy code."
Rapisardi is the lead bankruptcy counsel to the government of Puerto Rico and has been tasked with reorganizing the territory's $70 billion in debt—a restructuring that has already generated more than $500 million in attorney fees. He said the territory's experience could provide a rough blueprint for states to reorganize their debt in bankruptcy court.
"In the Puerto Rico restructuring, we've learned a lot about the dynamics the impact Chapter 9 has on creditors' rights," he said. "We are gearing up for this issue and looking at various states struggling, particularly Illinois.
"In terms of deficits and underfunded pension liabilities, though PROMESA [the Puerto Rico Oversight, Management and Economic Stability Act] we have gained a lot of insight into how you might attack the problems states are running against," Raspiardi added. "With the coronavirus, the situation has only gotten worse, and the problem will not go away."
Even with the framework in Puerto Rico as a guide, much would have to change in the U.S. bankruptcy code before states could even attempt to seek such relief, as they are sovereign under the Constitution and cannot fully submit themselves to federal oversight.
Larry Larose, a partner in Sheppard Mullin's finance and bankruptcy practice group who focuses on municipal restructurings, pointed out that although Puerto Rico eventually found a path forward, the territory had to clear enormous hurdles—and there would be even more roadblocks for states.
"It's an interesting legal issue as to whether the federal government can craft statutes that permit states to declare bankruptcy that will pass constitutional muster," he said, adding that under the current standards, a municipality can only lodge a Chapter 9 petition if the state consents. Additionally, a federal judge overseeing a municipal bankruptcy has more restrictions than a bankruptcy judge assigned to a Chapter 11 case, he said.
"In terms of states filing for bankruptcy, all of those issues become magnified," he said. "A state would have to submit itself to federal jurisdiction, but who consents? The governor? The legislature? Or does it go to the people through a referendum?"
Those questions themselves may deliver work for law firms; as Larose explained, any conclusion the federal government may reach would almost certainly be litigated.
"There won't be a clear path," he said.
Peter Friedman, O'Melveny's bankruptcy litigation group leader, agreed that move to allow states to declare bankruptcy would likely be fought in court.
"Another barrier people don't usually talk about, is that states can't file for bankruptcy because if they do, in effect they are taking steps to violate the Contracts Clause, a provision of the Constitution that bars states from taking action to impair contracts," he said. "It's a complicated question that's ultimately addressed through extensive litigation, and it's not surprising to see the issue reviewed by the Supreme Court in a number of historical cases involving states and bankruptcy."
At O'Melveny, Rapisardi and Friedman said the firm is strategizing and researching the issues, planning out what things would look like so in the event this gained traction, the firm would be ready to assist clients that could be affected.
"Internally, we are writing position papers, analyzing how we could achieve this and looking at each states' situation because these are acute problems that need to be addressed," Rapisardi aid. "You'll see us in the coming months publish papers and positions in how we think our learning and experience with PROMESA can be used to develop a framework for a solution for these states because it's a problem that will not go away."
At Sheppard Mullins, Larose said that even if state bankruptcies never fully come to fruition, he expects to see increased municipal restructuring work at the local, city and agency level.
"Bankruptcy for states is probably not a silver bullet, but there could be bankruptcy-lite for some states," he said. "There's a federal statute that says states could commit part of themselves to federal jurisdictions and reorganize parts of themselves in federal court. These may be baby steps as opposed to putting a whole state through the process, but given what we've seen in the last two months, and anticipating what's coming, something needs to be done."
Even as restructuring lawyers chart the possibilities, Daniel Guyder, a partner in Allen & Overy's U.S. restructuring group, said it was important to consider not only if and how states could file for bankruptcy, but whether they should.
"It would create opportunities for law firms, and most people in those sectors would probably welcome this change because it is a new avenue for services and the opportunity to help clients. At Allen & Overy, we're constantly trying to anticipate the next opportunity to be cutting edge," he said. "But there's a practical another side of that: is this really the kind of thing we want to encourage of our states when there are other tools in their toolbox to manage challenges?"
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250