Hogan Lovells Cuts Attorney Comp After Delaying Partner Distributions
CEO Stephen Immelt said that while the firm's financial position is solid, "complacency is not an option."
May 06, 2020 at 05:01 PM
3 minute read
Hogan Lovells is cutting compensation for all U.S. attorneys earning over $100,000 annually, citing uncertainties in the pandemic environment and a slowdown on global economic activity.
The firm's latest announcement comes three weeks after the firm said it would spread partner distributions and bonuses initially scheduled for May over the coming months.
CEO Stephen Immelt said in a statement Wednesday that the compensation reductions, which hit equity partners most sharply, were necessary to protect the business amid a grim global economic outlook, even though the firm's overall position is solid.
"We continue to see an uptick of work in the technology and life sciences sectors, our restructuring practice is very active, and we have successfully advised on headline-grabbing M&A deals. However, we are facing an uncertain environment and economic activity globally continues to drag," Immelt said. "Complacency is not an option for us. We are therefore continuing with our policy of cutting back all non-essential costs and making measured adjustments to compensation."
The cuts, which go into effect on June 1, include reductions to equity partners' monthly draws by 15% to 25%. Equity partners will also defer half of any profits from the first quarter, ordinarily paid in August, to December.
Nonequity partners will see base compensation reduced by 15%, which would amount to an annual salary cut of 8.75% if the change stays in effect for the entire year.
Most nonpartner attorneys at the firm, including all associates, will receive a 10% salary cut, akin to 6% over the full year, while the most highly compensated counsel and specialists will face 15% cuts, as will all senior counsel. Attorneys currently earning less than $100,000 will be unaffected.
Decisions on U.S. attorney bonuses will be made in the normal course at the end of the year.
The firm's earlier financial response to the COVID-19 crisis involved spreading partner compensation payments based on 2019 performance equally over each month depending on the amount owed to each partner, rather than distributing them on May 1. The firm also deferred salary reviews and discretionary bonuses for lawyers in the U.K. and Asia Pacific regions, which were due to take place on May 1, along with reviews and bonuses for the significant majority of business service teams worldwide, which were also scheduled for the same date.
Associates in the Americas, Continental Europe and Africa have their reviews at the end of the year, so they are not currently directly affected by the delay in salary and bonus reviews.
But U.S. business service team members had salary reviews and bonus payments scheduled for the start of May, just as colleagues throughout the world, and the "significant majority" of these are also to be postponed and reassessed later in the year.
The measures come after a period of financial growth. Hogan Lovells grew total global revenue by 6% in 2019 while raising profits per equity partner by 9% to $1.51 million.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGreenberg Traurig Litigation Co-Chair Returning After Three Years as US Attorney
3 minute readBlank Rome Snags Two Labor and Employment Partners From Stevens & Lee
4 minute read12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readAfter Breakaway From FisherBroyles, Pierson Ferdinand Bills $75M in First Year
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 2CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 3Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 4Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250