Simpson Thacher Says Summer Associates Can Earn More Money Through Giving Back
While Simpson appears unique in offering a stipend in exchange for community service, other firms are also encouraging community service or pro bono work as part of their summer programs.
May 08, 2020 at 11:59 AM
4 minute read
More big firms are incorporating pro bono and community service elements into their summer programs, at a time of soaring unemployment and high stress on small businesses and nonprofits.
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett told summer associates Thursday that the firm's approach to their compensation would be structured around community service.
Like many others, Simpson Thacher will have a five-week virtual program, from July 13 through August 14. Their summer associates will get eight weeks of pay. But Simpson is also offering summers an additional $7,500 stipend for community service work, according to an email sent to summer associates Thursday.
"We are incorporating a focus on giving back into our 2020 summer associate program," the email said. "The combination of 8 weeks' salary and the $7,500 stipend will result in total compensation of slightly more than 10 weeks of summer associate pay, which is the average duration of our traditional summer program."
To be eligible for the stipend, the firm's email said, it expected summer associates to "volunteer your services for a set minimum amount of time" to a charitable, nonprofit or community service group of their choosing, or outreach program of their own design, by Sept. 1.
The firm said the services don't need to be legal in nature and could range from organizing food drives or safely helping the elderly with shopping, leading nonpartisan voter registration initiatives, continuing to help a client from a law school clinic, assisting a nonprofit or small business with Paycheck Protection Program paperwork, "or otherwise identifying a need in whatever community you are living in this summer and developing a way to meet it."
"Now more than ever, we are in this together, and our approach to community outreach is designed to reflect that," the email said.
The firm did not detail the minimum amount of time summer associates would need to commit. The email said summer associates would be contacted in the coming weeks with more details about the program and the community service aspect.
Simpson Thacher also said it anticipates "providing full-time offers in the normal course, just as we have done historically, upon the successful completion of our program." The summer program would still include the same opportunities to learn about the firm's practice groups, clients, and its deals, litigation and investigations, said the email, signed by Simpson Thacher hiring partners Rajib Chanda, Brooke Cucinella and Pete Gilman.
While Simpson's program appears unique in offering associates a stipend in exchange for community service, other firms are encouraging community service or pro bono work in their programs too.
Milbank told summer associates in an email this week that its program will incorporate pro bono. The program was delayed to June 8 and would be offered fully remotely, but the program would still last 10 weeks and participants would receive full pay. Besides roping in summer associates on related work for major bankruptcies and financings, Milbank said its summer associates would get involved in the firm's COVID-19 relief work, in which the firm is helping community groups in the distribution of relief funds and developing emergency grant agreements.
Meanwhile, Cahill Gordon & Reindel has said it would give its summer class a chance to assist remotely with the firm's pro bono work during its program. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati will give summer associates credit if they do six weeks of legal work for a qualified nonprofit organization of the associate's choice.
|Read More:
From Canceled to 'Business as Usual,' Law Firms Go Their Own Way on Summer Associate Programs
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readLatham's New Partner Class Leans Toward Corporate Practices
Law Firm Diversity Pros Fear for Future of DEI Efforts Under Trump Presidency
Big Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic About M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250