Associates Want a Break on Billable Hours as Pay Cuts Roil Law Firms
A new survey released by Major, Lindsey & Africa and Above the Law found that while law firms are getting high marks for communicating in the coronavirus crisis, many associates want lower billable hour targets in light of broad pay cuts and unusual working conditions.
May 14, 2020 at 01:54 PM
5 minute read
The coronavirus has changed how young lawyers work, but not how much they're expected to bill. Photo: fizkes/Shutterstock.com
Despite the global coronavirus pandemic shuttering offices and shifting law firms remote, the majority of law firm associates feel that their firms are communicating well and providing adequate mental health resources, according to a newly released survey conducted by Major, Lindsey & Africa and Above the Law.
But a drop in work across several practice areas combined with increased stress and family responsibilities at home has associates clamoring for firms to lower their billable hour target.
The survey, which polled more than 1,300 associates between April 13 and April 21, found that around 39% of associates have seen a decrease in their workload. And the fallout from the coronavirus pandemic has had an inconsistent effect: 57.8% of real estate associates, 42.8% of intellectual property associates, 41.7% of tax associates and 39.8% of corporate associates reported less work.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, bankruptcy and health care associates reported a 52.6% and 43.8% increase in work respectively. Around 61% of respondents said their work load has stayed consistent or increased.
Many respondents reported that the pandemic has affected their productivity as they deal with complicated family situations, the specter of unemployment and the isolation that has become a hallmark of the pandemic—as well as the constant news about death and sickness in their communities.
Around 11% of associates said their mental health was their primary concern. Nearly 75% of respondents said job security or cost-cutting measures were their top concerns amid the pandemic.
In spite of these challenges, the majority of associates commended their firms in how they're handling communication and mental health resources in response. Around 69% said they were satisfied with how often firm management was communicating. Nearly 58% of respondents were satisfied with the wellness resources their firms have created during the pandemic.
"What is really great to see is that firms have shifted dramatically from the way that they were communicating in the last recession in 2008," said Ru Bhatt, a partner in Major Lindsey's associate practice group. "Associates value transparency, and firms have acknowledged that, so communications have spiked."
Bhatt said many law firm managing partners are sending out clear, candid updates to their employees weekly. And many firms that had mental health programming before the pandemic hit have maintained their initiatives—some have even expanded access and bolstered those offerings.
Despite these resources, many associates are finding that law firms need to reduce billable hours given the broad pay cuts at many firms and the increased stress and turmoil caused by the pandemic.
Nearly a quarter of respondents said that they've received more work, even as many firms cut pay for associates by as much as 25%. An overwhelming majority of firms, 93.5%, have not adjusted billable hour targets, according to the respondents.
"At the end of the survey, we asked 'what would you like to be changed,' said Bhatt. "Billable hour changes were the top concern."
It is worth noting, though, that associates have advocated for reduced billable hour requirements even before the pandemic. In a 2019 associate survey, Major Lindsey found that 75% of associates would take a pay cut in exchange for reduced hours.
Gender and Tech
Gender also played a role in how a respondent thought about billable hour changes. Women were twice as likely to be concerned about billable hours compared with men—a trend Bhatt said could not be explained from the collected data.
Familiar gender lines also came through in the survey: Women were three times more likely to worry about child care amid the pandemic, while men were four times more likely to say their biggest concern was its effect on the partnership track.
"Unfortunately, the differences we found tend to fall around traditional gender norms," Bhatt said.
Looking toward the future, a vast majority of respondents believe the pandemic will forever change the business of law. Around 60% of the respondents believe that the crisis will lead to permanent changes in the legal industry with 30% saying they are unsure and just 10% saying that nothing will change.
Nearly 95% of the respondents who said the pandemic will lead to long-term change said that law firms will alter their remote work policies. Around 82% said that the crisis will change how law firms use technology. And 57% said that the amount or configuration of physical office space will see change as well.
Read More
Amid the Pandemic, These Law Firms Are Sticking With Their Mental Health Programs
Pay Cuts, Layoffs, and More: How Law Firms Are Managing the Pandemic
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All![White & Case Crosses $4M in PEP, $3B in Revenue in 'Breakthrough Year' White & Case Crosses $4M in PEP, $3B in Revenue in 'Breakthrough Year'](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/americanlawyer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/378/2024/03/Heather-McDevitt-767x633.jpg)
White & Case Crosses $4M in PEP, $3B in Revenue in 'Breakthrough Year'
6 minute read![Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://k2-prod-alm.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/brightspot/11/67/f75a9f5d46b08088f1ca60a48425/karp-clement-barr-767x633.jpg)
Lawyers Across Political Spectrum Launch Public Interest Team to Litigate Against Antisemitism
4 minute read![Munger, Gibson Dunn Billed $63 Million to Snap in 2024 Munger, Gibson Dunn Billed $63 Million to Snap in 2024](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/americanlawyer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/404/2023/01/Snapchat-App-004-767x633.jpg)
![Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders for Antitrust, Business and Tort Litigation and Latin America Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders for Antitrust, Business and Tort Litigation and Latin America](https://images.law.com/cdn-cgi/image/format=auto,fit=contain/https://images.law.com/americanlawyer/contrib/content/uploads/sites/402/2024/03/Jones-Day-sign-01-767x633.jpg)
Jones Day Names New Practice Leaders for Antitrust, Business and Tort Litigation and Latin America
Trending Stories
- 1NY No-Fault Insurance adopts Worker’s Compensation Fee Schedule
- 2With AI Expected to Be a Focus This Year, What Changes Can Midsize Firms Expect?
- 3Dissenter Blasts 4th Circuit Majority Decision Upholding Meta's Section 230 Defense
- 4NBA Players Association Finds Its New GC in Warriors Front Office
- 5DC Circuit Keeps Docs in Judge Newman's Misconduct Proceedings Sealed
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250