Lady Gaga's Law Firm Got Hacked. Now What?
Allen Grubman's New York firm says its celebrity clients have shown "overwhelming support" despite a multimillion-dollar ransomware demand. But do entertainment boutiques face special risks, both before and after an attack?
May 15, 2020 at 01:56 PM
5 minute read
Every law firm has to worry about data privacy. But when your clients are Madonna, Lizzo and Bruce Springsteen, the security of their personal information takes on a special edge.
New York-based Grubman Shire Meiselas & Sacks confirmed this week that it was hit by a ransomware attack, with the hackers reportedly demanding $21 million or they'll expose 756 gigabytes' worth of documents on the firm's clients, which also include AC/DC, Lady Gaga and Robert De Niro. Late in the week reports said the demand had been doubled, and paired with a threat to release "dirty laundry" on President Donald Trump.
"We have been informed by the experts and the FBI that negotiating with or paying ransom to terrorists is a violation of federal criminal law," a spokesman for the firm said in a statement. "Even when enormous ransoms have been paid, the criminals often leak the documents anyway."
The firm said it has received "overwhelming support" from its clients since the attack, but cybersecurity experts gave mixed assessments over whether founder Allen Grubman—whom Vanity Fair has called "the most powerful attorney in the music business"—will be able to walk from this breach entirely unscathed.
Grubman Shire might be aided by the fact that data breaches a lot more common these days, said Frank Gillman, a former Big Law chief information officer and a principal at Vertex Advisors Group.
"People in general are more understanding about companies being hit by ransomware because it's become more and more commonplace," Gillman said.
But law firms can face additional reputational peril because clients entrust them with so much confidential data, said Lisa Sotto, the chair of Hunton Andrews Kurth's global privacy and cybersecurity practice and the managing partner of its New York office.
"If I entrust my data to an organization and that trust is broken, very often than not, that individual will not renew that relationship with the organization," Sotto said. "I would expect some impact on business. Lately, it's almost inevitable a lawsuit is following a data breach."
In order to succeed on a data breach lawsuit, a plaintiff would need to prove the breach caused actual harm, Sotto said. That's a high bar, she said, but celebrity client might have an easier time arguing harm than plaintiffs in other data breach cases.
"This compendium of data is more sensitive than others," Sotto said, who noted that, with other data breaches, a victim can steps to mitigate the harm of identity theft or account fraud. "This data is much more difficult to contain the potential harm because it's so amorphous and reputationally damaging. There might be an easier bar to claiming harm here."
The A-list clientele of a law firm like Grubman Shire is also potentially exposed to blackmail and extortion, said Austin Berglas, a former FBI agent who is now the global head of professional services for BlueVoyant.
"They can reach out to the entertainers and extort them directly," Berglas said said of the cybercriminals.
Clients would be more likely to forgive a data breach—and have fewer avenues for redress—if it took place despite stringent cybersecurity measures and wasn't caused by the firm's negligence, said Jeffrey Brandt, the chief information officer of Jackson Kelly. Conversely, those clients could leave if they worry their personal data remains vulnerable, he added. Brandt noted, for instance, that he still shops at Walmart even though the retailer has suffered data breaches.
Although Grubman Shire is a small entertainment boutique with boldface name clients, its obligations—and vulnerabilities—parallel those of any other law firm. The firm said this week that it had informed all its clients of the breach and has been working with federal law enforcement as well as "the world's leading experts."
"It's incumbent on all firms in this day and age to pay attention to security," Brandt said.
Some boutique firms may have less resources available to pay for cybersecurity measures than a firm like DLA Piper—also a former victim of a high-profile cyber attack—or a company like Target, cybersecurity experts said. But small firms can still enact measures like two or multifactor authentication and train employees to spot phishing attempts.
Even so, a $400 million firewall can be rendered entirely useless if a person clicks on the wrong email, Berglas said.
"All it takes is one malicious phishing email to be clicked on by an employee in your financial department," Berglas said. "Now that bad actor has gained the username and password for that employee, and circumvented that wall."
Read More
More Than 100 Law Firms Have Reported Data Breaches. And the Problem Is Getting Worse
Law Firm Cybersecurity: See Which Firms Reported a Data Breach
How Vendor Data Breaches Are Putting Law Firms at Risk
Ransomware Attack on DLA Piper Puts Law Firms, Clients on Red Alert
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllGreenberg Traurig Litigation Co-Chair Returning After Three Years as US Attorney
3 minute readBlank Rome Snags Two Labor and Employment Partners From Stevens & Lee
4 minute read12-Partner Team 'Surprises' Atlanta Firm’s Leaders With Exit to Launch New Reed Smith Office
4 minute readAfter Breakaway From FisherBroyles, Pierson Ferdinand Bills $75M in First Year
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Settlement Allows Spouses of U.S. Citizens to Reopen Removal Proceedings
- 2CFPB Resolves Flurry of Enforcement Actions in Biden's Final Week
- 3Judge Orders SoCal Edison to Preserve Evidence Relating to Los Angeles Wildfires
- 4Legal Community Luminaries Honored at New York State Bar Association’s Annual Meeting
- 5The Week in Data Jan. 21: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250