'A Scary and Sad Time': Asian American GCs Talk About Current Racism
Somehow, I had a feeling this panel discussion would be different. And boy was it.
May 17, 2020 at 11:05 AM
4 minute read
|
I almost never cover panel discussions that dispense advice to lawyers on how to succeed, because they're usually so predictable. (How many times do you need to be told the importance of having a sponsor, learning the client's business and standing up straight?)
Somehow, though, I had a feeling this discussion would be different.
And boy was it.
Consisting of an all-star cast of Asian American general counsel at major companies—Don Liu of Target Corp., Amy Tu of Tyson Food Inc., Caroline Tsai of Western Union, Viet Dinh of Fox Corp., Michael Wu of Madewell Inc. and Thomas Kim of Thomson Reuters—most of the panelists on the Zoom conference sponsored by National Asian Pacific American Bar Association (NAPABA) were unusually frank, particularly about the current climate of racism.
As you probably know, Asians are getting battered during this pandemic. According to a new Ipsos survey conducted for the Center for Public Integrity, more than 30% of Americans have witnessed people of Asian descent getting blamed for the coronavirus pandemic. And just a few days ago, President Donald Trump, who's habitually called COVID-19 the "Chinese virus," added fuel to this issue when he told CBS News reporter Weijia Jiang to "ask China" when she confronted him on his response to a question about testing for the virus.
So how do these GCs take recent events on the Asian American community? Very personally.
"It's very frustrating," said Kim of Thomson Reuters. "As a media executive, we have to change the narrative for Asian Pacific Americans. We are the doctors and nurses on the front lines; we are the small business owners providing consumers with necessary items; we are the essential workers. But too often, the narrative is that we're the 'other.' "
"It's a scary and sad time," said Tsai of Western Union. "I'm a proud American, but some people don't see me as American." That discrimination extends to her son, who, she said, was called "Ching Chong" by classmates. "As a mother, I was so worried, but he told me he used humor [to defuse the situation]."
Like Tsai, Wu of Madewell, seemed stunned that his child is now experiencing the same type of bigotry he had decades ago in America. "In eighth grade in Georgia, I was called every derogatory term, and now my child has been on the receiving end of that same discrimination."
But of all the GCs at the discussion, Tu of Tyson was the most blunt: "I'm extremely disappointed in this country," she said upfront. "People who work in our community—which are a lot of immigrants, including Asians—are being discriminated against. They can't get served; they can't get a haircut. They're harassed." And she minced no words about the reason: "It's because of their race and what's happened in the media. It shows a failure of leadership."
(At this point, you might have noticed that several people on the panel complained about the media's vilification of Asians and other minorities. It would have been interesting if Dinh of Fox News, which has consistently called COVID-19 the "Chinese virus," had jumped in, but he steered clear. Dinh, however, did talk about how Fox safeguards its news staff: "We are purveyors of First Amendment activity." He added, "The information we bring is essential to the well-being and orderly running of our society, and we make sure that our news correspondents are safe.")
So what will make a difference in this current climate? Most seem to agree that Asian American GCs should not be silent. "Stand up, stand proud—but at a safe distance," said Kim. "We have a voice," added Tu. "And as general counsel, we can't turn a blind eye."
Target's Liu proposed another solution: Enlist a wide network of supporters. During one of Target's "listening sessions" that got quite emotional, recalled Liu, "one of the non-Asians said it should be us who steps in to make sure that our Asian American friends aren't discriminated."
They are all correct. Unfortunately, however, I think it's going to take a while until the narrative of Asian Americans as the latest bogeyman changes.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAs Big Law Walks a Tightrope, Herbert Smith Freehills Refuses to Lose Its Footing
8 minute readHoly Grail: Can Changing Big Law Recruiting, Hiring and Training Lead to Greater Retention?
10 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Tuesday Newspaper
- 2Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-85
- 3Decision of the Day: Administrative Court Finds Prevailing Wage Law Applies to Workers Who Cleaned NYC Subways During Pandemic
- 4Trailblazing Broward Judge Retires; Legacy Includes Bush v. Gore
- 5Federal Judge Named in Lawsuit Over Underage Drinking Party at His California Home
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250