California Firms Throughout the Am Law 200 Coasted in 2019
Across the state, most firms outpaced the industry average for growth last year.
May 18, 2020 at 09:52 AM
4 minute read
It seems like an eternity ago now, but 2019 proved to be a banner year for the blue-chip law firms with roots in Southern California and the San Francisco Bay Area.
What data are you using to stand out in a crowded market? Get the interactive Am Law 200 Data exclusively with Legal Compass. |The two highest-grossing firms with historic ties to Los Angeles—Latham & Watkins and Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher—both posted double-digit revenue increases. Latham grew by 11.3%, while Gibson Dunn grew by 10.4%.
"Across practice groups, across offices, it was a fabulous year," says Gibson Dunn's Los Angeles-based chairman and managing partner Kenneth Doran, whose firm crossed the $2 billion mark for the first time.
Two other large SoCal-based firms, Sheppard Mullin and Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith, also had years to be proud of, with the former showing a 13% boost in revenue and the latter hitting 16.3%.
The news was also good for the biggest players in Northern California, with their strong ties to the Bay Area's tech economy. Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati led the way with 12.1% growth, followed by Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe at 10.8%, Morrison & Foerster at 10%, Fenwick & West at 9.8% and Cooley at 8.4%. All of this came in a year in which the average Am Law 200 firm grew its revenue by 5%—a strong result that was buoyed by the major steps forward among the California elites.
Cooley CEO and chairman Joe Conroy calls 2019 an "amazing" year on the corporate side, pointing to high demand for work on venture financing and big-time deals involving tech businesses.
Success also accrued to a range of other California firms with widely differing characteristics. San Francisco-based Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, which has offices in every state in the country, jumped into the Am Law 100 with an 11.9% climb in revenue.
In the Second Hundred, Los Angeles-based Buchalter posted its second straight year of growth in excess of 15%, hitting 17.3%. Orange County-based intellectual property specialists Knobbe Martens grew revenue by 12.1%. And 170-attorney, San Francisco-based Hanson Bridgett was one of three firms to spring onto the Am Law 200 for the first time.
What data are you leveraging to sell strategy internally? Get the interactive Am Law 200 Data exclusively with Legal Compass. |"It was the strength of the economy and, particularly, California's position within the global economy," San Francisco-based recruiter Avis Caravello says. "Tech, private equity, venture capital, biotech—it was just a perfect alignment."
While most firms delivered growth in 2019, both nationally and especially in California, Los Angeles' Irell & Manella saw revenue and head count contract for a fourth straight year. The firm's top line dropped by 12% to $151.6 million, while its 87 lawyers are a fraction of the 199 who called the firm home in 2009. This February, the firm announced a strategy that put the declines in context: It was largely abandoning transactional work to focus on high-value litigation.
With the economic consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic still unfolding, it wouldn't be shocking to see other firms make similar bold strategic choices. But Caravello believes the largest firms in California are well positioned to withstand the stresses of the moment, particularly in comparison to the experience of the dot-com bust in the early 2000s.
"These California firms are global firms now," she says. "I think they are on much stronger footing, much like their New York counterparts have always been, to weather the economic instability that we're currently facing."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDechert 'Spark Tank' Competition Encourages Firmwide Innovation Focus
Akerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Virginia Griffith, Director of Business Development at OutsideGC
- 2Legal Speak at General Counsel Conference East 2024: Bill Tanenbaum, Partner & Chair, AI & Data Law Practice Group at Moses Singer
- 3Morgan & Morgan Looks to Grow Into Complex Litigation While Still Keeping its Billboards Up
- 4Thursday Newspaper
- 5Public Notices/Calendars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250