Chicago Outpaced the Industry in 2019—and the Biggest Firms Reaped the Rewards
The Windy CIty's top-tier firms outperformed those in the Second Hundred.
May 18, 2020 at 09:32 AM
4 minute read
Revenue growth among law firms based or founded in Chicago occurred on a stratified basis in 2019, with those toward the top of the Am Law 200 seeing larger growth than those toward the bottom.
Of the 14 Am Law 200 firms that either call Chicago home or have deep roots here, six—Kirkland & Ellis, Sidley Austin, Mayer Brown, McDermott Will & Emery, Seyfarth Shaw and Katten Muchin Rosenman—posted gains that exceeded the average 5% growth the Am Law 200 saw last year. All six of those firms are in the top 70 of the Am Law 200.
"On most of the key metrics, Chicago, on a one-, three- and five-year look, is performing roughly in line with the Am Law 100, if not better than the Am Law 100," says Kent Zimmermann, a Zeughauser Group consultant based in Chicago.
The other three Chicago firms in the Am Law 100—Baker McKenzie, Jenner & Block and Winston & Strawn—grew their top lines by 0.7%, 1.5% and 2.1%, respectively. Baker McKenzie's lackluster growth led to it being overtaken by DLA Piper for third place on the Am Law 100. Winston's growth was enough for it to break into the $1 billion club, while Jenner reversed a four-year revenue slide.
As a group, the nine Am Law 100 firms averaged 5.65% revenue growth in 2019.
By contrast, three Chicago firms in the Second Hundred saw their receipts shrink last year. Hinshaw & Culbertson had the biggest drop among the cohort, as it saw its revenue fall by 7.2% in 2019, continuing a slide the firm has been on since reaching its peak in 2015.
Schiff Hardin had the second-biggest drop in 2019, at 3.3%, also continuing a slide for the fourth year in a row. Despite the drop, Schiff Hardin managing partner Marci Eisenstein told The American Lawyer in mid-March that the firm "feels very good about last year," pointing to the flat growth the firm saw in its revenue per lawyer and profits per equity partner numbers as positive news. Vedder Price, meanwhile, saw its overall revenue drop by 0.8% in 2019.
The five Second Hundred firms averaged a revenue decline of 1.16%.
A common thread linking many high-performing firms has been their investments into private equity, which is an important part of the Chicago economy, Zimmermann says. The fact that firms like Kirkland and Sidley have been able to build up and branch out from Chicago speaks to the overall strength of the market, he says.
"Kirkland is known for its strengths in many areas, but many would observe that private equity has been essential to its ascent," Zimmermann says. "You've seen many other firms in Chicago and around the country learn from that."
The Windy City is an attractive destination for most law firms, but not as attractive as New York and Northern California, Zimmermann says. Chicago has lower rates than those markets, which can be off-putting for firms based in New York and London, he adds.
But that's not always the case, Zimmermann notes. In 2019, Eversheds Sutherland, which has roots in both London and Atlanta, and Blank Rome of Philadelphia opened their own offices in Chicago. So far this year, New York-based Willkie Farr & Gallagher and Texas-based Hilliard Martinez Gonzales have made plans to open outposts in Chicago with prominent partners from Jenner and Kirkland, respectively.
A number of Chicago-based Am Law 200 firms, including Baker McKenzie, McDermott, Schiff Hardin and Winston reported various staffing and pay cuts in an effort to weather the COVID-19 pandemic's economic storm. Noting the economic pain that has hit businesses across the country, Chicago-based legal consultant Kay Hoppe predicts many firms would be perfectly happy to see their revenue stay flat this year.
"I don't think there's any firm in the city that wouldn't be happy going back to last year's numbers," Hoppe says. "That would be a huge victory."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Look to Gen Z for AI Skills, as 'Data Becomes the Oil of Legal'
Law Firms Expand Scope of Immigration Expertise Amid Blitz of Trump Orders
6 minute readLosses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250