For Those Knocking on the Door of the Am Law 200, Smaller Stature May Be an Asset
"When you have 1,000 or 2,000 lawyers, it's harder to turn and harder to make changes," says Max Crane, managing partner of Newark, New Jersey-based Sills Cummis & Gross, one of 11 firms on the cusp of the Am Law 200.
May 18, 2020 at 09:45 AM
4 minute read
Being big has its virtues, but in the present moment midsize law firms—many of which occupy the Am Law 200 or compose the group next in line for entry—are finding advantages in their smaller stature.
What data are you using to stand out in a crowded market? Get the interactive Am Law 200 Data exclusively with Legal Compass. |Industry observers and midsize law firm leaders, including two whose firms are among those knocking at the door of the Am Law 200, say that in a time of economic and social upheaval, bigger may not, in fact, be better.
"When you have 1,000 or 2,000 lawyers, it's harder to turn and harder to make changes," says Max Crane, managing partner of Newark, New Jersey-based Sills Cummis & Gross, which last year grew revenue 3.1% to $93 million. "We're big enough to handle the biggest matters but we're pretty nimble. We can change on a dime. We can make short-term changes as needed, and we can make long-term changes if needed."
At a time when changes are needed at nearly every firm, that could give firms such as Sills Cummis and others like it a leg up on some of the competition ahead of them on the Am Law 200.
Chris Gibson, president of Haddonfield, New Jersey-based Archer & Greiner, which was the last firm on the 2017 Am Law 200 and could rejoin if it manages another year of 7.1% revenue growth, as it did in 2019 to reach $95.5 million, shares Crane's perspective, even down to the wording.
"One of the differences between an Am Law 100 or 150 firm and those of us floating around the 200, one of the things I have is an opportunity to be a heck of a lot more nimble," Gibson says. "It's one of the few advantages you have of not having all these international offices and leases. … I have a cost structure that allows me to make modest changes in terms of saving money right now until we see what develops, but also being able to spend money to bring people on when we think it's a good fit and mix with our firm."
Both Crane and Gibson say their firms have made strategic hires even since the coronavirus crisis began, and that they plan to be opportunistic in the coming months.
"I haven't honestly changed our basic plans when it comes to trying to expand in practice areas or trying to expand in geographic areas," Gibson says. "It's just a little more daunting and difficult to achieve these days."
What data are you leveraging to sell strategy internally? Get the interactive Am Law 200 Data exclusively with Legal Compass. |The American Lawyer tracked data for 11 firms that fell between $101 million in 2019 revenue—the cutoff for the Am Law 200—and $82.5 million. They range in head count from 202, at Riverside, California-based Best Best & Krieger, which had $96.5 million in revenue, to the Groom Law Group in Washington, D.C., a benefits, health and retirement firm that brought in $88.3 million with just 76 attorneys, a $1.16 million revenue per lawyer figure that was higher than all but 36 firms on the Am Law 100.
Veteran legal consultant Jeff Coburn says there are plenty of midsize firms that try to grow by "doing things that are crazy" and don't last, but those that are focused—"depth over breadth," he argues—can find a good home around the size of firms such as Sills Cummis and Archer & Greiner.
And for those that cater to the sort of midsize company that needs a trusted adviser now more than ever, this is the time to shine as clients come to them with questions about employment issues, government loans, banking, revenue losses and more.
"I think these law firms are going to have growth, frankly," Coburn says. "There are going to be opportunities for them."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDechert 'Spark Tank' Competition Encourages Firmwide Innovation Focus
Akerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250