Outside Interest Weighed Down Texas-Based Firms in 2019
Five of the nine Texas firms on the Am Law 200 improved revenue in 2019, but only Jackson Walker moved up in the rankings.
May 18, 2020 at 09:42 AM
5 minute read
As out-of-state firms continued to set up shop in Texas—hiring laterals and vying for work—local firms felt the pinch in 2019, which may have dampened the 2019 financial performance of the nine Texas-founded firms among the Am Law 200.
What data are you using to stand out in a crowded market? Get the interactive Am Law 200 Data exclusively with Legal Compass. |Revenue increased at five of those nine Texas firms, but only one—Jackson Walker—gained ground in the rankings. With a 10.3% increase in revenue in 2019, Jackson Walker was No. 115, up four spots from the year before. The Dallas-based firm's jump in revenue came with a 6% increase in lawyer head count.
Other Texas firms also posted revenue increases, including 5.9% growth at Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld; 6.1% at Vinson & Elkins; and 10.7% at Baker Botts.
The Citi Private Bank Law Firm Group's report on 2019 found that revenue growth and demand at Texas-headquartered firms trailed the rest of the legal industry, although Lone Star State firms led the market in making rate increases stick. Citi reported that demand in Texas dropped 1.6%, the worst of the 11 regions in the country, in 2019, compared with an increase of 1.1% nationally.
The Citi data suggests that the out-of-state firms opening Texas offices—more than half of the Am Law 200 have planted flags in Texas—may be taking away from the performance of local firms. Gretta Rusanow, head of advisory services for Citi's Law Firm Group, says Texas-founded firms faced a challenging demand environment in 2019 because of all those new firms "taking clients and matters into their fold."
Nevertheless, the nine Texas firms largely had at least a decent year in 2019. Akin Gump and Vinson & Elkins were among the 30 Super Rich firms that posted revenue per lawyer in excess of $1.1 million in 2019 and profits per lawyer of more than $500,000.
Eight of the nine firms improved revenue per lawyer, with Thompson & Knight the exception. Six of the nine firms posted higher profits per equity partner in 2019—Akin Gump, Vinson & Elkins, Haynes and Boone, Jackson Walker, Bracewell and Winstead.
Only four of the firms grew their head count in 2019, including Akin Gump, Vinson & Elkins, Baker Botts and Jackson Walker.
A merger can be a quick way to boost head count, but Texas firms were involved in only six mergers in 2019, according to the Altman Weil MergerLine, with the largest being Midwest firm Spencer Fane's expansion into Houston when it acquired 19-lawyer Zimmerman, Axelrad, Stern & Wise. That relatively small merger contrasts with 2018, when three large Texas firms—Andrews Kurth Kenyon, Strasburger & Price and Gardere Wynne Sewell—were involved in mergers with large out-of-state firms, disrupting the homegrown market.
In part due to the incursion of firms into Texas, lateral hiring continued at a heavy clip throughout 2019. But it's uncertain whether that high level of hiring will continue in 2020 because of the coronavirus crisis.
Recruiter Lee Allbritton of Amicus Search says he's noticed that hiring in the Texas market has changed since firms started working remotely in mid-March and began dealing with the double whammy of the national economic downturn and the steep drop in oil prices. Many firms are taking steps to cut costs by laying off or furloughing lawyers or staff, or reducing pay.
What data are you leveraging to sell strategy internally? Get the interactive Am Law 200 Data exclusively with Legal Compass. |Since the crisis began, Allbritton says, the firms engaged in hiring are either nimble midsize firms with low overhead or Texas boutiques. Hiring by Big Law has been the exception to the rule, he says.
"Every now and then you will see a large firm make a hire. The only people you are seeing hired by an Am Law firm are people who were in the process in February," he says.
"There was either an articulated hiring freeze, or an unarticulated hiring freeze. Part of it is political," the veteran Texas recruiter says. "How can you ask partners across the country who are absorbing austerity measures to invest in a new partner?"
|Read More:
Law Firm Expansion in Texas Continued at Strong Clip in 2019
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSimpson Thacher Partner Moves to Vinson & Elkins as Co-Head of Strategic M&A
3 minute readFreshfields, Paul Hastings, McDermott, Alston Hire in Core Practices, Amid Flurry of Q4 Lateral Moves
5 minute readMorgan Lewis, Mayer Brown Add New Partners in Chicago
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250