The Money Rolled Right in for Am Law 200 Firms in the Midwest
With a global pandemic far from anyone's mind, law firms based outside Chicago saw a boom in mergers last year and grew their revenues faster than those inside the region's biggest commercial and financial hub.
May 21, 2020 at 03:40 PM
4 minute read
Law firms based in Midwestern cities outside of Chicago saw, on average, better revenue growth than the firms based in the Windy City as well as the Am Law 200 as a whole.
All 25 Am Law 200 firms that are based or founded in the Midwest saw their revenue grow in 2019. Seven of them—Barnes & Thornburg, Benesch, Ice Miller, Polsinelli, Porter Wright Morris & Arthur, Robins Kaplan and Spencer Fane—posted double-digit gains, far exceeding the average 5% growth the Am Law 200 and the 5.65% growth Chicago-based firms saw last year. Midwestern firms on average saw their revenue grow by 7.76%.
"It was a banner year for the firm in a lot of ways," said Gregg Eisenberg, the managing partner of Benesch, during a March interview. The Cleveland-based law firm saw its revenue rise by a record-breaking 25.2% last year.
This analysis of the Am Law 200 data meshes with a similar finding made from an analysis of data compiled by Citi Private Bank's law firm lending and consulting unit earlier this year. According to Citi, Midwestern law firms located outside of Chicago had a better financial performance in 2019 on average than firms in the city, despite its role as the region's largest commercial and financial hub.
"There's a middle of the road that's getting more attention," said Joshua Lorentz, the chair of Dinsmore & Shohl's intellectual property department. Dinsmore in 2019 saw its overall revenue rise by 8.2%.
The Midwest was the home to the largest U.S. law merger announcements in 2019, all of which became effective in the first quarter of this year. Faegre Baker Daniels, a Minneapolis firm ranked 71st on the Am Law 100, merged with Drinker Biddle & Reath, a Philadelphia firm ranked 90th, to become Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath. Lathrop Gage, a Kansas City, Missouri-based firm ranked 184th on the Am Law 200, merged with Minneapolis-based Gray Plant Mooty to become Lathrop GPM.
Faegre Baker Daniels and Lathrop Gage had relatively modest growth in the last year before their mergers, seeing their top lines grow by 1.6% and 2.4% respectively. Drinker Biddle, Faegre's merger partner, saw its revenue shrink by 4.1% in 2019.
Additionally, Cincinnati-based Taft Stettinius & Hollister merged with Briggs & Morgan, also a Minnesota firm—extending a particularly notable legal market boom for Minneapolis. And when global mega-firm Dentons launching its "Golden Spike" strategy last year, aiming to grow across the U.S., it began by combining with Indianapolis-based Bingham Greenebaum Doll and Pittsburgh-based Cohen & Grigsby.
Strong 2019 revenues propelled St. Louis-based Husch Blackwell out of the Am Law Second Hundred entirely, with gains of 7.6% placing the firm in the Am Law 100. The firm has expanded in secondary and tertiary markets that have been largely ignored by bigger firms, allowing it to tap lawyers in underpriced markets for projects emanating from more expensive cities.
Like their counterparts in Chicago and across the country, Am Law 200 firms operating in the Midwest—including Dickinson Wright, Dinsmore, Dorsey & Whitney, Faegre Drinker, Husch Blackwell, Ice Miller, Shook Hardy, Stinson, Taft and Thompson Hine—have all taken steps to shore up their financial positions due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
Dinsmore has furloughed staffers whose jobs could not be done remotely, Lorentz said, despite what he described as positive 2020 revenue into April.
"We haven't seen much of a decrease that our other friends have seen," Lorentz said. "We continue to look forward and budget for what could happen."
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrom ‘Deep Sadness’ to Little Concern, Gaetz’s Nomination Draws Sharp Reaction From Lawyers
7 minute readDechert 'Spark Tank' Competition Encourages Firmwide Innovation Focus
Akerman Opens Charlotte Office With Focus on Renewable Energy, Data Center Practices
4 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
- Cohen & Grigsby, P.C.
- Polsinelli
- Ice Miller
- Dorsey & Whitney
- Briggs and Morgan
- Benesch
- Lathrop Gage
- Barnes & Thornburg
- Thompson Hine
- Bingham Greenebaum Doll LLP
- Shook Hardy & Bacon
- Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
- Taft Stettinius & Hollister
- Dickinson Wright
- Spencer Fane Britt & Browne
- Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
- Faegre Baker Daniels
- Barnes Thornburg
- Husch Blackwell
- Robins Kaplan LLP
- Gray, Plant, Mooty, Mooty & Bennett, P.A.
- Dentons
Trending Stories
- 1While Data Breaches May Lead to Years of Legal Battles, Cyberattacks Can be Prevented
- 2The Definition of Special Employment
- 3People in the News—Nov. 21, 2024—Willig Williams, Hangley Aronchick
- 4Rawle & Henderson Hires New Del. Managing Partner
- 5Divided State Court Reinstates Dispute Over Replacement Vehicles Fees
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250