SpaceX Set To Blast Off From US Soil With Boost From Big Law
Squire Patton Boggs is among a group of law firms whose work on behalf of SpaceX helped lead to today's historic launch.
May 27, 2020 at 03:27 PM
4 minute read
For the first time since 2011, the United States will launch astronauts into space from its home soil. And for the first time ever, the rocket that will get them there was developed and manufactured by a private company—and it's one that has a history with Big Law.
Space Exploration Technologies Corp., better known as SpaceX, the aerospace company founded by Tesla's Elon Musk in 2002 with the ambition to send manned spacecraft to Mars, was set to launch its Falcon 9 rocket and Crew Dragon spacecraft from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida at 4:33 p.m. Eastern Wednesday.
But gray skies and choppy waters delayed the launch, The New York Times reported. The next opportunities to get the shuttle into orbit are Saturday, May 30, at 3:22 eastern and Sunday, May 31, at 3:00 eastern.
The launch, when it does happen, is possible in no small part because of the work done by various Big Law firms on the company's behalf over the years, most notably the lobbying efforts of Washington, D.C.-based Squire Patton Boggs.
Squire has been the lobbying law firm of choice for SpaceX for a decade, and that decade has proved fruitful for both the company and the law firm. SpaceX has come close to quadrupling its lobbying spend since 2010, when the company spent about $560,000, according to Open Secrets. In 2019, that number was over $2.3 million, of which $320,000 went to Squire.
Since 2011, SpaceX has paid Squire over $3 million in lobbying fees, including $80,000 so far in 2020. During that time, the company has seen its market valuation skyrocket to over $36 billion.
There is some star power among the Squire attorneys listed as counsel for SpaceX, including former Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott and former Louisiana Sen. John Breaux, both of whom joined the firm during its 2010 acquisition of the Breaux-Lott Leadership Group, which also did work for SpaceX.
SpaceX has turned to firms including K&L Gates, Boies Schiller Flexner, Drinker Biddle & Reath and Cooley for its various legal needs over the years, including a breach of contract suit and antitrust litigation.
In 2014, Rick Vacura, then a Morrison & Foerster partner, helped SpaceX fend off a challenge to the federal contract that led to Wednesday's launch. Another company, Sierra Nevada Corp., had challenged NASA's award of over $6 billion in contracts to SpaceX and Boeing, but the Government Accountability Office rejected Sierra's objections, paving the way for the Dragon program to proceed.
Vacura, who chaired the government contracts practice at Morrison & Foerster, left SpaceX behind as a client when he joined King & Spalding earlier this year, however, according to a King & Spalding spokesperson.
Morrison & Foerster also defended SpaceX in antitrust suits in California against defense contracting heavyweights Boeing and Lockheed Martin.
While NASA has not been launching from U.S. soil, the space agency has still been sending astronauts into space. The U.S. has been piggybacking off of Russian rockets launched from Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan since 2011, with Russia charging about $75 million to send an astronaut into space.
Boeing's Starliner, the company's answer to SpaceX's Dragon, costs about $90 million per astronaut. SpaceX is estimating its costs to be about $55 million per astronaut.
|Read More:
Do You Have the Right Stuff to be a Space Lawyer?
Daily Dicta: How Quinn Emanuel Team Beat $190M Defamation Suit Against Elon Musk by British Caver
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250