Pandemic Slows Lateral Hiring as Firms Look for Guaranteed Winners
The COVID-19 crisis has cast a pall over the lateral market, but "unicorn" partners and groups in hot practices are still forcing firms into competition.
May 28, 2020 at 04:26 PM
5 minute read
Lateral partner moves between law firms have hit the skids, as most pre-COVID-19 deals have now run their course and both firms and partners are grappling with economic uncertainty and logistical barriers.
Still, opportunistic firms are looking to lure top prospects, and some partners are receptive.
Bringing on a lateral partner is a time-consuming and expensive prospect on its own, but because the pandemic has left a portion of the legal industry scrambling for cash, law firms are currently looking for proven winners—individual lawyers or groups that have high profiles or are known rainmakers, according to several legal recruiters.
"Firms are calling us just like they have previously, but firms have always expressed a preference for groups. Now I'm hearing only groups," said Lauren Drake, a partner at Mlegal Group. Drake said the number of deals her group is working on is down by a third, but the dollar value of the deals has stayed the same because they're working on eight group deals involving five or more lawyers.
Groups are preferred, Drake said, because they can generate revenue on their own without a lot of investment from the firm. Some firms might be running low on cash, so they don't want to make an investment in a lateral partner.
"It doesn't necessarily signal the firm is in crisis, but they're dealing with a lot of uncertainty about what their client activity is going to look like," Drake said.
Some firms have told Keith Wetmore, the managing director of Major, Lindsey & Africa's San Francisco office, that they're "out of the lateral partner market until they know what the bottom looks like." Other firms are slow-walking the process intentionally, he added.
"Other firms put on a good face and say, 'Oh yeah, we're definitely in the market.' And then you submit a candidate they would have drooled over a year ago, four months ago, and they will pass on them," Wetmore said. "When you scratch the surface, you find out the only thing firms are interested are what I call 'the COVID unicorn.'"
The COVID unicorn, as Wetmore puts it, is a partner with a practice in either bankruptcy and restructuring or in health care. Law firms are also interested in partners with experience in private equity and data privacy, said Sabina Lippman, a partner and co-founder of Lippman Jungers.
To be sure, lateral partner activity hasn't utterly halted in any practice area. This week, the co-chair of Williams & Connolly's patent litigation practice departed for Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, and Sidley Austin poached a 23-year Cooley veteran for its emerging companies practice, among other moves. Recruiters like Dan Scott, the director of the legal practice group at Angott Search Group, said if partners have an attractive practice, "someone is getting off the pot" and hiring them.
"The marginal people, we're not being told those deals are dead. We're being told: 'Wait,'" Scott said.
But lateral partner activity has certainly slowed down during the pandemic. ALM's Legal Compass, which tracks lateral moves, has shown a sharp drop in moves from Jan. 1 to Memorial Day 2020 when compared to the same time period last year. Alisa Levin, a New York-based recruiter at Greene-Levin-Snyder, said "nothing got started for the first month" when law firms were pivoting toward remote operations.
Meanwhile, publicity surrounding the steps many firms have taken recently to shore up their finances has lateral partners asking a lot more questions about the health of their suitors, Drake and Lippman both noted separately.
"People are paying a lot of attention to what firms are doing in terms of layoffs and pay cuts," Lippman said. These partners want to know if these measures—such as staff furloughs or reduced partner draws—are temporary, she added.
"Will they change it immediately, or is it a sign of a larger problem?" Lippman said. Drake noted that lateral partners her recruiting firm has placed are going to law firms that have enacted pay cuts and furloughs.
Despite the current environment, a number of recruiters believe the lateral market will improve as the economy improves and law firms have a better understanding of how they'll perform financially this year. Partners who are reticent about entering the lateral market right now can use this time to shore up their business plan, Wetmore suggested.
Some recruiters, whose livelihoods depend on a robust lateral market, were even more bullish. Levin said interest is already picking up "substantially," saying the disruption she saw was just a "pause" from firms focusing on moving to virtual operations. Lippman said more of her clients have asked her to resume the lateral partner deals and searches they were pursuing. Scott said he anticipates having a normal year, business-wise.
"When we do go back, the economy is going to roar," Scott said.
Christine Simmons contributed to this report.
Read More
With Economy on the Brink, Will the Lateral Partner Market Dry Up?
To Laterals in the Covid-19 Era: Be Ready for Your Close-Up
As Coronavirus Ravages the Economy, Bankruptcy Attorneys Prepare for the Flood
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid to Practice Law in U.S. on Indefinite Hold, as Arizona Justices Exercise Caution
Orrick Hires Longtime Weil Partner as New Head of Antitrust Litigation
Sidley Adds Ex-DOJ Criminal Division Deputy Leader, Paul Hastings Adds REIT Partner, in Latest DC Hiring
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250