Boies Schiller Flexner to Replace Associate Formula Bonus System With Market Rate Scheme
Advocates say the new system is a step toward transparency for the notoriously opaque firm. Critics say the old formula-based system was intrinsic to BSF's entrepreneurial culture.
May 29, 2020 at 02:44 PM
4 minute read
Boies Schiller Flexner is changing its associate bonus structure from a formula system to a "market-rate" system that pays associates based on seniority instead of billable hours, according to several sources close to the firm.
The changes were announced this month, according to two people familiar with the decision.
In a statement, co-managing partner Nick Gravante confirmed that Boies Schiller is adopting a new associate compensation system, although he did not provide further details about the previous formula system or that the new system would be market-based. He said the compensation changes are a "positive step in the firm's ongoing restructuring, which ensure that associate compensation is aligned with the firm's strategic goals."
Gravante also confirmed that current Boies Schiller associates may choose which bonus structure to be compensated with. "We believe associates are substantially benefited by having the option of staying with our current system or choosing the new system," he added.
The change aligns the firm more closely with peers such as Cravath, Swaine & Moore and its so-called "Cravath Scale," which pays associates based on class year, three sources with knowledge of the changes at Boies Schiller said.
A source close to the firm said the new system pays associates bonuses on a scale slightly higher than the market rate set by Milbank in late 2019, which started at $15,000 for first-year associates and progressed up to $100,000 for senior associates. Some details of the new system still need to be worked out before the changes are fully implemented, other sources said.
The new bonus system has been in the works for months, with those who favored the market bonus scale advocating that it is more transparent and fair. Co-managing partner Natasha Harrison is a fierce advocate for this change, sources said, while Gravante favored the formula system.
The discussion over whether to change the system was divided on several fault lines. New York associates, who bill on high-volume matters for banks and other financial institutions, liked the formula system—as did newer associates who were bringing in bonuses higher than the market rate, one source said.
Those who favored the formula system felt it was in line with the Boies Schiller's "eat-what-you-kill," entrepreneurial culture where those who worked more were rewarded with bonuses that could climb into the hundreds of thousands.
Associates who take contingency cases, mid- and senior-level associates and California attorneys, whose clients often held them to more stringent billing standards than their East Coast peers, mostly preferred the market system, according to two sources.
While the previous system allowed first-, second- and third-year associates to take home bonuses much larger than their peers at other firms, mid-level and senior-level associates were paid out less than their peers for comparable hours, sources close to Boies Schiller said.
Critics of the formula system also said it was opaque and disincentivized careful billing. Associates who did not hit their minimum hours would be put "in the red," meaning that they had to make up the money and hours the following year. One former Boies Schiller attorney equated this rollover to a "debtor's prison."
The new compensation system is an effort to bring more transparency to the firm, where office managing partners and executive committee members are left in the dark regarding equity and compensation, sources close to the firm said. This lack of transparency in pay, in addition to Boies' work for controversial clients and his near-total control of the firm, were major contributors to a recent exodus of partners, as Law.com reported late last month.
More than 30 partners have left the firm since Gravante and Harrison took over for David Boies and Jonathan Schiller in December, including almost all off the firm's West Coast partners.
Boies Schiller leadership has maintained that the transition is simply a retrenchment and firmwide transformation. Still, many of the partners who left were office managing partners, executive committee members and productive attorneys who had relationships with clients such as Uber, Facebook and Goldman Sachs.
|Read More
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250