COVID-19: Gender Equality Advocate?
In the age of Zoom meetings and remote work, men and women are finally on a level playing field.
May 29, 2020 at 12:00 PM
4 minute read
"You know what's refreshing?" asks a senior female lawyer who works in the financial sector. "They're not going anywhere. They can't go to steak dinners, their favorite cigar bars or fly off to the Masters. And they're not dragging their golf bags into the office and running out in the middle of the afternoon for 'client development.' They're stuck—like we are."
She adds, "Let's see how long they can last!"
The coronavirus as an agent for gender equality? That's probably not what you're hearing, but some women contend that the lockdown is actually leveling the playing field in the workplace—and they're crowing about it.
Not only has COVID-19 thrown a monkey wrench at all those favorite male activities, but it's forcing men and women to interact with each other on a much more equal basis at work.
Take those Zoom meetings, for example. Now, both men and women occupy the same little square on the computer screen. It's reducing everyone to the same size—literally.
Oh, I know what you're going to say: Men are probably hogging the air time with their booming voices on videoconferences. Interestingly, though, that's not what I'm hearing.
"People are generally more cautious with etiquette, not to speak over others and to gauge the cadence of the group conversation," says Katherine "Kassie" Helm, an intellectual property partner at Dechert. Zoom etiquette, she adds, has now attained the status of a must-have skill set.
While men might be holding their male privilege in check on Zoom at this particular moment, does anyone believe that male bonding and cronyism are truly dead? Don't be naive.
"I assume the exclusionary in-person bonding is being replaced with an electronic camaraderie we may not be part of," says Jane Shay Wald, partner emeritus at Irell & Manella, who chairs the firm's trademark practice. She suspects that men are "selectively emailing each other, and not cc'ing the group."
Indeed, a male lawyer at an Am Law 100 firm confirms Wald's fear: "If two guys are doing buddy things like golf or fishing in normal times, they most likely are doing virtual things like texting each other inside jokes or playing video games or online poker or countless other virtual activities in the time of pandemic."
But Wald says women should play the same game, too. "We don't need a tee time or skybox tickets to privately follow up a Zoom conversation with a colleague or client," says Wald, adding that people also crave one-on-one interaction right now. Wald also cautions, "Women shouldn't get lulled into the illusion that the changes brought on by COVID-19 will stay."
Indeed, boys will likely still be boys. Yet, some women predict that the Zoom will make it difficult to return to the old days.
"People are not just another face on the grid, because we see the real-life environment in which people work—children run by, dogs bark, people make jokes to ease the tension that arises with these distractions," says Helm, who has three kids. "Home lives intersect with work lives for everyone, which means we are humanizing each other as we triage the responsibilities of coronavirus life."
After all our effort to promote gender equality—mentor and sponsorship programs, bias training, Lean-In seminars—have Zoom meetings during in the coronavirus era become the great leveler? No one in their wildest moment would have written that script.
But, hey, whatever works.
Contact Vivia Chen at [email protected]. On Twitter: @lawcareerist.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllStars and Gripes: Firms Need a 'Superstar Culture' to Crack the U.S. Market
6 minute readHSF's American Dream: What Will a U.S. Merger Mean For its Asia Practice?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Does My Company Really Need a Generative AI Policy?
- 2'This Is a Watershed Moment': Daniel's Law Overcomes Major Hurdle
- 3Navigating the Storm: Effective Crisis Management (Part 1)
- 4The Testamentary Exception Does Not Permit a Decedent to Impliedly Waive a Survivor’s Attorney-Client Privilege
- 5Trump 2.0 and Your Career
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250