Polsinelli, UnitedLex Deepen Alliance With New IP Joint Venture
In the latest targeted Big Law-New Law partnership, 200 technologists and engineers at UnitedLex will work with 130 Polsinelli IP attorneys and patent agents to help clients boost the value of their patent portfolios.
June 04, 2020 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
Am Law 100 firm Polsinelli is deepening its relationship with technology and legal services provider UnitedLex, launching a new venture to help clients manage and develop intellectual property assets.
While Polsinelli already turned to UnitedLex at the start of this year to build out a litigation support center focused on e-discovery, the IP teams for the two entities have been working together even longer.
Roughly a year ago, a mutual client set Joe Dearing, UnitedLex's executive vice president of global IP solutions, and Patrick Woolley, Polsinelli's IP department chairman, to collaborating on new ideas in patent drafting, prosecution and monetization. Dearing's 200-person team is heavy on technologists, engineers and doctorates, with just two attorneys. Woolley's department at Polsinelli is home to roughly 130 patent agents and attorneys.
"It became very obvious to the two of us that there was a big opportunity to combine our skill set from the two teams," Dearing said. "We're combining legal and technical expertise to solve problems that are difficult and expensive to solve for one company and one law firm."
Together, they are targeting clients in the tech sector, medical devices, and the auto industry, businesses that invest significant money in IP up front and have accumulated significant patent portfolios over the years.
"They often need help in rediscovering what they have in their patent portfolio," Dearing said. "When you have patents with a 20-year life, the patents that you filed 10 years ago are typically not front of mind if you're an in-house counsel."
Nonetheless, in an economic climate where many businesses are under severe pressure, there's great openness to new revenue streams, particularly rooted in existing assets.
But in addition to working together on identifying valuable legacy patents, the two organizations also aim to collaborate on patent development and prosecution.
"The clients we're trying to work most closely with are those that have developed or want to develop significant patent portfolios," said Woolley, who's based in Polsinelli's Kansas City, Missouri, office.
Unlike the litigation services agreement, under which Polsinelli has rebadged a "handful" of its own litigation support employees to UnitedLex, there's no transfer of personnel here.
"This is more about the organizations bringing together their respective strengths and working together in tandem," Woolley said.
And while the litigation agreement is set to last a minimum of five years, the IP tie-up does not have a fixed term.
"We're totally open-ended," Dearing said.
UnitedLex's latest deal with Polsinelli comes just a few months after the company announced another law firm venture: a partnership with Magic Circle firm Ashurst in Germany focused on investigations. Its most high-profile partnership with a traditional law firm unravelled last summer, when Am Law 200 firm LeClairRyan closed its doors in the wake of partner defections and declining revenues.
Read More
Why Polsinelli Bet on UnitedLex to Outpace In-House Litigation Support
Polsinelli Inks Deal With UnitedLex for Litigation Support Center
UnitedLex's Deal With LeClairRyan Was a Failure. Is It Also a Sign of Things to Come?
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Ridiculously Busy': Several Law Firms Position Themselves as Go-To Experts on Trump’s Executive Orders
5 minute readHolland & Knight Hires Former Davis Wright Tremaine Managing Partner in Seattle
3 minute readAm Law 200 Firms Announce Wave of D.C. Hires in White-Collar, Antitrust, Litigation Practices
3 minute readPaul Hastings Hires Music Industry Practice Chair From Willkie in Los Angeles
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250