Polsinelli, UnitedLex Deepen Alliance With New IP Joint Venture
In the latest targeted Big Law-New Law partnership, 200 technologists and engineers at UnitedLex will work with 130 Polsinelli IP attorneys and patent agents to help clients boost the value of their patent portfolios.
June 04, 2020 at 09:00 AM
3 minute read
Am Law 100 firm Polsinelli is deepening its relationship with technology and legal services provider UnitedLex, launching a new venture to help clients manage and develop intellectual property assets.
While Polsinelli already turned to UnitedLex at the start of this year to build out a litigation support center focused on e-discovery, the IP teams for the two entities have been working together even longer.
Roughly a year ago, a mutual client set Joe Dearing, UnitedLex's executive vice president of global IP solutions, and Patrick Woolley, Polsinelli's IP department chairman, to collaborating on new ideas in patent drafting, prosecution and monetization. Dearing's 200-person team is heavy on technologists, engineers and doctorates, with just two attorneys. Woolley's department at Polsinelli is home to roughly 130 patent agents and attorneys.
"It became very obvious to the two of us that there was a big opportunity to combine our skill set from the two teams," Dearing said. "We're combining legal and technical expertise to solve problems that are difficult and expensive to solve for one company and one law firm."
Together, they are targeting clients in the tech sector, medical devices, and the auto industry, businesses that invest significant money in IP up front and have accumulated significant patent portfolios over the years.
"They often need help in rediscovering what they have in their patent portfolio," Dearing said. "When you have patents with a 20-year life, the patents that you filed 10 years ago are typically not front of mind if you're an in-house counsel."
Nonetheless, in an economic climate where many businesses are under severe pressure, there's great openness to new revenue streams, particularly rooted in existing assets.
But in addition to working together on identifying valuable legacy patents, the two organizations also aim to collaborate on patent development and prosecution.
"The clients we're trying to work most closely with are those that have developed or want to develop significant patent portfolios," said Woolley, who's based in Polsinelli's Kansas City, Missouri, office.
Unlike the litigation services agreement, under which Polsinelli has rebadged a "handful" of its own litigation support employees to UnitedLex, there's no transfer of personnel here.
"This is more about the organizations bringing together their respective strengths and working together in tandem," Woolley said.
And while the litigation agreement is set to last a minimum of five years, the IP tie-up does not have a fixed term.
"We're totally open-ended," Dearing said.
UnitedLex's latest deal with Polsinelli comes just a few months after the company announced another law firm venture: a partnership with Magic Circle firm Ashurst in Germany focused on investigations. Its most high-profile partnership with a traditional law firm unravelled last summer, when Am Law 200 firm LeClairRyan closed its doors in the wake of partner defections and declining revenues.
|Read More
Why Polsinelli Bet on UnitedLex to Outpace In-House Litigation Support
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Recent Decisions Regarding the Telephone Consumer Protection Act
- 2The Tech Built by Law Firms in 2024
- 3Distressed M&A: Mass Torts, Bankruptcy and Furthering the Search for Consensus: Another Purdue Decision
- 4For Safer Traffic Stops, Replace Paper Documents With ‘Contactless’ Tech
- 5As Second Trump Administration Approaches, Businesses Brace for Sweeping Changes to Immigration Policy
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250