Judge Tosses Several of Recruiter's Claims Against Freshfields, Citing Lack of Written Contract
Only one claim survived, with the judge ruling it was "arguably distinguishable from its failure to exact a written agreement from Freshfields."
June 04, 2020 at 01:21 PM
3 minute read
A Massachusetts judge Wednesday dismissed much of a legal recruiting firm's suit against Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer that alleged the firm cut it out of a placement fee for partner Ethan Klingsberg's move.
In dismissing four of the five counts against Freshfields, U.S. District Judge Richard Stearns of the District of Massachusetts faulted the lack of a written agreement between Freshfields and the plaintiff, Boston Executive Search Associates, known as ESA. The surviving claim was distinguishable from the others, the judge said.
ESA, in its suit filed last year, claimed it was working with then-Freshfields' U.S. corporate leader, Mitchell Presser, to bulk up the Magic Circle firm's U.S.-based corporate team and helped bring Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton partner Klingsberg to the firm but was never paid for its efforts. ESA vice president Justin Morimoto connected Klingsberg and Presser in November 2018, the suit said, but Presser later told ESA to "hold off" on working toward the potential move, which ESA took to mean Freshfields was not interested in Klingsberg's candidacy.
Freshfields ultimately hired Klingsberg in October 2019, and Mark Rosen of Mark Bruce International has been credited with brokering the move. (Presser has since moved to Morrison & Foerster.)
In a moving to dismiss ESA's lawsuit, Freshfields said that it was already working with a different recruiter to bring Klingsberg to the firm.
In his decision Wednesday, Stearns cited Massachusetts law that provides that any agreement to pay a broker or finder for services is unenforceable unless the agreement is in writing and signed. Stearns dismissed ESA's claims alleging breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, quantum meruit and unjust enrichment.
The only claim Stearns maintained was an alleged violation of the Massachusetts Unfair Business Practices Act. While Freshfields claimed it was derivative of ESA's contract claims, the judge said it was "arguably distinguishable from its failure to exact a written agreement from Freshfields."
Whether the facts alleged by the recruiter are connected or simply coincidental "is impossible to say without a development of the record," said the judge, who set a schedule in which all fact discovery was to be completed by Jan. 25, 2021.
ESA previously sued Simpson Thacher & Bartlett over a partner placement fee, claiming the search firm was wrongfully denied a $900,000 payment. That matter settled in 2018.
ESA's counsel, Douglas Salvesen of Yurko, Salvesen & Remz, declined to comment. Freshfields did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
|Read More:
Recruiter Sues Freshfields, Claiming Credit for Cleary Rainmaker's Move
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllQuinn Emanuel Has Thrived in China. Will Trump Help Boost Its Fortunes?
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 2Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 3Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 4Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
- 5'It Refreshes Me': King & Spalding Privacy Leader Doubles as Equestrian Champ
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250