Most Law Firms Are Condensing Summer Programs, Cutting Their Time in Half
Nearly two-thirds of NALP survey respondents said that they've pivoted to five- or six-week programs this year.
June 11, 2020 at 07:12 PM
3 minute read
While most law firms are standing by their commitment to offer a summer associate program this year, the majority of firms have condensed their programs to a fraction of their original length, according to a National Association of Law Placement study released Thursday.
In the study, based on the responses of 391 law offices and 155 law schools, NALP found that 86% of law offices that responded are still planning to hold a summer program—and more than half of these will be all virtual, amid the coronavirus pandemic.
About 10 weeks has long been the standard length of a summer program, but nearly two-thirds of firm respondents said that they've pivoted to 5- or 6-week programs this year. Some large firms are going further, with Kirkland & Ellis whittling down its summer program to two weeks and Sidley Austin and Baker & Hostetler down to at least four weeks.
Many in the industry say a pared-down program is still better than nothing. "It makes sense to condense it. It's very much about the substance over the length," Nathan Peart, the managing director of Major, Lindsey & Africa's associate practice group, told The American Lawyer last month.
Overall, of those firms that were still planning to hold a summer program, 55% said they would hold all-virtual programs, according to NALP, whose surveys were conducted in May. Meanwhile, 40% said they would use a hybrid model if possible, starting virtual and hopefully transitioning to in-person later in the summer.
Only 5% of law offices that were planning to hold a summer program said their program would be entirely in-person. These were largely offices in the South and Midwest. In contrast, firms in the Mid-Atlantic (66%) and the Northeast (65%) were more inclined to move their summer associate programs entirely online.
Among the firms that canceled their summer associate programs, the vast majority (86%) said they extended job offers to at least some of the 2L students who were set to spend the summer with them. But as many 2020 law school graduates have had their full-time associate start date pushed back until at least January 2021, it remains to be seen when the majority of the graduates in 2021 will start full-time work.
News of adjusted summer associate programs has been circulating for months as many law firms shifted to indefinite remote work starting in mid-March. Even as states begin to reopen, many law firm attorneys and staff—as well as their summer associates—remain home for the foreseeable future.
NALP also surveyed 155 law schools for the study and found that over half of schools (51%) have established 2L on-campus interview dates for recruiting the class of 2022 for summer 2021 programs, but many of them have pushed back the dates, largely from July and August of 2020 to at least January 2021. The push comes as many law schools shifted to a pass/fail grading system this spring.
|Read More:
Summer Associate Programs and COVID-19: How Law Firms Are Responding
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBig Law Practice Leaders 'Bullish' That Second Trump Presidency Will Be Good for Business
3 minute readLatham's New Partner Class Leans Toward Corporate Practices
Law Firm Diversity Pros Fear for Future of DEI Efforts Under Trump Presidency
Big Law Leaders, Dealmakers Optimistic About M&A Deal Flow Under Trump, With Caveats
5 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4How I Made Practice Group Chair: 'If You Love What You Do and Put the Time and Effort Into It, You Will Excel,' Says Lisa Saul of Forde & O'Meara
- 5Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250