Most Law Firms Are Condensing Summer Programs, Cutting Their Time in Half
Nearly two-thirds of NALP survey respondents said that they've pivoted to five- or six-week programs this year.
June 11, 2020 at 07:12 PM
3 minute read
While most law firms are standing by their commitment to offer a summer associate program this year, the majority of firms have condensed their programs to a fraction of their original length, according to a National Association of Law Placement study released Thursday.
In the study, based on the responses of 391 law offices and 155 law schools, NALP found that 86% of law offices that responded are still planning to hold a summer program—and more than half of these will be all virtual, amid the coronavirus pandemic.
About 10 weeks has long been the standard length of a summer program, but nearly two-thirds of firm respondents said that they've pivoted to 5- or 6-week programs this year. Some large firms are going further, with Kirkland & Ellis whittling down its summer program to two weeks and Sidley Austin and Baker & Hostetler down to at least four weeks.
Many in the industry say a pared-down program is still better than nothing. "It makes sense to condense it. It's very much about the substance over the length," Nathan Peart, the managing director of Major, Lindsey & Africa's associate practice group, told The American Lawyer last month.
Overall, of those firms that were still planning to hold a summer program, 55% said they would hold all-virtual programs, according to NALP, whose surveys were conducted in May. Meanwhile, 40% said they would use a hybrid model if possible, starting virtual and hopefully transitioning to in-person later in the summer.
Only 5% of law offices that were planning to hold a summer program said their program would be entirely in-person. These were largely offices in the South and Midwest. In contrast, firms in the Mid-Atlantic (66%) and the Northeast (65%) were more inclined to move their summer associate programs entirely online.
Among the firms that canceled their summer associate programs, the vast majority (86%) said they extended job offers to at least some of the 2L students who were set to spend the summer with them. But as many 2020 law school graduates have had their full-time associate start date pushed back until at least January 2021, it remains to be seen when the majority of the graduates in 2021 will start full-time work.
News of adjusted summer associate programs has been circulating for months as many law firms shifted to indefinite remote work starting in mid-March. Even as states begin to reopen, many law firm attorneys and staff—as well as their summer associates—remain home for the foreseeable future.
NALP also surveyed 155 law schools for the study and found that over half of schools (51%) have established 2L on-campus interview dates for recruiting the class of 2022 for summer 2021 programs, but many of them have pushed back the dates, largely from July and August of 2020 to at least January 2021. The push comes as many law schools shifted to a pass/fail grading system this spring.
Read More:
Summer Associate Programs and COVID-19: How Law Firms Are Responding
Is a 2-Week Summer Associate Program Even Worth It? Kirkland Isn't the Only Firm That Thinks So
Top Law Schools Say Firms Are Pushing to Delay Summer Associate Hiring
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllKPMG's Bid to Practice Law in U.S. on Indefinite Hold, as Arizona Justices Exercise Caution
Orrick Hires Longtime Weil Partner as New Head of Antitrust Litigation
Sidley Adds Ex-DOJ Criminal Division Deputy Leader, Paul Hastings Adds REIT Partner, in Latest DC Hiring
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 2Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 3Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firm's Innovation Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
- 4Trump's DOJ Files Lawsuit Seeking to Block $14B Tech Merger
- 5'No Retributive Actions,' Kash Patel Pledges if Confirmed to FBI
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250