Pillsbury Commits $11M Over 3 Years in Cash, Pro Bono Work to Equal Justice Causes
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman's commitment, taken together, is the largest by far from Big Law in the recent efforts to promote racial justice and equity in America.
June 15, 2020 at 01:57 PM
5 minute read
Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman has pledged to donate $1 million in cash and $10 million over three years in pro bono and volunteer work to social and racial justice causes, the firm announced Monday.
Many firms have made similar pledges, offering donations from firm foundations and employees as well as offering to step up pro bono efforts. Kirkland & Ellis, notably, promised a $5 million contribution over five years to social justice causes.
But, if taken as a full figure incorporating the assumed $10 million in pro bono work, Pillsbury's commitment is the largest to date by a major law firm.
"Over these past few weeks, the Pillsbury community has come together to listen to and support one another, and commit to doing better," firm chair David Dekker said in a statement. "After gathering input from a diverse cross-section of our firm, it is clear that only a sustained commitment of this magnitude will enable us to have the desired impact."
The initial cash infusion will be provided via the firm's Pillsbury Foundation, while the estimated pro bono and volunteer work will be done by the firm's attorneys and employees.
"Essentially, we as a firm decided to create a response to what is going on," Stacie Yee, a partner in the firm's Los Angeles office and executive chair of the firm's diversity and inclusion committee, said in an interview. "There was overwhelming outpouring by attorneys and staff, and they wanted to focus on these issues of race, equality and criminal justice. When we were brainstorming how to address this, we decided to put numbers to our commitment. It is about accountability. Specifically with the amount of the pro bono. That is over and above what we have done previously. About 10% higher and in addition to what we have normally done."
Yee said the firm routinely does about $25 million annually in pro bono work, and the additional $3.3 million in hours per year over three years will supplement that work.
Yee also said the volunteering aspect of the commitment was important in order to give the firm's staff, most of whom do not have legal degrees, an opportunity to contribute as well.
The firm said its focus over the first iterations of the donations will focus on improving and reforming criminal justice, building societal equity through mentorship programs, increasing access and opportunity for black-owned businesses and "ensuring full representation for Black Americans in Washington."
The firm said these latest commitments will be in addition to its ongoing efforts such as its partnership with the Equal Justice Works Fellowship Program, which the firm says it has funded for 20 years.
Yee acknowledged that the accounting of these efforts will be a work in progress, but that they plan on having frequent check ins to track progress and make sure they are on the right path to meeting their goals.
Yee said that the target will be met by a mix of increased participation from attorneys who already do a good amount of pro bono work as well as contributions form those lawyers and staff that previously had not made volunteering and pro bono work a significant part of their workload.
"It was readily apparent to me and all of our firm leaders that we could do something really impactful and sustainable, and that our people were passionate about our doing so," Yee said in a statement. "It's no secret that law firms have work to do when it comes to parity and inclusion. This commitment to our communities is in addition to our commitment to improving the recruiting, mentoring, advancement and retention of our diverse attorneys and staff across our platform."
Many other firms have committed to at least six-figure donations over the past several weeks, including Latham & Watkins ($500,000) and Cooley ($450,000).
While no doubt a welcome problem to have, many social and racial justice organizations are receiving so many donations from corporate and legal players that they are actually pushing donations elsewhere, The New York Times reports.
Much of that has been fueled by massive donations from the corporate sector, such as Amazon's $10 million donation to various civil rights organizations.
While corporate giants may have some impressive numbers attached to their respective giving, as a percentage of annual revenue things look a bit different.
Pillsbury, for example, had $667 million in revenue in 2019. It's $11 million commitment is roughly 1.6% of that number. Amazon's $10 million donation, against revenues of $87.4 billion in 2019, constitutes about .001% of its annual sales.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250