Are Bank Practices Finally Seeing a Rebound Amid the Pandemic Response?
"We're at a critical, unique juncture for the financial services industry itself," said Mark Chorazak, a Shearman partner.
June 16, 2020 at 05:58 PM
5 minute read
Financial regulatory work in the U.S. has been slower the last few years, in part due to the Trump administration rolling back rules and enforcement for banks enacted after the last financial crisis.
But partners representing banks say they're now anticipating an uptick in work due to the economic turmoil and various credit and loan programs created during the pandemic. Meanwhile, the outcome of the next presidential election has the potential to create another practice swing.
"We're at a critical, unique juncture for the financial services industry itself," said Mark Chorazak, who joined Shearman & Sterling earlier this month as a partner in its financial institutions advisory and financial regulatory practice in New York.
Chorazak, most recently at Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft, advises financial clients on such matters as the Bank Holding Company Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and other U.S. banking laws. Although work in his practice area has been a bit slower in the last few years, he said he expects work to pick up as financial institutions prepare for post-pandemic realities.
"Once the pandemic ends, we will likely see new and increased supervisory scrutiny and regulatory requirements," he said, adding clients are "anticipating a different reality after this pandemic we're living in. Everything flowing from it will create new demands for regulatory counsel."
Specifically, Chorazak said he expects there to be increased supervisory scrutiny placed on financial institutions in the coming months, including more congressional oversight on banks due to the pandemic, and work stemming from federal government loan programs.
Barney Reynolds, head of Shearman's financial services industry group, said his firm is already seeing heightened demand for financial regulatory advice from existing clients navigating the coronavirus economy. "There are an awful lot of deals, restructurings and bankruptcies, and financial institutions are at the heart of it all," he added.
Other firms are also reporting upticks in banking practice activity. Witold Balaban, global co-chairman of Latham & Watkins' financial institutions industry group, said his team has been navigating clients through business disruptions, regulatory matters and product structuring challenges as a result of the pandemic.
"In the wake of COVID-19, we've been advising clients on critical areas such as accessing the Federal Reserve's various emergency funding facilities, as well as issues related to operational resilience, restructuring, conduct and culture, litigation and more," he said in an email.
He said "a major area of focus" is safely guiding clients through LIBOR transition issues and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation Best Interest requirements, a standard of conduct requiring broker-dealers' recommendations to be in the best interest of retail customers.
In addition to working on pandemic-related matters, Balaban said the Latham team was already advising clients on various technological advances that are changing the financial regulatory sector.
"Demand for savvy counsel who can advise on the evolving regulatory landscape regarding digitization of financial services and digital assets, including crypto assets, continues to grow," he said.
|A 'seasonal' practice
At Simpson Thacher & Bartlett, bank regulatory partner Keith Noreika said this area of the law was "seasonal," and while the demand for financial regulatory counsel is always there to some extent, the current financial crisis highlights that need.
"Policymakers have done incredible work to put in place security programs to turn on the emergency liquidity authority of the Federal Reserve and Congress, which has resulted in a lot of work for those who do what I do," said Noreika, a former acting comptroller of the currency.
In April, his work was focused on navigating the government's immediate economic response to the pandemic, as issuers needed help accessing capital markets, small businesses needed help applying for Paycheck Protection Program loans, and midmarket companies needed help with the Main Street Lending Program.
"However, this won't be a continuing practice," he said, adding that as the country slowly begins to reopen, the strength of the financial sector may promote a return to more market activity and typical M&A transactions.
"I get a sense that we're not far away from going back to more normal, and the inertia will come back, coupled with an added regulatory angle—loan forgiveness, forbearance, and congressional and attorney general investigations that will come given the amount of money the government has put into the marketplace," he said.
But even as firms report seeing more financial regulatory work, or at least expect to, the activity isn't yet creating soaring demand for lateral hires. Ross Weil of Walker Search said he hasn't yet seen an increased appetite for financial regulatory lawyers, but he pointed out that the pandemic's disruption of the hiring market may present an opportunity for some lawyers looking to make a move.
Shearman's recent partner hiring of Chorazak, he said, "demonstrates the reality" among so much uncertainty: "You still need to have a strong bench in that practice area, both now as well as in the new normal."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Further Investment in Power' Will Drive Big Law Business—But What About Clean Energy Projects?
6 minute readLegal Departments Gripe About Outside Counsel but Rarely Talk to Them
4 minute readAs Profits Rise, Law Firms Likely to Make More AI Investments in 2025
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250